Search

Aims: Guidelines recommend the use of fractional flow reserve (FFR) to guide percutaneous coronary intervention. For this purpose, physiological lesion assessment without adenosine may have a similar diagnostic accuracy as FFR. We aimed to investigate the performances of FFR, resting instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR), and resting Pd/Pa compared with [15O]H2O positron emission tomography (PET) perfusion imaging., Methods and Results: [15O]H2O PET and intracoronary pressure measurements were evaluated in 320 coronary arteries (of which 136 coronary stenoses) in 129 stable patients. The primary analysis consisting of the area-under-the-receiver-operating-characteristic curve for impaired PET hyperaemic myocardial blood flow (MBF) <2.3 mL⋅min-1⋅g-1 in coronary stenoses was 0.78 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.70-0.85] for FFR, 0.74 (95% CI: 0.66-0.81) for iFR, and 0.75 (95% CI: 0.67-0.82) for Pd/Pa. No significant differences between area-under-the-receiver-operating-characteristic curve were observed for any two indices compared. In a secondary analysis, the diagnostic accuracy compared with impaired PET hyperaemic MBF in coronary stenoses was 72% (95% CI: 64-79%, κ: 0.44) for FFR ≤0.80, 72% (95% CI: 64-80%, κ: 0.44) for iFR ≤0.89, and 70% (95% CI: 62-78%, κ: 0.40) for Pd/Pa ≤0.92. Other secondary analyses included a comparison of physiological indices with PET hyperaemic MBF in all vessels and all of the aforementioned analyses using PET myocardial perfusion reserve as comparator. Statistical testing for the secondary analyses showed results that were consistent with the results of the primary analysis., Conclusion: Fractional flow reserve, iFR, and Pd/Pa showed a similar performance when compared with PET imaging. Our results support the validity of invasive physiological lesion assessment under resting conditions by iFR or Pd/Pa., Trial Registration: Sub-study of the PACIFIC trial with clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT01521468.

Aims: The pathophysiology underlying aortic valve stenosis (AVS)-induced cardiac dysfunction and reduced exercise capacity is unclear. We hypothesize that improvement of myocardial external efficiency (MEE)--the ratio between external work and myocardial oxygen consumption (MVO2)--underlies functional improvement of AVS patients after aortic valve replacement (AVR). Therefore, the aim of this proof-of-concept study was to investigate whether myocardial efficiency is reduced in patients with cardiac hypertrophy caused by AVS and to assess the effect of AVR on myocardial efficiency in relation to exercise capacity., Methods and Results: Echocardiography, cardiopulmonary exercise test, [(11)C]-acetate positron emission tomography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging were performed in 10 AVS patients prior to (pre-AVR) and 4 months after AVR (post-AVR). Fourteen healthy individuals served as control group. MEE was significantly lower in pre-AVR patients (32 ± 7%) than in controls (49 ± 6%). AVR significantly decreased left ventricle mass and MVO2. Also, external work significantly decreased post-AVR reaching similar values as in controls. AVR significantly improved MEE from 32 ± 7 to 37 ± 5% (P = 0.02). Moreover, significant correlations were present between the AVR-induced increase in MEE and changes in both exercise work (r = 0.74, P = 0.01) and peak VO2 (r = 0.67, P = 0.03). However, four AVS patients did not show improved MEE, which was associated with no or minimal improvement in exercise parameters., Conclusion: MEE is significantly reduced in patients with AVS-induced hypertrophy. Improved MEE is an important predictor of AVR-induced improvement of exercise capacity in AVS patients. Future investigation is needed to confirm our observations in a large prospective, multicenter clinical trial., (Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author 2015. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Aims: Sympathetic denervation typically occurs in the infarcted myocardium and is associated with sudden cardiac death. Impaired innervation was also demonstrated in non-infarcted myocardium in ischaemic and dilated cardiomyopathy (ICMP and DCMP). Factors affecting sympathetic nerve integrity in remote myocardium are unknown. Perfusion abnormalities, even in the absence of epicardial coronary artery disease, may relate to sympathetic dysfunction. This study was aimed to assess the interrelations of myocardial blood flow (MBF), contractile function, and sympathetic innervation in non-infarcted remote myocardium., Methods and Results: Seventy patients with ICMP or DCMP and LVEF ≤35% were included. [(15)O]H2O- and [(11)C]hydroxyephedrine (HED) PET was performed to quantify resting MBF, hyperaemic MBF, and sympathetic innervation. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging was performed to assess left ventricular function, mass, wall thickening, and scar size. Wall thickening, [(11)C]HED retention index (RI), and MBF were assessed in remote segments without scar, selected on CMR. [(11)C]HED RI was correlated with resting MBF (r = 0.41, P < 0.001) and hyperaemic MBF (r = 0.55, P < 0.001) in remote myocardium in both ICMP and DCMP. In addition, LV volumes (r = -0.40, P = 0.001), LV mass (r = -0.31, P = 0.008), and wall thickening (r = 0.45, P < 0.001) correlated with remote [(11)C]HED RI. Multivariable analysis revealed that hyperaemic MBF (B = 0.79, P < 0.001), wall thickening (B = 0.01, P = 0.03), and LVEDV (B = -0.03, P = 0.02) were independent predictors for remote [(11)C]HED RI., Conclusion: Hyperaemic MBF is independently associated with sympathetic innervation in non-infarcted remote myocardium in patients with ICMP and DCMP. This suggests that microvascular dysfunction might be an important factor related to sympathetic nerve integrity. Whether impaired hyperaemic MBF is the primary cause of this relation remains unclear., (Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author 2015. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Myocardial ischaemia occurs principally in the subendocardial layer, whereas conventional myocardial perfusion imaging provides no information on the transmural myocardial blood flow (MBF) distribution. Subendocardial perfusion measurements and quantification of the transmural perfusion gradient (TPG) could be more sensitive and specific for the detection of coronary artery disease (CAD). The current study aimed to determine the impact of lesion severity as assessed by the fractional flow reserve (FFR) on subendocardial perfusion and the TPG using [(15)O]H2O positron emission tomography (PET) imaging in patients evaluated for CAD., Methods and Results: Sixty-six patients with anginal chest pain were prospectively enrolled and underwent [(15)O]H2O myocardial perfusion PET imaging. Subsequently, invasive coronary angiography was performed and FFR obtained in all coronary arteries irrespective of the PET imaging results. Thirty (45%) patients were diagnosed with significant CAD (i.e. FFR ≤0.80), whereas on a per vessel analysis (n = 198), 53 (27%) displayed a positive FFR. Transmural hyperaemic MBF decreased significantly from 3.09 ± 1.16 to 1.67 ± 0.57 mL min(-1) g(-1) (P < 0.001) in non-ischaemic and ischaemic myocardium, respectively. The TPG decreased during hyperaemia when compared with baseline (1.20 ± 0.14 vs. 0.94 ± 0.17, P < 0.001), and was lower in arteries with a positive FFR (0.97 ± 0.16 vs. 0.88 ± 0.18, P < 0.01). A TPG threshold of 0.94 yielded an accuracy to detect CAD of 59%, which was inferior to transmural MBF with an optimal cutoff of 2.20 mL min(-1) g(-1) and an accuracy of 85% (P < 0.001). Diagnostic accuracy of subendocardial perfusion measurements was comparable with transmural MBF (83 vs. 85%, respectively, P = NS)., Conclusion: Cardiac [(15)O]H2O PET imaging is able to distinguish subendocardial from subepicardial perfusion in the myocardium of normal dimensions. Hyperaemic TPG is significantly lower in ischaemic myocardium. This technique can potentially be employed to study subendocardial perfusion impairment in more detail. However, the diagnostic accuracy of subendocardial hyperaemic perfusion and TPG appears to be limited compared with quantitative transmural MBF, warranting further study., (Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author 2014. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Aims: Absolute quantification of myocardial blood flow (MBF) with (15)O-water cardiac positron emission tomography (PET)/CT has recently demonstrated to hold promising diagnostic value for the detection of coronary artery disease (CAD). However, methodological differences in utilized analysis software packages (SP) could affect generated MBF values, potentially prohibiting widespread clinical applicability of obtained normal thresholds. The aim of this study was to compare two validated non-commercial SP, Carimas and Cardiac VUer, for the quantification of MBF using (15)O-water PET., Methods and Results: One hundred patients with intermediate likelihood of CAD and scanned in academic centres in Amsterdam (n = 50) and Turku (n = 50) were included in the study. Patients underwent a (15)O-water PET/CT scan during rest and vasodilator stress based on clinical indications. A single observer, blinded from clinical results and with no prior experience in either SP, analysed all patients twice with both SP. Reproducibility of each SP was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Intersoftware agreement was assessed using paired t-tests and linear regression. ICC was excellent for each SP for both global and regional MBF (ICC >0.90). Global MBF was comparable between Carimas and Cardiac VUer during rest (1.02 ± 0.28 vs. 0.99 ± 0.23 mL min(-1)g(-1), respectively, P = 0.07), and slightly higher for Carimas during stress (2.73 ± 0.82 vs. 2.63 ± 0.84 mL min(-1)g(-1), respectively, P = 0.01). At a regional level, for resting conditions small (<10%) but significant discrepancies were noted in each vascular territory while for stress MBF, a significant difference was only observed for the LAD region. Differences between SP for the LAD territory were abolished after exclusion of the distal apical segment, which is susceptible to spillover artefacts. An excellent correlation between MBF values was found for global (r = 0.96) and regional MBF (r > 0.94 for all)., Conclusion: For global and regional MBF, Carimas and Cardiac VUer showed excellent agreement and intra-observer reproducibility. These results confirm that, for patients with intermediate likelihood of CAD, these validated SP are interchangeable and can be utilized for routine clinical practice of (15)O-water cardiac PET.

Aims: This study evaluates the impact of hybrid imaging on referral for invasive coronary angiography (ICA) and revascularization rates., Methods and Results: A total of 375 patients underwent hybrid (15)O-water positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT)-based coronary angiography (CTCA) imaging for the evaluation of coronary artery disease (CAD). Downstream treatment strategy within a 60-day period after hybrid PET/CTCA imaging for ICA referral and revascularization was assessed. CTCA examinations were classified as showing no (obstructive) CAD, equivocal (borderline test result), or obstructive CAD, while the PET perfusion images were classified into normal or abnormal. On the basis of CTCA imaging, 182 (49%) patients displayed no (obstructive) CAD. Only 10 (5%) patients who showed no (obstructive) CAD on CTCA were referred for ICA, which were all negative. An equivocal CT study was observed in 80 (21%) patients, among whom 56 (70%) showed normal myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI), resulting in referral rates for ICA of 18% for normal MPI and 71% for abnormal MPI, respectively. No revascularizations were performed in the presence of normal MPI, while 59% of those with abnormal MPI were revascularized. CTCA indentified obstructive CAD in 113 (30%) patients accompanied in 59 (52%) patients with abnormal MPI. Referral rate for ICA was 57% for normal MPI and 88% for those with abnormal MPI, resulting in revascularization rates of 26% and 72%, respectively., Conclusion: Hybrid (15)O-water PET/CTCA imaging impacts clinical decision-making with regard to referral for ICA and revascularization procedures. Particularly, in the presence of an equivocal or abnormal CTCA, MPI could guide in the decision to refer for ICA and revascularization.

Aims: There is growing evidence that coronary artery disease (CAD) affects not only the conduit epicardial coronary arteries, but also the microvascular coronary bed. Moreover, coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMVD) often precedes the stage of clinically overt epicardial CAD. Coronary artery calcium (CAC) and carotid intima-media thickness (C-IMT) measured with computed tomography (CT) and ultrasound, respectively, are among the available techniques to non-invasively assess atherosclerotic burden. An increased CAC score and C-IMT have also been associated with CMVD. It is therefore of interest to explore and compare the potential of CAC against C-IMT to predict minimal coronary vascular resistance (CVR)., Methods and Results: We evaluated 120 patients (mean age 56 ± 9 years, 58 men) without a documented history of CAD in whom obstructive CAD was excluded. All patients underwent C-IMT measurements, CAC scoring, and vasodilator stress (15)O-water positron emission tomography (PET)/CT, during which the coronary flow reserve (CFR) and minimal CVR were analysed. Minimal CVR increased significantly with increasing tertiles of C-IMT (22 ± 6, 27 ± 11, and 28 ± 9 mmHg mL(-1)min(-1) g(-1), P < 0.01), whereas the CFR was comparable across all C-IMT groups (P = 0.50). Minimal CVR increased significantly with an increase in CAC score (23 ± 9, 27 ± 8, 32 ± 10, and 32 ± 7 mmHg mL(-1) min(-1) g(-1), P < 0.01), whereas the CFR did not show a significant decrease with higher CAC scores (P = 0.18). Multivariable regression analysis revealed that C-IMT (P = 0.03), but not CAC, was independently associated with minimal CVR., Conclusion: C-IMT, but not CAC score, independently predicts minimal CVR in patients with multiple cardiovascular risk factors and suspected of CAD.