Search

In addition to its role in calcium homeostasis and bone health, vitamin D has also been reported to have anticancer activities against many cancer types, including breast cancer. The discovery that breast epithelial cells possess the same enzymatic system as the kidney, allowing local manufacture of active vitamin D from circulating precursors, makes the effect of vitamin D in breast cancer biologically plausible. Preclinical and ecologic studies have suggested a role for vitamin D in breast cancer prevention. Inverse associations have also been shown between serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D level (25(OH)D) and breast cancer development, risk for breast cancer recurrence, and mortality in women with early-stage breast cancer. Clinical trials of vitamin D supplementation, however, have yielded inconsistent results. Regardless of whether or not vitamin D helps prevent breast cancer or its recurrence, vitamin D deficiency in the U.S. population is very common, and the adverse impact on bone health, a particular concern for breast cancer survivors, makes it important to understand vitamin D physiology and to recognize and treat vitamin D deficiency. In this review, we discuss vitamin D metabolism and its mechanism of action. We summarize the current evidence of the relationship between vitamin D and breast cancer, highlight ongoing research in this area, and discuss optimal dosing of vitamin D for breast cancer prevention.

Pancreatic cancer is the fourth most common cause of adult cancer death in the U.S. The high mortality rate from pancreatic cancer is a result of the high incidence of metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis, an often fulminant clinical course, and the lack of adequate systemic therapies. Unfortunately, only 5%-25% of patients present with tumors amenable to resection. The median disease-free survival interval following resection for operable pancreatic cancer is 13.4 months for patients treated with adjuvant gemcitabine and 6.9 months for untreated patients. A much higher percentage of patients present with metastatic disease (40%-45%) or locally advanced disease (40%), and have median survival times of 3-6 months or 8-12 months, respectively. The frustrating lack of significant clinical advancements in the treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer remains one of medical oncology's biggest disappointments. The past decade-long frustration has resulted in regulators, investigators, and practicing oncologists gradually lowering their standards/expectations with regard to interpreting clinical trials. Two of the more important examples of this include the approval of gemcitabine plus erlotinib and the use of a progression-free survival advantage to defend the use of gemcitabine plus oxaliplatin. Given the marginal benefit of systemic antineoplastics, a scholarly review inclusive of other palliative strategies will help oncologists optimize the care of pancreatic cancer patients. This article examines the existing evidence in support of a role for palliative therapy in metastatic pancreatic cancer, describes recent developments with newer chemotherapeutic and molecular-targeted agents, and explores future study designs.

The concept of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphomas was introduced by Isaacson and Wright [Cancer 1983; 52:1410-1416] in 1983. After more than 20 years of clinical research MALT lymphomas are now recognized as a distinct subtype of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) with unique pathogenic, histological, and clinical features. Although this subtype of NHL occurs frequently, optimal management remains elusive. This manuscript reviews features of the clinical presentation, diagnosis, pathology, molecular characteristics, and management of both gastric and non-gastric MALT lymphoma.

Cancer of the urothelium is the fourth most common malignancy in men in the U.S. and the ninth most common in women. More than 63,000 Americans will be diagnosed with bladder cancer this year (47,010 men and 16,200 women), and more than 13,000 (8,970 men and 4,210 women) can expect to die of their disease. The approximate 5:1 ratio of incidence to mortality roughly parallels the frequency of superficial to invasive disease. Efforts to improve this ratio have generated a potential paradigm shift in the treatment of urothelial cancer, incorporating increasingly active chemotherapy into treatment regimens for high-risk tumors in both the pre-and postoperative settings. This review summarizes the evolution of chemotherapeutic treatment of urothelial cancer and the rationale for its perioperative administration and addresses the future directions of clinical research in this field.

Primary systemic therapy (PST) or neoadjuvant therapy is used in nonmetastatic breast cancer to treat systemic disease earlier, decrease tumor bulk ideally to a complete pathological response (pCR), and reduce the extent of surgery. The multitude of clinical trials using PST in breast cancer patients has not proven the fundamental hypotheses of improved overall survival and disease-free survival that drove the investigation of PST. The other potential advantages of PST, which include increasing the rate of breast-conserving surgery and predicting outcome to a particular chemotherapy regimen, are also not conclusively established. We examined the published literature on PST for breast cancer and predominantly focused our review on data from large, randomized clinical trials comparing primary systemic chemotherapy with adjuvant chemotherapy, different primary systemic chemotherapy regimens, primary systemic chemotherapy with hormonal therapy, and different preoperative hormonal therapies. Although the optimal neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen has not been established, a combination of four cycles of an anthracycline followed by four cycles of a taxane appears to produce the highest pCR rate (22%-31%). In patients with HER-2-positive breast cancer, concurrent use of neoadjuvant trastuzumab with an anthracycline-taxane combination has produced provocative results that require further confirmatory studies. Preoperative hormonal therapy is associated with low pCR rates and should be reserved for patients who are poor candidates for systemic chemotherapy. The optimal management of patients with residual disease after the administration of maximum neoadjuvant therapy remains to be defined. The surgical approach, including the role of sentinel node biopsy and delivery of radiation therapy after PST in breast cancer patients, is evolving. Ongoing clinical trials will help identify the subset of patients who would most benefit from the use of PST, establish the most effective PST regimen, and determine the optimal multidisciplinary approach in the management of breast cancer.

This update is devoted to discussion of optimal supportive and palliative care of patients with pancreatic cancer. Approximately 33,000 new cases of pancreatic cancer are predicted for the U.S. in 2002. Because diagnosis and intervention occur late in the course of this disease, the vast majority of patients already have metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis. These tumors are relatively resistant to systemic chemotherapy, making pancreatic cancer the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death in the U.S. and the Western world. For these reasons, efforts at identifying and treating disease-related symptomatology are priorities. This update overviews symptom management, supportive care strategies, and both standard and emerging palliative chemotherapy options. The incorporation of molecularly targeted therapies into treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer is reviewed as well. These strategies are of relevance to internists, gastroenterologists, oncologists, and other specialists who care for patients with pancreatic cancer.

Background: Single agents have only modest activity as treatment for metastatic pancreatic cancer with response rates of less than 10% and median survivals of less than 6 months. Evaluations of single-agent gemcitabine and rubitecan as second-line treatment for relapsed pancreatic cancer have reported good patient tolerability and median survivals of 3.85 months and 4.7 months, respectively. Regimens incorporating two drugs have demonstrated encouraging activity and clinical impact compared with single-agent therapy. G-FLIP is a regimen designed to incorporate four active single agents into a tolerable and active combination. This analysis is a retrospective evaluation of the efficacy and safety of the G-FLIP regimen as second-line chemotherapy in a series of consecutively treated patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer., Methods: G-FLIP was administered over 48 hours and repeated every 2 weeks. Day 1 treatment consisted of sequentially administered gemcitabine 500 mg/m(2), irinotecan 80 mg/m(2), leucovorin 300 mg, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) 400 mg/m(2) bolus followed by infusional 5-FU 600 mg/m(2) over 8 hours. Day 2 treatment consisted of leucovorin 300 mg and 5-FU 400 mg/m(2) bolus, followed by cisplatin 50 to 75 mg/m(2), and then infusional 5-FU 600 mg/m(2) over 8 hours., Results: Thirty-four patients with histologically confirmed metastatic pancreatic cancer were consecutively treated. The median patient age was 64.5 years (range 41-82 years) and all patients had objective disease progression on prior therapy: 32 patients had disease progression with gemcitabine and 31 had disease progression with a gemcitabine/5-fluorouracil/cisplatin combination. Grade 3-4 hematological toxicities included anemia (23%), thrombocytopenia (53%), and neutropenia (38%). There were no grade 3-4 neutropenic fevers, treatment-related mortalities, or withdrawals. Nonhematological grade 3-4 toxicities were rare: nausea/vomiting (3%), neurotoxicity (3%), nephrotoxicity (6%), and diarrhea (3%). Based on RECIST criteria a partial response (PR) was attained in eight patients (24%) and seven patients had stable disease (SD). Seven and six patients who attained a PR or SD, respectively, had disease progression with prior gemcitabine-based therapy. The median time to disease progression for all 34 patients was 3.9 months and 5.9 months for the eight patients who attained a PR. Median overall survival for all 34 patients was 10.3 months., Conclusion: Adding a single new drug such as irinotecan to the same first-line chemotherapy combination upon disease progression may be an important alternative to switching to different drug classes for treatment of relapsed/resistant cancer. The promising clinical outcomes and moderate toxicity associated with G-FLIP in this heavily pretreated group warrant development of this novel regimen including tests as first-line therapy in patients with diseases likely to be responsive to the drugs contained in this combination.

This article reviews highlights in the field of hematologic malignancies presented at the 2001 annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. Targeted therapies continue to proceed from the laboratory to the clinic. Monoclonal antibody-based therapies predominate, and further data on radioimmunoconjugates (RICs) (tositumomab and Iodine 131 tositumomab [Bexxar] and ibritumomab tiuxetan [Zevalin]) are presented. Both agents have high response rates in relapsed B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). Results from the first trial directly comparing an RIC (Zevalin) to an unconjugated antibody (rituximab) are presented. A novel application of RIC therapy as part of high-dose therapy for mantle cell NHL is described. A new fusion toxin, BL22, targets the CD22 antigen and shows marked activity in the treatment of hairy cell leukemia. Similarly, the Hu1D10 monoclonal antibody has activity in B-cell NHL and might have a relatively unique mechanism of action. Finally, advances in the treatment of mucositis are described. These abstracts all describe therapies derived from our enhanced understanding of tumor immunology and molecular biology.

The cure rate for pancreatic cancer remains less than 5% despite more than 20 years of clinical trials. Nevertheless, a select group of patients benefit from therapy at all stages of disease and important concepts regarding patient care have emerged. The development of agents such as gemcitabine and docetaxel have spurred a new generation of clinical trials in pancreatic cancer. An appreciation for the results of the many adjuvant and neoadjuvant trials and the application of lessons learned in the care of these patients is necessary to design the new trials.

Approximately 3,500 cases of stage I and II Hodgkin's disease are diagnosed each year in the United States. Traditionally, those patients who are considered candidates for primary radiation therapy undergo staging laparotomy (pathologic staging) to rule out definitively the presence of occult subdiaphragmatic disease. An appreciation of the risks of laparotomy and a recognition of the effectiveness of salvage chemotherapy in patients who fail primary radiation therapy have permitted the increased use of clinical staging as the basis for treatment of these patients. This article summarizes the literature regarding the need for staging laparotomy in early stage Hodgkin's disease and suggests alternative approaches to the management of these patients based on clinical criteria and prognostic factors.

PRIMARY PURPOSE: Low-grade lymphoproliferative disorders follow an indolent clinical course but are incurable with current therapy. Recently, three active agents for the treatment of these diseases have been identified: the purine analogs fludarabine, pentostatin and 2-chlorodeoxyadenosine. The purpose of this review is to summarize the current knowledge on the mechanism of action, clinical activity and toxicities of the purine analogs. METHODS: Articles, abstracts and letters to the editor appearing in English literature and involving the use of the purine analogs in the treatment of hairy cell leukemia, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, cutaneous T cell lymphomas and Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia were reviewed. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Purine analogs have marked cytoreductive potential in the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia, indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and hairy cell leukemia. Major side effects include myelosuppression and infections. Profound lymphocytopenia can be sustained, predisposing patients to opportunistic infections. Although remissions achieved with these agents can be long-lasting, minimal residual disease frequently persists. Postremission strategies aimed at eradicating such microscopic diseases can potentially improve the results of purine analog therapy. Alternatively, the up-front combination of these agents with traditional chemotherapy may lead to higher response rates and more sustained remissions.