1. A decade of progress in juvenile idiopathic arthritis treatments and outcomes in Canada: results from ReACCh-Out and the CAPRI registry.
- Author
-
Nguyen K, Barsalou J, Basodan D, Batthish M, Benseler SM, Berard RA, Blanchette N, Boire G, Bolaria R, Bruns A, Cabral DA, Cameron B, Campillo S, Cellucci T, Chan M, Chédeville G, Chetaille AL, Chhabra A, Couture J, Dancey P, De Bruycker JJ, Demirkaya E, Dhalla M, Duffy CM, Feldman BM, Feldman DE, Gerschman T, Haddad E, Heale L, Herrington J, Houghton K, Huber AM, Human A, Johnson N, Jurencak R, Lang B, Larché M, Laxer RM, LeBlanc CM, Lee JJY, Levy DM, Lim L, Lim LSH, Luca N, McGrath T, McMillan T, Miettunen PM, Morishita KA, Ng HY, Oen K, Park J, Petty RE, Proulx-Gauthier JP, Ramsey S, Roth J, Rosenberg AM, Rozenblyum E, Rumsey DG, Schmeling H, Schneider R, Scuccimarri R, Shiff NJ, Silverman E, Soon G, Spiegel L, Stringer E, Tam H, Tse SM, Tucker LB, Turvey S, Twilt M, Duffy KW, Yeung RSM, and Guzman J
- Subjects
- Humans, Canada epidemiology, Male, Female, Child, Treatment Outcome, Adolescent, Child, Preschool, Biological Products therapeutic use, Severity of Illness Index, Arthritis, Juvenile drug therapy, Registries, Antirheumatic Agents therapeutic use
- Abstract
Objective: To assess changes in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) treatments and outcomes in Canada, comparing 2005-2010 and 2017-2021 inception cohorts., Methods: Patients enrolled within three months of diagnosis in the Research in Arthritis in Canadian Children Emphasizing Outcomes (ReACCh-Out) and the Canadian Alliance of Pediatric Rheumatology Investigators Registry (CAPRI) cohorts were included. Cumulative incidences of drug starts and outcome attainment within 70 weeks of diagnosis were compared with Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and multivariable Cox regression., Results: The 2005-2010 and 2017-2021 cohorts included 1128 and 721 patients, respectively. JIA category distribution and baseline clinical juvenile idiopathic arthritis disease activity (cJADAS10) scores at enrolment were comparable. By 70 weeks, 6% of patients (95% CI 5, 7) in the 2005-2010 and 26% (23, 30) in the 2017-2021 cohort had started a biologic DMARD (bDMARD), and 43% (40, 47) and 60% (56, 64) had started a conventional DMARD (cDMARD), respectively. Outcome attainment was 64% (61, 67) and 83% (80, 86) for inactive disease (Wallace criteria), 69% (66, 72) and 84% (81, 87) for minimally active disease (cJADAS10 criteria), 57% (54, 61) and 63% (59, 68) for pain control (<1/10), and 52% (47, 56) and 54% (48, 60) for good health-related quality of life (≥9/10)., Conclusion: Although baseline disease characteristics were comparable in the 2005-2010 and 2017-2021 cohorts, cDMARD and bDMARD use increased with a concurrent increase in minimally active and inactive disease. Improvements in parent and patient-reported outcomes were smaller than improvements in disease activity., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF