Search

Objective: To investigate the impact of glucocorticoids (GCs) and anti-rheumatic drugs on the lymphocyte activation gene-3 (LAG-3) and on programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) expression on synovial and peripheral cells ex-vivo., Methods: Synovial fluid mononuclear cells (SFMCs) from psoriatic arthritis (PsA, n = 26) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA, n = 13) patients, SFCs from osteoarthritis (OA, n = 5) patients and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) of healthy donors (n = 14) were co-cultured with GCs, glucocorticoid receptor antagonist RU486, methotrexate (MTX) and biologics. LAG-3 and PD-1 expressions on immune subsets were analyzed by flow cytometry., Results: GCs in PsA inhibited SFMCs growth vs medium (2.3 ± 0.4X105  vs 5.3 ± 0.7X105, respectively, p < 0.01) and markedly upregulated CD14+LAG-3+ cells (11.7 ± 2.4% vs 0.8 ± 0.3%, p < 0.0001, respectively), but not CD3+LAG-3+ and CD14+PD-1+ cells. MTX had no effect on CD14+LAG-3+ cells (0.7 ± 0.3%). The TNFi inhibitors, infliximab (IFX) and etanercept, but not IL-12/23i, upregulated CD14+LAG-3+ cells vs medium (2.0 ± 0.6% and 1.6 ± 0.4% vs 0.5 ± 0.1%, p < 0.03, respectively). SFMCs growth inhibition in both PsA and RA correlated with CD14+LAG-3+ cell upregulation (r = 0.53, p = 0.03). RU486 inhibited GC-induced CD14+LAG-3+ cell up-regulation in a dose-dependent manner compared with GC alone (5µM 5.3 ± 1.2% and 50µM 1.3 ± 0.5% vs 7.0 ± 1.4%, p < 0.003), but had no significant effect on CD14+LAG-3+ cells co-cultured with IFX. GCs in healthy donors' PBMCs upregulated the immune subsets CD3+LAG-3+, CD14+LAG-3+ and CD14+PD-1+ cells., Conclusion: This study proposes a novel regulatory mechanism of GCs and of TNFi mediated by LAG-3 upregulation in synovial monocytes and PBMCs. LAG-3 modulation may be a promising target for development of novel therapies for inflammatory arthritis., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

This paper aims to compare the cellular immune response to the SARS-CoV-2 BNT162b2 vaccine of pediatric patients with autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic disease (pAIIRD) and healthy controls. A prospective longitudinal study was conducted between April 2021 and December 2022 at the Tel Aviv Medical Center. Children <18 years, with pediatric-onset AIIRD and healthy controls, who have received at least two doses of the BNT162b2 vaccine, were included. Humoral response was evaluated by serum levels of anti-SARS-CoV-2 receptor-binding domain antibodies. Cellular response was evaluated by flow cytometry, measuring IFNγ and TNFα production by CD4+ T cells following stimulation with SARS-CoV-2 Spike peptide mix. The study included 20 pAIIRD patients and 11 controls. The mean age of participants was 12.6 ± 2.94 years, with 58.1% females. The cellular response to the BNT162b2 vaccine was statistically similar in both groups. However, the humoral response was statistically lower in pAIIRD compared with the healthy control group. There was no statistically significant correlation between the humoral response and cellular response. During the study period, 43.75% of AIIRD children and 72.7% of controls had a breakthrough COVID-19 infection (P = 0.48). Bivariate models examining the effect of the cellular response and presence of an AIIRD on breakthrough infections found no effect. Compared with healthy controls, pAIIRD demonstrated similar cellular responses. Patients showed reduced humoral response compared with healthy adolescents, but similar breakthrough infection rates. These findings may support the importance of the cellular response in protecting against COVID-19 infections., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Immunology. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Objectives: SLE is a multisystem autoimmune disorder known for its broad clinical spectrum. Recently, the European, British and Latin American rheumatology professional societies [EULAR, British Society for Rheumatology (BSR) and Pan-American League of Associations of Rheumatology (PANLAR)] published updated recommendations for SLE management. The objective of this study was to characterize the data supporting the updated recommendations, with the goal of highlighting areas that could benefit from additional high-quality research., Methods: References were compiled from the recently published EULAR, BSR and PANLAR SLE treatment recommendations. Data collected from each study included publication year, treatment regimen, study design, sample size, inclusion and exclusion criteria and relevant SLE diagnostic criteria. Studies with less than 10 patients and those that did not specify the SLE diagnostic criteria used were excluded., Results: Altogether, 250 studies were included in this study. The majority were prospective and retrospective cohorts (72%), with only a small percentage of randomized controlled trials (28%). The median (interquartile range) number of patients included was 37 (19-86). The revised ACR 1982 criteria were the most commonly used criteria for SLE diagnosis (52%), followed by the revised ACR criteria from 1997 (27%). Only a small proportion of studies included the use of disease activity scores when defining study population (15%)., Conclusion: Our study has indicated a scarcity of sufficiently powered high-quality research referenced in the recently published SLE treatment guidelines. Well-designed large-scale studies utilizing the updated 2019 SLE diagnostic criteria are needed to better inform healthcare professionals caring for patients with SLE., (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)