Search

Purpose: The development of recommendations for advancing automated i.v. medication compounding is described., Summary: Managing the shift from manual to robotic compounding of i.v. therapies requires an awareness of how automation affects practice and how to best implement robotics into current practice. An international panel of pharmacy professionals, researchers, and technology leaders with experience in i.v. robotics collaborated during a two-day meeting in August 2014 to define a general set of principles to broaden the understanding of the fundamental elements of robotic compounding worldwide. Participants were divided into four working groups (technology and safety; drugs and products; personnel; and facilities and quality) to analyze specific aspects of robotic compounding practice. The four working groups produced an initial list of 92 statements. This list was condensed to 35 statements by consolidating similar and overlapping statements from the different work groups. Participants were surveyed again to assess agreement with the 35 statements and solicit additional clarification. Respondents expressed full agreement with 25 recommendations. Six statements received one or more "don't know" responses, with all other respondents in agreement. Four statements had a combination of "don't know" and "disagree" responses. A total of 32 comments were recorded in free-text fields, including requests for clarification and suggestions for rewording the statements., Conclusion: An international panel of pharmacy professionals, researchers, and technology leaders with experience in i.v. robotics developed a set of 35 recommendations toward a better understanding of the role of automated i.v. compounding in hospital and health-system pharmacies worldwide., (Copyright © 2017 by the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Ultraviolet (UV) irradiation efficacy in the intravenous compounding robot APOTECAchemo was evaluated to define the best operative conditions in terms of sterility and time optimization., Design: The challenge test was used against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus subtilis spores and Candida albicans. Inoculated plates were placed inside the robot and irradiated for different times. Microbial air and surface quality inside the equipment were monitored utilizing settle and contact plates, swabs., Results: After 4 h, no microorganisms were viable with killing rates ranging from 5- to 7-log for different microorganisms after 1 h of exposition. In confirmation of the efficacy of the UV irradiation program adopted, the microbial monitoring inside the equipment always gave negative results., Conclusions: This is the first exhaustive investigation of UV irradiation efficacy in the aseptic pharmaceutical production. We demonstrated that UV irradiation plays an essential role in maintaining the sterility condition of the workplace inside the APOTECAchemo and assuring the standards for aseptic manufacturing of medicinal drugs, as required for Class A clean areas. A 4-h UV irradiation also ensures sterility in the case of very resistant microorganisms and in the presence of high microbial charge (10(8) CFU/ml), but a killing rate of 5 or more is already recorded after the first hour of exposition. The results provide useful information for the best operative conditions in terms of both sterility and time optimization, not only for the automated compounding, but also for the traditional aseptic manufacturing processes., (© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press in association with the International Society for Quality in Health Care; all rights reserved.)

Purpose: The quality and economic implications of manual versus automated preparation of antineoplastic drugs were compared., Methods: This four-week study evaluated 10 routinely used antineoplastic drugs (fluorouracil, cyclophosphamide, gemcitabine, trastuzumab, bevacizumab, oxaliplatin, cisplatin, paclitaxel, irinotecan, and etoposide) prepared by manual and automated procedures. The accuracy of the dose of the active ingredient was calculated in terms of percent relative error for the difference between the nominal value indicated on the prescription and the actual value of the drug in the finished product. A comparative economic analysis of the manual and automated preparation procedures was performed by calculating the mean unit cost for each preparation at different production levels. Participating pharmacists and technicians completed a survey rating each preparation method in terms of performance, operator satisfaction, technology, and safety., Results: Of the 2500 i.v. antineoplastic preparations made in the pharmacy during the four-week study period, 681 were analyzed (348 using the automated procedure and 333 manually). Of these, 17 varied by more than 5% of the prescribed dose, and 1 varied by over 10%. Accuracy, calculated in terms of average percent relative error, was the highest and lowest during manual preparation. The preparation time for individual drugs was always higher when prepared using the automated procedure. A lower mean variable unit cost was observed for preparations made using the automated procedure. Questionnaire results revealed that operators preferred the automated procedure over the manual procedure., Conclusion: Both the automated and manual procedures for preparing antineoplastic preparations proved to be accurate and precise. The automated procedure resulted in substantial advantages in terms of quality maintenance standards and risk lowering.