Search

Study Question: Should testicular sperm extraction (TESE) in non-mosaic 47,XXY Klinefelter syndrome (KS) patients be performed soon after puberty or could it be delayed until adulthood?, Summary Answer: The difference in sperm retrieval rate (SRR) in TESE was not significant between the 'Young' (15-22 years old) cohort and the 'Adult' (23-43 years old) cohort of non-mosaic KS patients recruited prospectively in parallel., What Is Known Already: Several studies have tried to define predictive factors for TESE outcome in non-mosaic KS patients, with very heterogeneous results. Some authors have found that age was a pejorative factor and recommended performing TESE soon after puberty. To date, no predictive factors have been unanimously recognized to guide clinicians in deciding to perform TESE in azoospermic KS patients., Study Design, Size, Duration: Two cohorts (Young: 15-22 years old; Adult: 23-43 years old) were included prospectively in parallel. A total of 157 non-mosaic 47,XXY KS patients were included between 2010 and 2020 in the reproductive medicine department of the University Hospital of Lyon, France. However 31 patients gave up before TESE, four had cryptozoospermia and three did not have a valid hormone assessment; these were excluded from this study., Participants/materials, Setting, Methods: Data for 119 patients (61 Young and 58 Adult) were analyzed. All of these patients had clinical, hormonal and seminal evaluation before conventional TESE (c-TESE)., Main Results and the Role of Chance: The global SRR was 45.4%. SRRs were not significantly different between the two age groups: Young SRR=49.2%, Adult SRR = 41.4%; P = 0.393. Anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) and inhibin B were significantly higher in the Young group (AMH: P = 0.001, Inhibin B: P < 0.001), and also higher in patients with a positive TESE than in those with a negative TESE (AMH: P = 0.001, Inhibin B: P = 0.036). The other factors did not differ between age groups or according to TESE outcome. AMH had a better predictive value than inhibin B. SRRs were significantly higher in the upper quartile of AMH plasma levels than in the lower quartile (or in cases with AMH plasma level below the quantification limit): 67.7% versus 28.9% in the whole population (P = 0.001), 60% versus 20% in the Young group (P = 0.025) and 71.4% versus 33.3% in the Adult group (P = 0.018)., Limitations, Reasons for Caution: c-TESE was performed in the whole study; we cannot rule out the possibility of different results if microsurgical TESE had been performed. Because of the limited sensitivity of inhibin B and AMH assays, a large number of patients had values lower than the quantification limits, preventing the definition a threshold below which negative TESE can be predicted., Wider Implications of the Findings: In contrast to some studies, age did not appear as a pejorative factor when comparing patients 15-22 and 23-44 years of age. Improved accuracy of inhibin B and AMH assays in the future might still allow discrimination of patients with persistent foci of spermatogenesis and guide clinician decision-making and patient information., Study Funding/competing Interest(s): The study was supported by a grant from the French Ministry of Health D50621 (Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinical Régional 2008). The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., Trial Registration Number: NCT01918280., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology.)

Introduction: The counterfeit phenomenon is a largely under-reported issue, with potentially large burden for healthcare. The market for counterfeit drugs used in sexual medicine, most notably type 5 phosphodiesterase inhibitors (PDE5i), is rapidly growing., Aims: To report the health risks associated with the use of counterfeit medications, the reasons driving their use, and the strategies enacted to contain this phenomenon., Methods: A systematic scoping review of the literature regarding counterfeit PDE5i was carried between January and June 2021, then updated in August 2021., Main Outcome Measure: We primarily aimed to clarify the main drivers for counterfeit PDE5i use, the health risks associated, and the currently available strategies to fight counterfeiters., Results: One hundred thirty-one records were considered for the present scoping review. Production of fake PDE5i is highly lucrative and the lacking awareness of the potential health risks makes it a largely exploitable market by counterfeiters. Adulteration with other drugs, microbial contamination and unreliable dosages make counterfeit medications a cause of worry also outside of the sexual medicine scope. Several laboratory techniques have been devised to identify and quantify the presence of other compounds in counterfeit medications. Strategies aimed at improving awareness, providing antitampering packaging and producing non-falsifiable products, such as the orodispersible formulations, are also described., Clinical Implications: Improving our understanding of the PDE5i counterfeit phenomenon can be helpful to promote awareness of this issue and to improve patient care., Strengths & Limitations: Despite the systematic approach, few clinical studies were retrieved, and data concerning the prevalence of counterfeit PDE5i use is not available on a global scale., Conclusion: The counterfeit phenomenon is a steadily growing issue, with PDE5i being the most counterfeited medication with potentially large harmful effects on unaware consumers. Sansone A, Cuzin B, and Jannini EA. Facing Counterfeit Medications in Sexual Medicine. A Systematic Scoping Review on Social Strategies and Technological Solutions. Sex Med 2021;9:100437., (Copyright © 2021 International Society for Sexual Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Context: Testicular sperm extraction (TESE) in adult patients with nonmosaic 47,XXY provides a sperm retrieval rate (SRR) of approximately 50%. Age is the only significant prognostic factor. Whether TESE should be performed in adolescent patients for sperm cryopreservation remains to be determined., Objective: The objective of the study was to compare SRR between young (15-23 y) and adult (> 23 y) patients with 47,XXY, and to determine whether previous androgenic treatment had a deleterious effect., Design: We designed a prospective comparative study between two groups enrolled in parallel from September 2010 onward., Setting: University hospital., Patients: Forty one patients with nonmosaic 47,XXY karyotype and azoospermia were included. Twenty five patients from 15-22 years of age were assigned to the "Young" group, and 16 patients age 23 years or more, to the "Adult" group., Intervention: A bilateral testicular open biopsy was performed by a single surgeon. The reproductive biologist who performed TESE was blind to the patient's age. Principal Outcome Measure: The main outcome measure was the SRR. The TESE procedure was considered positive if at least 20 sperm cells could be cryopreserved for intracytoplasmic sperm injection., Results: SRR was 13/25 = 52% in the Young group and 10/16 = 62.5% in the Adult group, the difference being nonsignificant (P = .73). Ages were 24.3 ± 7.4 years in the 23 cases of positive TESE, and 23.7 ± 7.4 in the 18 cases of negative TESE, the difference being nonsignificant (P = .42). SRR was 9/17 = 52.9% for patients with and 14/24 = 59.1% for patients without previous testosterone (T) treatment, the difference being nonsignificant (P = .98)., Conclusions: According to the present results, performing TESE at a younger age (15-23 y) in patients with azoospermic nonmosaic 47,XXY Klinefelter did not increase SRR relative to adult patients (25-39 y). Previous replacement treatment with moderate doses of T did not seem to be deleterious for the recovery of sperm cells by TESE.

Introduction: Collagenase clostridium histolyticum (CCH; Xiaflex, Auxilium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Chesterbrook, PA, USA) is a Food and Drug Administration-approved, intralesional treatment for Peyronie's disease (PD)., Aim: The aim of this study was to assess the safety and effectiveness of CCH in the treatment of PD., Methods: This phase 3, open-label study enrolled subjects who were CCH-naïve, were enrolled in a previous pharmacokinetic study, or had received placebo in an earlier phase 2 CCH study. Each treatment cycle included two intralesional injections of CCH 0.58 mg, approximately 24-72 hours apart, and plaque modeling 24-72 hours after the second injection of each cycle. The treatment cycle was repeated after 6 weeks for ≤4 treatment cycles., Main Outcome Measures: The co-primary end points were the mean percent change in penile curvature deformity and the mean improvement in PD bother score (range 0-16) from baseline to week 36., Results: Of the 347 subjects treated with ≥1 injection, 238 had both a penile curvature measurement and a Peyronie's Disease Questionnaire response at baseline and ≥1 subsequent time point. Mean baseline penile curvature deformity was 53.0° and mean PD symptom bother was 7.3. Statistically significant mean improvements from baseline to week 36 were observed in both penile curvature deformity (34.4% [95% confidence interval {CI}, 31.2%, 37.6%]) and PD symptom bother score (3.3 [95% CI, 2.8, 3.7]). Most adverse events (AEs) were mild or moderate in severity and local to the penis. There were three serious treatment-related AEs, two penile hematomas and one corporal rupture; all resolved with treatment., Conclusions: Potentially clinically meaningful and statistically significant improvements in penile curvature deformity and PD symptom bother scores were observed with intralesional injection of CCH compared with baseline in men with PD. CCH was generally well tolerated, with AEs primarily transient and local to injection site. In conjunction with previous studies, the results of this open-label study support the use of CCH in the treatment of PD., (© 2014 International Society for Sexual Medicine.)

Introduction: Addition of testosterone (T) may improve the action of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5-Is) in patients with erectile dysfunction not responding to PDE5-Is with low or low-normal T levels., Aims: To confirm this add-on effect of T in men optimally treated with PDE5-Is and to specify the baseline T levels at which such an effect becomes significant., Methods: A multicenter, multinational, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of 173 men, 45-80 years, nonresponders to treatment with different PDE5-Is, with baseline total T levels ≤ 4 ng/mL or bioavailable T ≤ 1 ng/mL. Men were first treated with tadalafil 10 mg once a day (OAD) for 4 weeks; if not successful, they were randomized in a double-blind, placebo-controlled design to receive placebo or a 1% hydroalcoholic T gel (50 mg/5 g gel), to be increased to 10 mg T if results were clinically unsatisfactory. Main Outcomes Measures.  Mean change from baseline in the Erectile Function Domain Score of the International Index of Erectile Function and rate of successful intercourses (Sexual Encounter Profile 3 question)., Results: Erectile function progressively improved over a period of at least 12 weeks in both the placebo and T treatment groups. In the overall population with a mean baseline T level of 3.37 ± 1.48 ng/mL, no additional effect of T administration to men optimally treated with PDE5-Is was encountered. The differences between the T and placebo groups were significant for both criteria only in the men with baseline T ≤ 3 ng/mL., Conclusions: The maximal beneficial effects of OAD dosing with 10 mg tadalafil may occur only after as many as 12 weeks. Furthermore, addition of T to this PDE5-I regimen is beneficial, but only in hypogonadal men with baseline T levels ≤ 3 ng/mL., (© 2010 International Society for Sexual Medicine.)

Introduction: Women's quality of sexual life is strongly impaired by erectile dysfunction (ED). Women's involvement in ED treatment is important for compliance and long-term efficacy but remains difficult. The Index of Sexual Life (ISL), specific of the quality of sexual life of women with ED partners, is used here to assess the impact of ED treatment on female partners., Aim: The study explored in a context close to routine clinical practice the effect of sildenafil citrate (Viagra(R); Pfizer, New York, NY, USA) treatment on women's quality of sexual life, in parallel with men's ED evaluations., Methods: This prospective, open-labeled clinical trial was performed in France in 2006. Sexologists and andrologists recruited 67 volunteer couples for a 14-week sildenafil citrate treatment of male partners, without sex therapy in parallel., Main Outcome Measures: Women's quality of sexual life using ISL, and men's ED using International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) and Self-Esteem And Relationship (SEAR) were assessed at baseline and at the end of the study. Satisfaction for treatment was measured using Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction (EDITS) and EDITS Partner., Results: The ISL sexual life satisfaction score was low at baseline (12.3), and increased by 8.3 during the study (P < 0.0001). Women were 79.0% to be responders according to ISL assessment. The other ISL dimensions also improved. The final ISL sexual life satisfaction score was dependant on women's age and final IIEF scores. The observed correlations between the ISL sexual life satisfaction dimension and the IIEF erectile function dimension, and the SEAR confidence dimension confirmed our assumptions. Both partners were highly satisfied with the treatment., Conclusion: Women satisfaction with their sex life was improved by ED treatment (sildenafil citrate). Couple global caring seemed to amplify the well-known effect of ED treatment for men. The ISL could be a useful tool to help women in their partner's treatment and to integrate ED treatment in a couple approach.

Introduction: Vardenafil is a potent and selective phosphodiesterase 5 (PDE5) inhibitor developed for the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED). Fixed-dose and flexible-dose studies have previously established the efficacy and tolerability of vardenafil., Aim: To assess, besides the usual measures of efficacy, the quality of erection, satisfaction with the sexual experience, symptoms of depression, and overall confidence., Methods: This 12-week double-blind, placebo-controlled flexible-dose study assessed patients from the general ED population. Patients underwent a 4-week treatment-free period before randomization to vardenafil or matching placebo. Initial dosage was vardenafil 10 mg for 4 weeks. At 4 weeks, patients could switch to 5 or 20 mg (or corresponding placebo), or remain on 10 mg for an additional 4 weeks; dose switching was also optional for the last 4 weeks. This paper describes per-patient success in satisfaction with hardness of erection, satisfaction with overall sexual experience, effect on overall self-confidence, and an assessment of symptoms of depression using the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale., Results: Mean per-patient satisfaction rates with erection hardness increased after vardenafil treatment to 43%, 59%, and 63% at weeks 4, 8, and 12, respectively, compared to placebo with 10%, 21%, and 23% (all P < 0.005 vs. placebo). Vardenafil also improved mean per-patient overall satisfaction 50-65% over the 4-12 week study period compared with 17-28% for placebo (P < 0.005). Symptoms of depression were statistically significantly reduced compared to placebo (P = 0.02); the effect was observed particularly in patients who were depressed at baseline (P = 0.01). Significantly more patients in the vardenafil treatment group reported improved self-confidence than those who received placebo (P < 0.005)., Conclusions: A flexible-dose regimen of vardenafil improved satisfaction rates, symptoms of depression, and self-confidence, providing patients with an effective ED therapy that contributes to overall improvements in sexual function and confidence.

Introduction: The optimal approach for identification and evaluation of the sexual problems in men and women in primary care or general medicine practice has not been consensed., Aim: To provide recommendations/guidelines concerning state-of-the-art knowledge for clinical evaluation and management strategies in the evaluation and treatment of sexual dysfunction in men and women, emphasizing evidence-based medicine and a patient-centered framework., Methods: An International Consultation in collaboration with the major urology and sexual medicine associations assembled over 200 multidisciplinary experts from 60 countries into 17 committees. Committee members established specific objectives and scopes for various male and female sexual medicine topics. The recommendations concerning state-of-the-art knowledge in the respective sexual medicine topic represent the opinion of experts from five continents developed in a process over a 2-year period. Concerning the Clinical Evaluation and Management Strategies Committee, there were 12 experts from five countries., Main Outcome Measure: Expert opinion was based on grading of evidence-based medical literature, widespread internal committee discussion, public presentation and debate., Results: Three concepts underlie sexual medicine management: (i) adoption of a patient-centered framework for evaluation and treatment; (ii) application of the principles of evidence-based medicine in diagnostic and treatment planning; and (iii) use of a unified management approach in men and women. When taken together, these three principles provide a balanced and integrated approach to sexual dysfunction management. Common algorithms for diagnosis and management of men and women with sexual dysfunction, brief sexual symptom checklists, basics in history and physical examination, indications for specialized referral and development of a follow-up strategy are presented., Conclusions: More research is needed in understanding the role of evidence-based and patient-centered medicine in the clinical evaluation and management strategies of men and women with sexual dysfunction.

Background: Erectile dysfunction (ED) is common in men with renal failure, but is not always alleviated following kidney transplant. The objective of the present study was to assess the feasibility in renal transplant patients of sildenafil citrate treatment, an agent with proven efficacy in the management of ED., Methods: This was a phase IV, open, multicentre, 3 month, dose-escalation study. All patients meeting the inclusion criteria were prescribed a dose of 50 mg sildenafil at the first visit. Thereafter the dose could be increased to 100 mg or reduced to 25 mg based on efficacy or tolerability. The primary efficacy parameter assessed the ability of patients to achieve erections sufficient for intercourse and to maintain erections after penetration. Secondary endpoints assessed patient satisfaction with sildenafil and the effect of sildenafil on their quality of life. Patients were carefully monitored throughout the study for adverse events, interactions with immunosuppressive therapy and effect on graft function., Results: The study included 50 patients in the intent-to-treat population. Sildenafil significantly improved patient's erection ability and the frequency of their erection maintenance. Analysis of the secondary efficacy parameters revealed that 66% of patients believed treatment had improved their erections. Patients reported improvements in their sexual life and partner relationships and a high level of satisfaction with treatment. There were no interactions between sildenafil and the immunosuppressive drugs and there was no significant adverse effect of sildenafil on graft function., Conclusions: Sildenafil is an effective and well-tolerated agent for the treatment of ED in renal transplant recipients.