1. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Improves Early Breast Cancer Detection and Survival in Taiwan.
- Author
-
Wu PS, Hong YT, Shen CH, Lee CH, and Chou CP
- Subjects
- Humans, Female, Middle Aged, Taiwan epidemiology, Adult, Aged, Survival Rate, Breast diagnostic imaging, Breast pathology, Retrospective Studies, Breast Density, Breast Neoplasms diagnostic imaging, Breast Neoplasms mortality, Breast Neoplasms diagnosis, Breast Neoplasms pathology, Mammography methods, Early Detection of Cancer methods
- Abstract
Objective: Our objective was to compare the efficacy of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and digital mammography (DM) in breast cancer screening and their impact on long-term overall survival (OS)., Methods: The study involved 48 549 consecutive mammography examinations between 2011 and 2015 at a medical center in Taiwan, identifying 545 women who were screened and diagnosed with breast cancer. Digital mammography and DBT examinations were alternated on different days. Patients were categorized based on mammographic modality, breast density, and American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage. To determine the long-term outcome until August 2021, survival rates were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier (K-M) survival analysis., Results: The mean age at breast cancer diagnosis was 53.2 years. Digital breast tomosynthesis examinations were significantly associated with early breast cancer (AJCC stage 0 to 2) (P = .022). The 5- and 9-year OS rates for all patients were 96.8% and 93.0%, respectively. The 5- and 9-year OS was significantly greater in the DBT group (98.4% and 96.8%) compared with the DM group (95.0% and 90.4%) (P = .030 for all). The K-M survival analysis demonstrated a significantly higher OS in the DBT group than the DM group (P = .037). Furthermore, DBT significantly improved OS in a cohort of women with stage II and III cancer (P = .032) and heterogeneously dense breasts (P = .045)., Conclusion: Screening with DBT is associated with early breast cancer diagnosis and higher survival rates compared with DM., (© Society of Breast Imaging 2024. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF