Search

Ischemic vascular disease is a major cause of mortality and morbidity worldwide, and regeneration of blood vessels in perfusion-deficient tissues is a worthwhile therapeutic goal. The idea of delivering endothelial stem/progenitor cells to repair damaged vasculature, reperfuse hypoxic tissue, prevent cell death, and consequently diminish tissue inflammation and fibrosis has a strong scientific basis and clinical value. Various labs have proposed endothelial stem/progenitor cell candidates. This has created confusion, as there are profound differences between these cell definitions based on isolation methodology, characterization, and reparative biology. Here, a stricter definition based on stem cell biology principles is proposed. Although preclinical studies have often been promising, results from clinical trials have been highly contradictory and served to highlight multiple challenges associated with disappointing therapeutic benefit. This article reviews recent accomplishments in the field and discusses current difficulties when developing endothelial stem cell therapies. Emerging evidence that disputes the classic view of the bone marrow as the source for these cells and supports the vascular wall as the niche for these tissue-resident endothelial stem cells is considered. In addition, novel markers to identify endothelial stem cells, including CD157, EPCR, and CD31 low VEGFR2 low IL33 + Sox9 + , are described., (© 2021 The Authors. STEM CELLS TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of AlphaMed Press.)

Myeloid angiogenic cells (MACs) promote revascularization through the paracrine release of angiogenic factors and have been harnessed as therapeutic cells for many ischemic diseases. However, their proangiogenic properties have been suggested to be diminished in diabetes. This study investigates how the diabetic milieu affects the immunophenotype and function of MACs. Both MACs isolated from diabetic conditions and healthy cells exposed to a diabetic environment were used to determine the potential of MACs as a cell therapy for diabetic-related ischemia. MACs were isolated from human peripheral blood and characterized alongside proinflammatory macrophages M (LPS + IFNγ) and proangiogenic macrophages M (IL4). Functional changes in MACs in response to high-d-glucose were assessed using an in vitro 3D-tubulogenesis assay. Phenotypic changes were determined by gene and protein expression analysis. Additionally, MACs from type 1 diabetic (T1D) patients and corresponding controls were isolated and characterized. Our evidence demonstrates MACs identity as a distinct macrophage subtype that shares M2 proangiogenic characteristics, but can be distinguished by CD163 hi expression. High-d-glucose treatment significantly reduced MACs proangiogenic capacity, which was associated with a significant increase in IL1β mRNA and protein expression. Inhibition of IL1β abrogated the antiangiogenic effect induced by high-d-glucose. IL1β was also significantly upregulated in MACs isolated from T1D patients with microvascular complications compared to T1D patients without microvascular complications or nondiabetic volunteers. This study demonstrates that Type 1 diabetes and diabetic-like conditions impair the proangiogenic and regenerative capacity of MACs, and this response is mediated by IL-1β. Stem Cells 2018;36:834-843., (© 2018 The Authors Stem Cells published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of AlphaMed Press.)

Cell therapy using endothelial progenitors holds promise for vascular repair in ischemic retinopathies. Using a well-defined subpopulation of human cord blood-derived endothelial progenitors known as endothelial colony-forming cells (ECFCs), we have evaluated essential requirements for further development of this cell therapy targeting the ischemic retina, including dose response, delivery route, and toxicity. First, to evaluate therapeutic efficacy relating to cell dose, ECFCs were injected into the vitreous of mice with oxygen-induced retinopathy. Using angiography and histology, we found that intravitreal delivery of low dose (1 × 10 3 ) ECFCs was as effective as higher cell doses (1 × 10 4 , 1 × 10 5 ) in promoting vascular repair. Second, injection into the common carotid artery was tested as an alternative, systemic delivery route. Intracarotid ECFC delivery conferred therapeutic benefit which was comparable to intravitreal delivery using the same ECFC dose (1 × 10 5 ), although there were fewer human cells observed in the retinal vasculature following systemic delivery. Third, cell immunogenicity was evaluated by injecting ECFCs into the vitreous of healthy adult mice. Assessment of murine ocular tissues identified injected cells in the vitreous, while demonstrating integrity of the host retina. In addition, ECFCs did not invade into the retina, but remained in the vitreous, where they eventually underwent cell death within 3 days of delivery without evoking an inflammatory response. Human specific Alu sequences were not found in healthy mouse retinas after 3 days of ECFC delivery. These findings provide supportive preclinical evidence for the development of ECFCs as an efficacious cell product for ischemic retinopathies. Stem Cells Translational Medicine 2018;7:59-67., (© 2017 The Authors Stem Cells Translational Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of AlphaMed Press.)