Search

Background Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is thought to result in increased immune activation in people with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV, PWH). Although some data have linked asymptomatic CMV infection to cardiovascular disease among PWH, it remains unknown whether CMV is associated with increased or high-risk coronary plaque. Methods The Randomized Trial to Prevent Vascular Events in HIV (REPRIEVE) enrolled PWH aged 40–75 years on stable antiretroviral therapy (ART) with low-to-moderate atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk. Among a subset of US REPRIEVE participants, coronary plaque was assessed by coronary computed tomography angiography. Here, we assessed the relationship between CMV immunoglobulin G (IgG) titer and (1) levels of immune activation, (2) inflammatory biomarkers, and (3) coronary plaque phenotypes at study entry. Results Of 672 participants, mean age was 51 years, 83% were men, median ASCVD risk score was 4.5%, and 66% had current CD4+ T-cell count ≥500 cells/mm3. Higher CMV IgG quartile group was associated with older age and lower current and nadir CD4+ T-cell counts. CMV IgG titer was associated with specific inflammatory biomarkers (sCD163, MCP-1, interleukin [IL]-6, hsCRP) in univariate analysis, but not after controlling for HIV-specific factors. In contrast, CMV IgG titer was not associated with coronary artery disease indexes, including presence of plaque, coronary artery calcium (CAC) score >0, vulnerable plaque presence, or Leaman score >5. Conclusions No meaningful association was seen between CMV IgG titer and coronary artery disease indexes among ART-treated PWH at study enrollment. Longitudinal assessments in REPRIEVE will determine the relationship of CMV IgG titer to plaque progression and cardiovascular events. Clinical Trials Registration NCT02344290.

Background Emerging data demonstrate that the use of integrase inhibitor (INSTI)-based antiretroviral treatment (ART) is associated with increased weight, but the cardiometabolic health consequences of increased weight remains poorly understood. Methods This analysis examined INSTI use (>6 months) at entry among REPRIEVE participants enrolled in High Income and Latin America/Caribbean Global Burden of Disease regions. Primary analyses used linear and logistic regression; secondary analyses used quantile regression to examine differences across the full data distribution. Characteristics of those with and without INSTI use were balanced using inverse probability of treatment weighting. Results Among 4500 REPRIEVE participants, 1848 were on an INSTI-based regimen at entry for an average of 2.1 ± 1.8 years. Integrase inhibitor use (vs no INSTI use) was associated with higher odds of obesity (odds ratio [OR], 1.63; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4–1.9) and higher mean body mass index ([BMI] +1.5kg/m2; 95% CI, 1.0–1.9) and waist circumference (+3.6cm; 95% CI, 2.6–4.6). Differences in weight related to INSTI use were greater in the upper tails of the distribution (+3.1kg/m2 [95% CI, 1.9–4.4] at the 90th centile vs +0.7kg/m2 [95% CI, 0.2–1.2] at the 50th centile) and among women and nonwhite participants, with sex and race having an additive effect on BMI. Conversely, INSTI use was not associated with differences in glucose, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, or higher odds of metabolic syndrome or hypertension. Conclusions Differences in weight and waist circumference associated with INSTI use are (1) not uniform across people with human immunodeficiency virus, (2) greatest among women and nonwhites, and (3) concentrated at the upper tails of weight distribution. These data identify at-risk subgroups for whom long-term cardiovascular disease outcomes should be carefully assessed., INSTI-based regimens are associated with higher weight but not with increased cardiovascular risk for most INSTI users. Differences in weight are not uniform across PWH, and specific subgroups of INSTI users should be monitored for long-term CVD outcomes.

Background Monoclonal antibody therapy (MAT) was granted Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for treatment of mild to moderate coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in adults with positive SARS-CoV-2 viral testing and at high risk for progression to severe COVID-19 with up to 10 days of symptoms. This study assessed the impact of MAT on COVID-19-related ER visits, admissions, and mortality for patients diagnosed with COVID-19. Methods This was a single-center, retrospective study at The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center to compare COVID-19-related ER visits, admissions, and mortality at 30 days after receiving MAT in the outpatient setting with either bamlanivimab or casirivimab-imdevimab in adult patients diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 between November 16, 2020 and February 2, 2021. Outcomes in patients who received MAT were compared to those of a control group of patients diagnosed with COVID-19 in the outpatient setting from May 16, 2020 through November 15, 2020 who would have qualified for MAT through EUA criteria had it been available. Statistical analysis used logistic regression analysis with backward selection to determine the odds ratios (OR) and the 95% confidence interval to evaluate the relationship between patient clinical characteristics and outcomes. Results This study cohort included 1,944 patients, including 943 who received MAT and 1,001 in the control group. The MAT group included 658 who received bamlanivimab and 285 who received casirivimab-imdevimab. Patients who received MAT compared to the control group had a lower rate of COVID-19 related ER visits (3.3% vs 7.4%, p = < 0.0001) and hospital admissions (4.0% vs 7.8%, p = < 0.0001). No statistically significant difference was seen in mortality between the MAT group (0.5%) and control group (1.1%, p = 0.17). After accounting for potential confounders, the difference between the monoclonal antibody and control groups remained significant for ER visits and hospital admissions as reflected in the table. Conclusion Patients who received MAT for COVID-19 in the outpatient setting had a lower rate of COVID-19-related 30 day ER visits and hospitalizations compared to those who did not receive MAT, adjusting for potential confounders. Disclosures Mohammad Mahdee Sobhanie, M.D., Regeneron (Scientific Research Study Investigator)Regeneron (Scientific Research Study Investigator, Was a sub-investigator for Regeneron 2066 and 2069) Carlos Malvestutto, M.D., Lilly (Scientific Research Study Investigator)Regeneron Inc. (Scientific Research Study Investigator)ViiV Healthcare (Advisor or Review Panel member)

Background Limited options currently exist for treatment of patients diagnosed with symptomatic coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19). Monoclonal antibody therapy (MAT) has been investigated as a therapeutic option for symptomatic COVID-19 patients in the outpatient setting at high-risk for progression to severe disease based on emergency use authorization (EUA) criteria. No published studies have compared outcomes for patients treated with different MAT for COVID-19. Methods This was a single-center, retrospective cohort study at The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center to compare COVID-19-related emergency room (ER) visits, admissions, and mortality at 30 days after MAT infusion for adult patients with symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 between November 16, 2020 and February 2, 2021 who received bamlanivimab versus those who received casirivimab-imdevimab. Statistical analysis used logistic regression analysis to determine the odds ratio (OR) to evaluate the relationship between patient characteristics, MAT, and outcomes. Results The cohort included 943 patients with SARS-CoV-2 who received MAT, including 658 patients who received bamlanivimab and 285 who received casirivimab-imdevimab. Outcome results between patients who received bamlanivimab and casirivimab-imdevimab showed no statistically significant difference seen in the number of COVID-19 related ER visits (3.2% vs 3.5%, p = 0.80), hospital admissions (4.6% vs 2.8%, p = 0.21), or mortality (0.5% vs 0.7%, p = 0.63). Multivariate analysis showed no statistically significant difference in outcomes between the groups when accounting for potential confounders. As reflected in the Table, chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), gender, and asthma were associated with increased COVID-19 related ER visit within 30 days of infusion and age, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, CLL, and lupus were associated with increased risk for COVID-19 related admission within 30 days of infusion. Age and obesity with body mass index greater than 35 mg/kg2 were associated with increased risk for COVID-19 related mortality at 30 days. Conclusion COVID-19 related outcomes were similar when comparing patients with COVID-19 treated with bamlanivimab versus those treated with casirivimab-imdevimab. Disclosures Mohammad Mahdee Sobhanie, M.D., Regeneron (Scientific Research Study Investigator)Regeneron (Scientific Research Study Investigator, Was a sub-investigator for Regeneron 2066 and 2069) Carlos Malvestutto, M.D., Lilly (Scientific Research Study Investigator)Regeneron Inc. (Scientific Research Study Investigator)ViiV Healthcare (Advisor or Review Panel member)

Background Obesity is a global public health crisis with a growing prevalence in persons with human immunodeficiency virus (PWH) population. In this study, we aimed to investigate factors associated with weight gain in the PWH population. Methods This was a single-centered, retrospective cohort study of our clinic patient population from January 1, 2015 to January 1, 2019. Patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) were identified from the electronic health record and a randomized sample of 300 patients who had at least two follow up appointments, were on antiretroviral therapy, and had viral loads less than 200 were evaluated. The primary outcome was weight change over follow up. Cox Proportional Hazards models were used, taking a weight gain > 3 kg as the outcome, and the time on therapy between visits as the time to event. Robust linear regression was used to model mean changes in weight, accounting for influential observations. All analysis were performed in STATA 16.0. Table 1 Results At baseline, 87% were male, 63% were white, and 65% were overweight/obese. 30% were on a protease inhibitor, 46% were on non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor, and 37% were on an integrase inhibitor. 64% were on Tenofovir disoproxil (TDF), 8% were on Tenofovir alafenamide (TAF), and 19% were on Abacavir. Mean weight change over follow up was significantly increased at 1.31 kg (95% CI = 0.58 – 2.04 kg, p= 0.0004). TAF use and male gender were significantly associated with risk of weight gain > 3 kg in univariate analysis [respectively, OR = 2.53, 95% CI = 1.30 – 4.92, p = 0.006; OR = 2.60, 95% CI = 1.05 – 6.45, p = 0.04]. In multivariate analysis, TAF use was significantly associated with weight gain > 3 kg, while male gender was of borderline significance [respectively, OR = 2.29, 95% CI = 1.17 – 4.47, p = 0.01; OR = 2.40, 95% CI = 0.96 – 5.97, p=0.060]. Significant factors associated with weight change are noted in Table 1. Conclusion As PWH are living longer on effective ARV therapy, monitoring for weight gain is required as obesity contributes to morbidity and mortality from cardiovascular disease and metabolic diseases. Key factors for weight gain in our clinic population include male gender, baseline diagnosis of hypertension, use of TAF, bictegravir use, and rilpivirine use. Disclosures Carlos Malvestutto, MD, Gilead Sciences (Advisor or Review Panel member)ViiV Healthcare (Advisor or Review Panel member)