Search

Context: American Thyroid Association (ATA) guidelines do not consider age at diagnosis as a prognostic factor on the estimation of the risk of persistent/recurrent disease in differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC) patients. While age at diagnosis has already been assessed in high-risk patients, it remains to be established in low- and intermediate-risk patients., Objective: The aim of our study was to investigate the role of age as a prognostic factor in the short- and long-term outcome of DTC patients classified at low and intermediate risk according to the ATA stratification risk system., Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 863 DTC patients (mean follow-up: 10 ± 6.2 years) 52% classified as low (449/863) and 48% as intermediate risk (414/863). For each ATA-risk class patients were divided into subgroups based on age at diagnosis (<55 or ≥55 years)., Results: In the intermediate-risk group, patients aged 55 years or older had a higher rate of structural disease (11.6% vs 8.9%), recurrent disease (4.1% vs 0.7%), and death (4.1% vs 1%) when compared with younger patients (<55 years) (P = .007). Multivariate analysis confirmed that older age at diagnosis (odds ratio [OR] = 3.9; 95% CI, 1.9-8.6; P < .001) was an independent risk factor for worse long-term outcome together with response to initial therapy (OR = 13.0; 95% CI, 6.3-27.9; P < .001), and T (OR = 32; 95% CI, 1.4-7.1; P = .005) and N category (OR = 2.3; 95% CI, 1.1-5.0; P = .03). Nevertheless, a negative effect of older age was documented only in the subgroup of intermediate DTC patients with persistent structural disease after initial therapy. Indeed, the rate of worse long-term outcome rose from 13.3% in the whole population of intermediate DTC patients to 47.8% in patients with persistent structural disease after initial therapy (P < .001) and to 80% in patients older than 55 years and persistent structural disease after initial therapy (P = .02)., Conclusion: Our results suggest that age at diagnosis further predict individual outcomes in Intermediate-Risk DTC allowing ongoing management to be tailored accordingly., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Endocrine Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Context: Measurement of driver mutations in circulating tumoral DNA (ctDNA) obtained by liquid biopsy has been shown to be a sensitive biomarker in several human tumors., Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical relevance of pre- and post-operative ctDNA in sporadic medullary thyroid cancer (sMTC)., Methods: We studied pre- and post-operative ctDNA in 26 and 23 sMTC patients, respectively. ctDNA results were correlated to serum calcitonin (Ct), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), and other clinical/pathological features., Results: Twenty-six of 29 (89.7%) sMTCs were mutated either for RET or RAS and 3/29 (10.3%) were negative. Four of 26 (15.4%) cases showed positive pre-operative ctDNA with a significantly higher presence of RET M918T mutation (P = 0.0468). Patients with positive pre-operative ctDNA showed a higher variation allele frequency value of the somatic driver mutation (P = 0.0434) and a higher frequency of persistent disease (P = 0.0221). Post-operative ctDNA was positive only in 3/23 (13%) sMTCs and no one was positive for pre-operative ctDNA. Higher values of both Ct (P = 0.0307) and CEA (P = 0.0013) were found in positive ctDNA cases. Finally, the 7 cases harboring either pre- or post-operative positive ctDNA had a persistent disease (P = 0.0005) showing a higher post-operative serum Ct when compared with cases with negative ctDNA (P = 0.0092)., Conclusions: Pre-operative ctDNA in medullary thyroid cancer is not useful for diagnostic purposes, but it can be useful for predicting the outcome of the disease. In our series, post-operative ctDNA showed a potential for monitoring the response to therapies, but further studies are required to confirm our results., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Endocrine Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Objective: Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) causes acute respiratory distress syndrome. Patients with adrenal insufficiency (AI) may develop severe complications due to this infection and should undergo COVID-19 vaccination; however, there is no consensus about the management of their replacement therapy. The aim of our study was to evaluate the tolerability and need for glucocorticoid dose adjustment related to COVID-19 mRNA vaccines in a cohort of patients with AI., Design and Methods: We prospectively administered to 88 patients (51 M/37 F; mean age: 62.3 ± 16 years), with AI (28 primary and 60 secondary AI), a questionnaire about the occurrence, severity and duration of the side effects and the need for glucocorticoid dose adjustment within 1 week after the first and the second dose of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines (Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna)., Results: Side effects of mild to moderate severity occurred in about 70% of patients after both vaccine doses. The most common adverse events were pain at the injection site, fatigue, fever and flu-like symptoms. The occurrence and severity of the side effects were not correlated to gender, type of AI and mRNA vaccine, but their total number was higher after the second vaccine dose. Doubling the oral glucocorticoid dose was needed in up to 8% of patients, especially after the second vaccine dose, but no parenteral administration was required., Conclusions: COVID-19 mRNA vaccines were well tolerated in patients with AI. Side effects were similar to those observed in the general population, and increasing glucocorticoid replacement therapy before vaccine administration was not needed.

Context: Recently, the American Thyroid Association (ATA) and the European Thyroid Association (ETA) have proposed that thyroid ultrasound (US) should be used to stratify the risk of malignancy in thyroid nodules and to aid decision-making about whether fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is indicated., Objective: To validate and to compare the ATA and ETA US risk stratification systems of thyroid nodules in a prospective series of thyroid nodules submitted to FNAC., Setting: We prospectively evaluated 432 thyroid nodules selected for FNAC from 340 patients. Cytology reports were based on the five categories according to the criteria of the British Thyroid Association., Results: The proportion of Thy2 nodules decreased significantly, whereas the proportion of Thy4/Thy5 nodules significantly increased with increasing US risk class (P < 0.0001). The ability to identify benign and malignant nodules was similar between ATA and ETA systems. According to ATA and ETA US risk stratification systems, 23.7% and 56.0% nodules did not meet the criteria for FNAC, respectively. Considering only categories at lower risk of malignancy, the cumulative malignancy rate in these nodules was 1.2% for ATA and 1.7% for ETA US risk stratification systems., Conclusions: ETA and ATA US risk stratification systems provide effective malignancy risk stratification for thyroid nodules. In clinical practice, using this approach, we should be able to reduce the number of unnecessary FNAC without losing clinically relevant thyroid cancer.

Context: Fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is the gold standard for the differential diagnosis of thyroid nodules but has the limitation of inadequate sampling or indeterminate lesions., Objective: We aimed to verify whether search of thyroid cancer-associated protooncogene mutations in cytological samples may improve the diagnostic accuracy of FNAC., Study Design: One hundred seventy-four consecutive patients undergoing thyroid surgery were submitted to FNAC (on 235 thyroid nodules) that was used for cytology and molecular analysis of BRAF, RAS, RET, TRK, and PPRgamma mutations. At surgery these nodules were sampled to perform the same molecular testing., Results: Mutations were found in 67 of 235 (28.5%) cytological samples. Of the 67 mutated samples, 23 (34.3%) were mutated by RAS, 33 (49.3%) by BRAF, and 11 (16.4%) by RET/PTC. In 88.2% of the cases, the mutation was confirmed in tissue sample. The presence of mutations at cytology was associated with cancer 91.1% of the times and follicular adenoma 8.9% of the time. BRAF or RET/PTC mutations were always associated with cancer, whereas RAS mutations were mainly associated with cancer (74%) but also follicular adenoma (26%). The diagnostic performance of molecular analysis was superior to that of traditional cytology, with better sensitivity and specificity, and the combination of the two techniques further contributed to improve the total accuracy (93.2%), compared with molecular analysis (90.2%) or traditional cytology (83.0%)., Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate that molecular analysis of cytological specimens is feasible and that its results in combination with cytology improves the diagnostic performance of traditional cytology.

Context: One year after initial treatment, low-risk differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) patients undergo recombinant human (rh)TSH-stimulated serum thyroglobulin (Tg) (rhTSH-Tg) and neck ultrasound (US)., Objective: The need for more rhTSH-Tg in these patients is controversial. We evaluated the utility of a second rhTSH-Tg in DTC patients 2-3 yr after their first evaluation., Results: At the first rhTSH-Tg, basal and stimulated serum Tg was undetectable in 68 of 85 patients. Neck US was unremarkable in all but one, who had evidence of lymph node disease. Seventeen of 85 patients had undetectable serum Tg that became positive after rhTSH, with negative imaging in 10 and evidence of disease in seven. Patients with no evidence of disease were reevaluated 2-3 yr later (second rhTSH-Tg). In patients in which the first stimulated Tg was undetectable, all had undetectable basal serum Tg, which remained undetectable after rhTSH in 66 of 67 patients (98.5%) and became detectable in one (1.5%) (positive neck US). In the 10 patients with detectable stimulated Tg in the first test, basal serum Tg and US were negative at the second test, but rhTSH-Tg became detectable in six. Compared with the first rhTSH-Tg, the second stimulated Tg in these six patients decreased in one, increased in three, and stabilized in two patients., Conclusions: The second rhTSH-Tg was informative in patients who had first stimulated Tg detectable but not in those who had undetectable Tg at the first test, in which the only patient with recurrence was diagnosed by neck US. Thus, rhTSH-Tg should be repeated only in patients who have had a positive first rhTSH-Tg and negative imaging.