Search

Objectives: Despite growing evidence that aortic valve repair improves long-term patient outcomes and quality of life, aortic valves are mostly replaced. We evaluate the effect of aortic valve repair versus replacement in patients with dystrophic aortic root aneurysm up to 4 years., Methods: The multicentric CAVIAAR (Conservation Aortique Valvulaire dans les Insuffisances Aortiques et les Anévrismes de la Racine aortique) prospective cohort study enrolled 261 patients: 130 underwent standardized aortic valve repair (REPAIR) consisting of remodelling root repair with expansible aortic ring annuloplasty, and 131 received mechanical composite valve and graft replacement (REPLACE). Primary outcome was a composite criterion of mortality, reoperation, thromboembolic or major bleeding events, endocarditis or operating site infections, pacemaker implantation and heart failure, analysed with propensity score-weighted Cox model analysis. Secondary outcomes included major adverse valve-related events and components of primary outcome., Results: The mean age was 56.1 years, and valve was bicuspid in 115 patients (44.7%). Up to 4 years, REPAIR did not significantly differ from REPLACE in terms of primary outcome [Hazard Ratio (HR) 0.66 (0.39; 1.12)] but showed significantly less valve-related deaths (HR 0.09 [0.02; 0.34]) and major bleeding events (HR 0.37 [0.16; 0.85]) without an increased risk of valve-related reoperation (HR 2.10 [0.64; 6.96]). When accounting for the occurrence of multiple events in a single patient, the REPAIR group had half the occurrence of major adverse valve-related events (HR 0.51 [0.31; 0.86])., Conclusions: Although the primary outcome did not significantly differ between the REPAIR and REPLACE groups, the trend is in favour of REPAIR by a significant reduction of valve-related deaths and major bleeding events. Long-term follow-up beyond 4 years is needed to confirm these findings., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Multiplicity of aortic valve repair or sparing techniques results in a lack of standardisation, limiting widespread adoption of such procedures. To treat dilated diameters at the aortic annular base and sinotubular junction while maintaining root dynamics, we propose a standardised and physiological repair approach to the surgical management of aortic root aneurysms, consisting of root remodelling, cusp re-suspension and subvalvular aortic ring annuloplasty., Methods: From May 2003 to September 2009, 144 unselected patients with aortic root aneurysms underwent remodelling with external subvalvular ring annuloplasty in 13 centres (21 surgeons). Preoperative aortic insufficiency (AI) > or =grade 2 was present in 63.9% (92), Marfan syndrome in 12.5% (18) and bicuspid valve in 22.9% (33). Cusp repair was performed in 40.3% (58) patients., Results: Valve repair was successful in all but two cases. Repair of cusp prolapse was necessary in 58 patients, significantly more frequent in bicuspid (24/33, 72.7%) than in tricuspid (34/111, 30.6%) valves (p<0.05). Operative mortality was 2.8% (four). Subvalvular ring implantation produced a significant annular base reduction from 27.6+/-2.5 mm to 20.5+/-2.6 mm (p<0.01) without significant mean trans-valvular gradient (7.2+/-1.7 mmHg). During follow-up (median 2.2 years (0.75-4.4, maximum 6.25 years)), five patients died while eight required a re-operation. Six were operated on during our early experience. Strategy for cusp re-suspension evolved over three operative periods, with a significant increase in the rate of cusp repair. From May 2003 to December 2006: eye balling evaluation (15/67 (22.4%)); from January 2007 to August 2008: alignment of cusp free edges (17/38 (44.7%)); and from September 2008 to September 2009: a two-step standardised repair consisting of alignment of cusp free edges and effective height re-suspension (26/39 (66.7%) p<0.05). Freedom from AI> or =grade 2 was 91.3% (115) at the end of follow-up., Conclusions: Implantation of an external aortic ring provides a reproducible technique for aortic valve repair with satisfactory preliminary results. The ongoing CAVIAAR trial (Conservative Aortic Valve surgery for aortic Insufficiency and Aneurysm of the Aortic Root) will compare this standardised repair technique using an expansible aortic ring to mechanical valve replacement., (Copyright 2010 European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)