Search

Thoracic disk herniation is rare and difficult to treat. The minimally invasive lateral retropleural approach to the thoracic spine enables the surgeon to decompress the neural elements and minimize thecal sac manipulation through direct visualization with less exposure-related morbidity.To provide a detailed step-by-step overview of the minimally invasive retropleural approach for thoracic diskectomies, including preoperative planning through postoperative care as practiced at our institution.Lateral retropleural thoracic diskectomies performed at a single institution from July 1, 2017, to June 30, 2020, were reviewed. Clinical and outcome data were collected and analyzed. The retropleural approach was divided into several components: relevant anatomy, indications and contraindications, preoperative setup, exposure and approach, diskectomy, and closure and postoperative care.Twelve patients were treated during the study interval. Their average (SD) age was 44.2 (9.5) years; 10 of 12 were men. Eleven patients presented with thoracic myelopathy. The level treated ranged from T6-7 to T12-L1. Disk herniations were calcified in 10 of 12 patients. These lesions were approached from the left side in 7 of 12 patients. Six patients had complications, none of which were neurological. Chest tubes were placed for pleural violation, pneumothorax, or hemothorax in 3 patients. Two patients experienced postoperative abdominal pseudohernia. Neurological symptoms were stable or improved in all patients. The median (IQR) Nurick scale improved from 3.0 (2.0-3.0) preoperatively to 1.0 (0-3.0) ( P = .026) postoperatively.Lateral retropleural diskectomy enables safe, efficient resection of most thoracic disks while minimizing patient morbidity.

This was a retrospective cohort analysis.The objective of this study was to report the efficacy and safety profile of provocative discography.It is reported that the provocative discogram as a diagnostic test for symptomatic degenerative disk disease induces disk degeneration.Discogram cases from 1998 to 2011 were identified. A matched control group with no discogram was identified. Both had pre-magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and post-MRI with 5 years minimum between MRI studies. Statistics were generated by group for each level and for all levels combined.The discogram cohort comprised 53 patients (193 disks). The control group had 51 subjects (255 disks). There were no significant demographic differences between the groups. Time intervals between the index and follow-up MRI were 11 and 8 years for the discogram and control groups, respectively. The most common injected level was L4-L5; the most painful level was L5-S1 (Visual Analog Scale=7.9); the most concordant level was L5-S1 (75%). The most deranged level as seen on discography was L5-S1 (98%). Degeneration from normal to abnormal MRI among discogram patients was 60%. For controls, the rate was 33%. The discogram and control cohorts were statistically different (P0.01). Among discogram patients, 58% had a fusion surgery between MRI studies. Comparing the discogram group without interval fusion to controls, the degeneration rate was not different at a 5 years' minimum follow-up.The L5-S1 intervertebral disk level was the most painful, concordant, and deranged level as seen on discogram. Patients who underwent a provocative discogram and interval fusion had a higher rate of subsequent degeneration than similar low back pain sufferers with no discogram. Degeneration rates were comparable at 5 years' minimum follow-up between discogram patients without interval spine fusion and patients without discogram exposure. The provocative discogram did not accelerate degeneration among these patients.

Although approximately half of the patients undergoing lumbar disk surgery present with motor deficits, timing of surgery for radicular weakness is largely unclear.To evaluate the impact of surgical timing on motor recovery in patients with lumbar disk herniation (LDH) and to identify an ideal time window for intervention.In a single-center observational trial, 390 patients with LDH-associated motor deficits were prospectively followed for a minimum of 12 months after nonelective microscopic disk surgery. The duration of motor deficit before surgery was documented. Motor function was graded according to the Medical Research Council (MRC) scale. Statistical analysis of motor recovery applied unbiased recursive partitioning conditional inference tree to determine cutoff times for optimal surgical intervention. The slope of recovery calculated as the change of the MRC grade over time served as the primary outcome.A preoperative motor deficit of MRC ≤2/5 and the duration of paresis were identified as the most important predictors of recovery ( P.001). Surgery within 3 days was associated with a better recovery for both severe and moderate/mild deficits ( P = .017 for MRC ≤ 2/5; P.001 for MRC2/5; number needed to treat [NNT]2). A sensitivity analysis in mild motor deficits indicated a cutoff of 8 days.Timing of surgery is crucial for motor recovery in LDH-associated deficits. Immediate diagnosis, imaging, and referral should be aimed for to allow disk surgery within 3 days in patients with severe and moderate radicular weakness. If functionally disabling, even mild deficits may warrant decompression within a week.

This was a retrospective study.This study aimed to evaluate hidden blood loss (HBL) and its influencing factors in lumbar disk herniation (LDH) patients treated with percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy (PETD).PETD is a minimally invasive spine surgery and is widely used to treat LDH. It is generally believed that there is less bleeding during PETD. However, HBL during the perioperative period is always ignored.From January 2018 to March 2021, 74 LDH patients treated with PETD was selected. The patient's sex, age, height, weight, previous medical history (hypertension and diabetes) and other basic information were recorded. The preoperative fibrinogen (FIB) level, activated partial thromboplastin time and prothrombin time were recoded. The hemoglobin, hematocrit, and platelet immediately after admission and the next day postoperative were recorded. The surgical time, intraoperative blood loss, intervertebral disk degeneration grade and soft tissue thickness of the PETD approach were recorded. The total blood loss was calculated according to the Gross formula, and then HBL was calculated based on total blood loss and visible blood loss (VBL). The influencing factors were analyzed by single factor correlation analysis and multivariate linear regression analysis.Among the 74 patients, there were 34 males (20-68 y old) and 40 females (26-75 y old). The mean amount of VBL was (85.04±26.53) mL and HBL was (341.04±191.15) mL. There were statistically significant differences between HBL and VBL (P=0.000). Multiple linear regression analysis showed that sex (P=0.000), disk degeneration grade (P=0.000), preoperative FIB level (P=0.022) and preoperative platelet (P=0.026) were independent risk factors that contributed to HBL, but age (P=0.870), BMI (P=0.480), hypertension (P=0.867), diabetes (P=0.284), soft tissue thickness (P=0.701), preoperative prothrombin time (P=0.248) and preoperative activated partial thromboplastin time (P=0.521) were not.There was a large amount of HBL during the perioperative period of PETD in patients with LDH. Sex, disk degeneration grade, preoperative FIB level and preoperative platelet are the independent risk factors of HBL in the perioperative period of PETD. More attention should be paid to the patients with risk factors to ensure perioperative safety.

Background A recent randomized controlled trial (RCT), performed by the authors, comparing early surgical microdiscectomy with 6 months of nonoperative care for chronic lumbar radiculopathy showed that early surgery resulted in improved outcomes. However, estimates of the incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR), which is often expressed as the cost of gaining one quality-adjusted life year (QALY), of microdiscectomy versus nonsurgical management have varied. Radiculopathy lasting more than 4 months is less likely to improve without surgical intervention and may have a more favorable ICUR than previously reported for acute radiculopathy. Question/purpose In the setting of chronic radiculopathy caused by lumbar disc herniation, defined as symptoms and/or signs of 4 to 12 months duration, is surgical management more cost-effective than 6 months of nonoperative care from the third-party payer perspective based on a willingness to pay of less than CAD 50,000/QALY? Methods A decision analysis model served as the vehicle for the cost-utility analysis. A decision tree was parameterized using data from our single-center RCT that was augmented with institutional microcost data from the Ontario Case Costing Initiative. Bottom-up case costing methodology generates more accurate cost estimates, although institutional costs are known to vary. There were no major surgical cost drivers such as implants or bone graft substitutes, and therefore, the jurisdictional variance would be minimal for tertiary care centers. QALYs derived from the EuroQoL-5D were the health outcome and were derived exclusively from the RCT data, given the paucity of studies evaluating the surgical treatment of lumbar radiculopathy lasting 4 to 12 months. Cost-effectiveness was assessed using the ICUR and a threshold of willingness to pay CAD 50,000 (USD 41,220) per QALY in the base case. Sensitivity analyses were performed to account for the uncertainties within the estimate of cost utility, using both a probabilistic sensitivity analysis and two one-way sensitivity analyses with varying crossover rates after the 6-month nonsurgical treatment had concluded. Results Early surgical treatment of patients with chronic lumbar radiculopathy (defined as symptoms of 4 to 12 months duration) was cost-effective, in that the cost of one QALY was lower than the CAD 50,000 threshold (note: the purchasing power parity conversion factor between the Canadian dollar (CAD) and the US dollar (USD) for 2019 was 1 USD = 1.213 CAD; therefore, our threshold was USD 41,220). Patients in the early surgical treatment group had higher expected costs (CAD 4118 [95% CI 3429 to 4867]) than those with nonsurgical treatment (CAD 2377 [95% CI 1622 to 3518]), but they had better expected health outcomes (1.48 QALYs [95% CI 1.39 to 1.57] versus 1.30 [95% CI 1.22 to 1.37]). The ICUR was CAD 5822 per QALY gained (95% CI 3029 to 30,461). The 2-year probabilistic sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the likelihood that early surgical treatment was cost-effective was 0.99 at the willingness-to-pay threshold, as did the one-way sensitivity analyses. Conclusion Early surgery is cost-effective compared with nonoperative care in patients who have had chronic sciatica for 4 to 12 months. Decision-makers should ensure adequate funding to allow timely access to surgical care given that it is highly likely that early surgical intervention is potentially cost-effective in single-payer systems. Future work should focus on both the clinical effectiveness of the treatment of chronic radiculopathy and the costs of these treatments from a societal perspective to account for occupational absences and lost patient productivity. Parallel cost-utility analyses are critical so that appropriate decisions about resource allocation can be made. Level of evidence Level III, economic and decision analysis.

Retrospective cohort study.Compare rates of postoperative neural deficits between surgical approaches for thoracic disc herniations (TDHs).Anterior and posterior approaches for TDH carry high reported neurological risk, albeit comparative risk is not well defined.Health Care Utilization Project (HCUP) state inpatient databases (NY, FL, CA; 2005-2014) were queried for patients who underwent TDH operation. Demographics, operative details, surgical approach, neural injury, length of stay (LOS), and discharge location were assessed. Multivariate linear regression was used to determine relative risk of neural deficit and skilled nursing facility (SNF) discharge.Six hundred ninety-seven patients (mean age 52.0 yrs, 194 institutions) met inclusion. Majority of operations were elective (76.0%) and one to two levels (80.5%). Overall neural injury rate was 9.0%. Anterior operations had significantly lower rates of neural injury compared with posterior operations on univariate analysis (4.6% vs. 11.4%; P 0.01). All multilevel operations had similarly high rates of neural injury. On multivariate analysis, posterior approaches (RR 1.78; P = 0.12) and combined approaches (RR 2.15; P = 0.17) had higher neural risk compared with anterior approaches after controlling for younger age, higher Charlson Comorbidity Index, and nonelective admissions. Combined approaches had similar neural injury rates (13.8%) to posterior operations (11.4%) and significantly longer LOS and SNF discharges compared with single approaches. Neural deficit was associated with discharge to SNF (With = 87.3%; Without = 23.7%; P 0.01) and increased LOS (With = 12.5 days; Without = 6.9 days; P 0.01).Overall rate of neural deficit after operation for TDH was 9.0%. While anterior approach was associated with a lower neural injury rate, this association was confounded by age, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and admission type. After correcting for these confounders, a nonsignificant trend remained that favored the anterior approach. Neural deficit was associated with increased LOS and discharge to SNF postoperatively.Level of Evidence: 4.

Objective Epidural steroid injections (ESIs) are a commonly utilized treatment for lumbosacral radicular pain caused by intervertebral disc herniation or stenosis. Although effective in certain patient populations, ESIs have been associated with serious complications, including paralysis and death. In 2014, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a safety warning on the risk of injecting corticosteroids into the epidural space. The aims of this article were to review the neurological complications associated with ESIs and to compare the formulations, safety, and effectiveness of commercially available corticosteroids given by transforaminal (TF), interlaminar (IL) or caudal (C) injection. Methods Serious adverse events associated with ESIs were identified by search of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. A MEDLINE search of the literature was conducted to identify clinical trials comparing the safety and effectiveness of nonparticulate and particulate corticosteroid formulations. Results Neurological complications with ESIs were rare and more often associated with the use of particulate corticosteroids administered by transforaminal injection. Among the ten comparative-effectiveness studies reviewed, 7 found nonparticulate steroids had comparable efficacy to particulate steroids, and 3 studies suggested reduced efficacy or shorter duration of effect for nonparticulate steroids. Discussion The risk of complications for transforaminal ESI is greater with particulate corticosteroids. Nonparticulate corticosteroids, which are often recommended as a first line therapy, may have a short duration of effect and many commercial formulations contain neurotoxic preservatives. The safety profile of ESIs may continue to improve with the development of safer, sterile formulations that reduce the risk of complications while maintaining efficacy.

Radiculopathy is diagnosed using a combination of history, physical examination, and imaging. Unfortunately, well-established dermatomal and myotomal maps are an oversimplification of the convoluted nature of spinal sensory and motor innervation. When clinical presentation and imaging seemingly contradict one another, it is important to consider variant innervation patterns. This article presents three patients with objective dermatomal and/or myotomal deficits due to disc herniations whose clinical presentations are "textbook" for nerve root pathology that is adjacent to the nerve root that is actually compromised. In addition, the literature is reviewed to discuss the history of dermatomal and myotomal maps, the effectiveness of a clinician's ability to determine the precise pathologic disc and nerve root level in patients presenting with radiculopathy, and anatomical explanations as to why inconsistencies such as those seen in the patients in these cases exist.

STUDY DESIGN An ex vivo study of the rabbit's vertebral endplate. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to assess the effect of axial compression and distraction on vascular buds and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGFA) expression of the vertebral endplate (VEP). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA The abnormal load can lead to intervertebral disc degeneration (IDD), whereas axial distraction can delay this process. The effects of different mechanical loads on the intervertebral disc (IVD) have been hypothesized to be related to changes in the vascular buds of the VEP; moreover, the process that might involve the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) within the VEP. METHODS Rabbit spinal segments (n = 40) were harvested and randomly classified into four groups: Control group, no stress was applied; Group A, a constant compressive load applied; Group B, compression load removed for a fixed time daily on a continuous basis, and substituted with a distraction load for 30 minutes; and Group C, compression removed for 30 minutes for a fixed period daily on a continuous basis. Tissue specimens were collected before the culture (day 0) and on day 14 post-culture of each group for analysis of IVDs' morphology, and protein and mRNA expression of Aggrecan, COL2al, VEGFA, and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 of the VEPs. RESULTS Application of axial distraction and dynamic load compression significantly delayed time- and constant compression-mediated VEP changes and IDD. Moreover, the degree of degeneration was associated with loss of vascular buds, as well as the downregulation of VEGFA and its receptor. CONCLUSION The regulation of vascular buds and VEGF expression in the VEP represents one of the mechanisms of axial distraction and dynamic loading.Level of Evidence: N/A.

Study design Retrospective cohort. Objective To determine surgery-free survival of patients receiving conservative management of lumbar disc herniation (LDH) in the military healthcare system (MHS) and risk factors for surgical intervention. Summary of background data Radiculopathy from LDH is a major cause of morbidity and cost. Methods The Military Data Repository was queried for all patients diagnosed with LDH from FY2011-2018; the earliest such diagnosis in a military treatment facility (MTF) was kept for each patient as the initial diagnosis. Follow-up time to surgical intervention was defined as the time from diagnosis to first encounter for lumbar microdiscectomy or lumbar decompression in either a MTF or in the civilian sector. The Military Data Repository was also queried for history of tobacco use at any time during MHS care, age at the time of diagnosis, sex, MHS beneficiary category, and diagnosing facility characteristics. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate the associations of patient and diagnosing facility characteristics with time to surgical intervention. Results A total of 84,985 MHS beneficiaries including 62,771 active duty service members were diagnosed with LDH in a MTF during the 8-year study period. A total of 10,532 (12.4%) MHS beneficiaries, including 7650 (10.9%) active duty, failed conservative management onto surgical intervention with lumbar microdiscectomy or lumbar decompression. Median follow-up time of the cohort was 5.2 (interquartile range 2.6, 7.5) years. Among all healthcare beneficiaries, several patient-level (younger age, male sex, and history of tobacco use) and facility-level characteristics (hospital vs. clinic and surgical care vs. primary care clinic) were independently associated with higher risk of surgical intervention. Conclusion LDH compromises military readiness and negatively impacts healthcare costs. MHS beneficiaries with LDH have a good prognosis with approximately 88% of patients successfully completing conservative management. However, strategies to improve outcomes of conservative management in LDH should address risks associated with both patient and facility characteristics.Level of Evidence: 4.

Study design Retrospective register study. Objective The aim of this study was to assess the incidence and trends of lumbar disc surgeries in Finland from 1997 through 2018. Summary of background data The evidence on lumbar spine discectomy has shifted from supporting surgical treatment toward nonoperative treatment. Still, the incidence of lumbar discectomy operations increased until the 1990 s. In the United States, the incidence began to decline after a downward turn in 2008, yet recent trends from countries with public and practically free health care are not widely known. Methods Data for this study were obtained from the Finnish nationwide National Hospital Discharge Register. The study population covered all patients 18 years of age or older in Finland during a 22-year period from January 1, 1997, to December 31, 2018. Results A total of 65,912 lumbar discectomy operations were performed in Finland from 1997 through 2018. The annual population-based incidence of lumbar discectomy decreased 29% during the 22-year period, from 83 per 100,000 person-years in 1997 to 58 per 100,000 person-years in 2018. In addition, the incidence of microdiscectomy increased 12%, from 41 per 100,000 person-years in 1997 to 47 per 100,000 person-years in 2018, whereas the incidence of open discectomy decreased 71%, from 41 per 100,000 person-years in 1997 to 12 per 100,000 person-years in 2018. The total reoperation rate for microendoscopic, microscopic, and open discectomy surgeries was 16.3%, 15.3%, and 14.9%, respectively. Conclusion The nationwide incidence of lumbar discectomy decreased in Finland from 1997 through 2018. Additionally, the incidence of open discectomy is decreasing rapidly, whereas the incidence of microsurgical techniques is increasing.Level of Evidence: 3.

Study design An experimental animal study. Objective The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMF) on recovery of sensorimotor function in a rodent model of disc herniation (DH). Summary of background data Radiculopathy associated with DH is mediated by proinflammatory cytokines. Although we have demonstrated the anti-inflammatory effects of PEMF on various tissues, we have not investigated the potential therapeutic effect of PEMF on radiculopathy resulting from DH. Methods Nineteen rats were divided into three groups: positive control (PC; left L4 nerve ligation) (n = 6), DH alone (DH; exposure of left L4 dorsal root ganglion [DRG] to harvested nucleus pulposus and DRG displacement) (n = 6), and DH + PEMF (n = 7). Rodents from the DH + PEMF group were exposed to PEMF immediately postoperatively and for 3 hours/day until the end of the study. Sensory function was assessed via paw withdrawal thresholds to non-noxious stimuli preoperatively and 1 and 3 days postoperatively, and every 7 days thereafter until 7 weeks after surgery. Motor function was assessed via DigiGait treadmill analysis preoperatively and weekly starting 7 days following surgery until 7 weeks following surgery. Results All groups demonstrated marked increases in the left hindlimb response threshold postoperatively. However, 1 week following surgery, there was a significant effect of condition on left hindlimb withdrawal thresholds (one-way analysis of variance: F = 3.82, df = 2, P = 0.044) where a more rapid recovery to baseline threshold was evident for DH + PEMF compared to PC and DH alone. All groups demonstrated gait disturbance postoperatively. However, DH + PEMF rodents were able to regain baseline gait speeds before DH and PC rodents. When comparing gait parameters, DH + PEMF showed consistently less impairment postoperatively suggesting that PEMF treatment was associated with less severe gait disturbance. Conclusion These data demonstrate that PEMF accelerates sensorimotor recovery in a rodent model of DH, suggesting that PEMF may be reasonable to evaluate for the clinical management of patients with herniation-associated radiculopathy.Level of Evidence: N/A.

Study design A cross-sectional study of the Northern Finland Birth Cohort 1966 (NFBC1966). Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between the type, size, and location of lumbar Modic changes (MC), and prolonged disabling low back pain (LBP). Summary of background data LBP is the leading cause of disability worldwide and it affects all age- and socioeconomical groups. Only a small proportion of LBP patients are diagnosed with a specific cause: In most cases no single nociceptive cause for the pain can be identified. MC are visualized in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as a signal intensity change in vertebral bone marrow and have been proposed to represent a specific degenerative imaging phenotype associated with LBP. MC can be classified into several subtypes, of which inflammatory Type 1 (MC1) is suggested as being more likely to be associated with LBP. Methods We assessed lumbar MRI (n = 1512) for the presence, type, and size of MC. The associations of MC characteristics with prolonged (≥30 days during the past year) and disabling (bothersomeness of LBP at least 6 on a 0-10 Numeric Rating Scale) LBP, evaluated at the time of imaging at 47 years, were analyzed using binary logistic regression, adjusted for sex, BMI, smoking, educational status, lumbar disc degeneration, and disc herniations. Results Any MC and MC1 were associated with prolonged disabling LBP (odds ratio [OR] after full adjustments 1.50 [95% confidence interval, CI 1.05-2.15] and 1.50 [95% CI 1.10-2.05], respectively). Furthermore, MC covering the whole anterior-posterior direction or the whole endplate, as well as the height of MC, were significantly associated with prolonged disabling LBP (OR after full adjustments 1.59 [95% CI 1.14-2.20], 1.67 [95% CI 1.13-2.46] and 1.26 [95% CI 1.13-1.42], respectively). Conclusion Our study showed a significant and independent association between MC and clinically relevant LBP. Level of evidence 3.

A prospective cross-sectional study.To evaluate the prevalence of sacroiliac joint dysfunction in patients with lumbar disc hernia and examine the variations in clinical parameters cause by this combination.Although one of the many agents leading to lumbar pain is sacroiliac dysfunction, little progress has still been made to evaluate mechanical pain from sacroiliac joint dysfunction within the context of differential diagnosis of lumbar pain.Two hundred thirty-four patients already diagnosed with lumbar disc hernia were included in the study. During the evaluation, sacroiliac joint dysfunction was investigated using specific tests, pain levels with a Visual Analog Scale, and the presence of neuropathic pain using Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs Pain Scale. Other clinical assessments were performed using the Beck Depression Inventory, Health Assessment Questionnaire, and Tampa Kinesiophobia Scale.63.2% of patients were female and 36.8% were male. Mean age was 46.72 ± 11.14 years. The level of sacroiliac joint dysfunction was 33.3% in the research population. In terms of sex distribution, the proportion of women was higher in the group with sacroiliac joint dysfunction (P 0.05). No significant difference was observed in pain intensity assessed using a Visual Pain Scale between the groups (P 0.05), but the level of neuropathic pain was significantly higher in the group with dysfunction (P 0.05). In the group with sacroiliac joint dysfunction, the presence of depression was significantly higher (P = 0.009), functional capacity was worse (P 0.001), and the presence of kinesophobia was higher (P = 0.02).Our study results will be useful in attracting the attention of clinicians away from the intervertebral disc to the sacroiliac joint in order to avoid unnecessary and aggressive treatments.2.

STUDY DESIGN Prospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE The aims of this study were to evaluate the outcome of surgical and nonsurgical treatment for patients with lumbar herniated disc (LHD) or lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) after 2 years and to identify predictors for nonsuccess. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Studies regarding the clinician's ability to identify patients with a poor prognosis are not in concurrence and further studies are warranted. METHODS This study included 390 patients with LHD or LSS referred for surgical evaluation after unsuccessful conservative treatment. Nonsuccess was defined as a Roland-Morris Disability score above 4 (0-23) or a Numeric Rating Scale back and leg pain score above 20 (0-60). Uni- and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to investigate potential predictive factors including sociodemographic characteristics, history findings, levels of pain and disability, and magnetic resonance imaging findings. RESULTS Rates of nonsuccess at 2 years were approximately 30% in surgically treated patients with LHD, approximately about 60% in patients with LSS for disability, and 30% and 40%, respectively for pain. For the main outcome variable, disability, in the final multiple logistic regression model, nonsuccess after surgery was associated with male sex (odds ratio [OR] 2.04, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02-4.11, P = 0.04), low level of education (OR 2.60, 95% CI: 1.28-5.29, P = 0.01), high pain intensity (OR 3.06, 95% CI: 1.51-6.21, P

STUDY DESIGN A biomechanical analysis correlating internal disc strains and tissue damage during simulated repetitive lifting. OBJECTIVE To understand the failure modes during simulated safe and unsafe repetitive lifting. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Repetitive lifting has been shown to lead to lumbar disc herniation (LDH). In vitro studies have developed a qualitative understanding of the effect of repetitive loading on LDH. However, no studies have measured internal disc strains and subsequently correlated these with disc damage. METHODS Thirty human cadaver lumbar functional spinal units were subjected to an equivalent of 1 year of simulated repetitive lifting under safe and unsafe levels of compression, in combination with flexion (13-15°), and right axial rotation (2°) for 20,000 cycles or until failure. Safe or unsafe lifting were applied as a compressive load to mimic holding a 20 kg weight either close to, or at arm's length, from the body, respectively. Maximum shear strains (MSS) were measured, and disc damage scores were determined in nine regions from axial post-test magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and macroscopic images. RESULTS Twenty percent of specimens in the safe lifting group failed before 20,000 cycles due to endplate failure, compared with 67% in the unsafe group. Over half of the specimens in the safe lifting group failed via either disc protrusion or LDH, compared with only 20% via protrusion in the unsafe group. Significant positive correlations were found between MRI and macroscopic damage scores in all regions (rs > 0.385, P

MINI: We summarized the 10-year outcomes of Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial for intervertebral disc herniation through a systematic review. The observational cohort 2-year analysis and the as-treated analysis of the randomized control trial at 4 and 8 years showed statistically greater improvements in those patients who were treated surgically.We performed a comprehensive search of Pubmed, MEDLINE, and EMBASE for English-language studies of all levels of evidence pertaining to SPORT, in accordance with Preferred Reported Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.We aim to summarize the 10-year clinical outcomes of SPORT and its numerous follow-up studies for intervertebral disc herniation.The Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT) was a landmark study. SPORT compared surgical and nonoperative management of the three most common spinal pathologies.Keywords utilized included: SPORT, spine patient outcomes research trial, disc herniation, and surgical outcomes.The observational cohort analysis revealed statically greater improvement in primary outcomes at 3 months and 2 years in patients who had surgery, while analysis of the randomized control trial cohort failed to show a significant difference based on the intent-to-treat principle due to significant patient crossover. However, 4 year and 8 year as-treated analysis showed statistically greater improvements in those patients who were treated surgically. SPORT's subgroup analysis evaluated important factors when considering the treatment of IDH, including patient characteristics, level of herniation, duration of symptoms, recurrence of pain, presence of retrolistheiss, patient functional status, effects of previous treatment with epidural steroid injections and opioid medication, outcomes after incidental durotomy, MRI reader reliability, reoperation rates, and risk factors for reoperation. The clinical impact of SPORT was also investigated and included comparison of SPORT patients to NSQIP patients to determine generalizability, outcome differences in SPORT's surgical center sites, patient preferences, patient expectations, level of education, and effects of watching an evidence-based video.Ten years after its inception, SPORT has made strides in standardization and optimization of treatment for spinal pathologies. SPORT has provided clinicians with insight about outcomes of surgical and nonoperative treatment of IDH. Results showed significantly greater improvements in patients treated surgically.3.We performed a comprehensive search of Pubmed, MEDLINE, and EMBASE for English-language studies of all levels of evidence pertaining to SPORT, in accordance with Preferred Reported Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We aim to summarize the 10-year clinical outcomes of SPORT and its numerous follow-up studies for intervertebral disc herniation. The Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT) was a landmark study. SPORT compared surgical and nonoperative management of the three most common spinal pathologies. Keywords utilized included: SPORT, spine patient outcomes research trial, disc herniation, and surgical outcomes. The observational cohort analysis revealed statically greater improvement in primary outcomes at 3 months and 2 years in patients who had surgery, while analysis of the randomized control trial cohort failed to show a significant difference based on the intent-to-treat principle due to significant patient crossover. However, 4 year and 8 year as-treated analysis showed statistically greater improvements in those patients who were treated surgically. SPORT's subgroup analysis evaluated important factors when considering the treatment of IDH, including patient characteristics, level of herniation, duration of symptoms, recurrence of pain, presence of retrolistheiss, patient functional status, effects of previous treatment with epidural steroid injections and opioid medication, outcomes after incidental durotomy, MRI reader reliability, reoperation rates, and risk factors for reoperation. The clinical impact of SPORT was also investigated and included comparison of SPORT patients to NSQIP patients to determine generalizability, outcome differences in SPORT's surgical center sites, patient preferences, patient expectations, level of education, and effects of watching an evidence-based video. Ten years after its inception, SPORT has made strides in standardization and optimization of treatment for spinal pathologies. SPORT has provided clinicians with insight about outcomes of surgical and nonoperative treatment of IDH. Results showed significantly greater improvements in patients treated surgically. Level of Evidence: 3.

Study design Retrospective study of prospectively collected outcome data. Objective The aim of this study was to investigate reoperation cases and determine whether or not the experience period of a single surgeon was associated with the causes of reoperations following lumbar microendoscopic discectomy for disc herniation (MEDH) and microendoscopic decompression for spinal stenosis (MEDS). Summary of background data There have been few studies that investigated reoperation cases following MEDH and MEDS. Methods Between June 2005 (first experience of MEDH) and September 2013, the same surgeon had been using MEDH and/or MEDS on 441 consecutive patients. The follow-up rate was 89.3%. The causes and rates of reoperations (RORs) were determined at 5 years after the initial operations. We also investigated the experience period of a single surgeon (EPS, interval between June 2005 and initial operation: median, 37 months). Results The 5-year reoperation rate for all patients combined was 12.4% (49/394). The main causes for reoperations were recurrence of disc herniation (ROR, 7.01%) and increase of postoperative spondylolisthesis and/or instability (ROR, 9/394 = 2.28%); two of the nine cases were caused by excessive decompression, and the EPSs were 11 and 16 months. The other causes for reoperations were postoperative epidural hematoma (ROR, 0.76%; median EPS, 20 months), insufficient decompression (ROR, 0.25%; EPS, 17 months), and residual segmental scoliosis (ROR, 7.69%); two segmental scoliosis cases did not provide relief from sciatica, and therefore L4/5 transforaminal interbody fusions were performed. Conclusion Postoperative epidural hematoma and excessive or insufficient decompression were often observed in the initial series of patients as the causes for reoperations. We think that it is important to be aware of and prevent such potential problems in any initial series of patients, as there are limitations to any surgical indications for the use of microendoscopic decompression for degenerative segmental scoliosis because of original traction and/or kinking of nerve roots. Level of evidence 4.

Percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (PTED) has become the standard surgery for the patients of lumbar disc herniation with the advantages of less trauma and rapid recovery. But still some patients have poor prognosis after PTED. A major risk factor associated with the poor prognosis may be the unfit function exercise.To discuss the effect of overall functional exercise process for PTED.In January 2019 to June 2020, a single center randomized controlled trial was proceeded. The patients scheduled for PTED were randomly divided into the experimental group, which received overall functional exercise and the control group, which received routine process. The overall process included advance, whole-course exercise and integrating of traditional Chinese medical methods. The general information, visual analog scale (VAS) score and Oswestry Dysfunction Index (ODI) score at each follow-up point perioperative period were compared between the 2 groups.There were no significant differences in the general information, the preoperative VAS and ODI. On the 3rd day after operation, the VAS of low back pain and leg pain in the experimental group were lower than the control group. One month after operation, the VAS of low back pain in the experimental group was lower than that in the control group. One to 3 months after operation, the ODI scores of the experimental group were better than that of the control group. There was no significant difference in modified MacNab index between the experimental group and the control group.Function exercise is important for the prognosis of minimally invasive lumbar surgery. The overall function exercise process perioperative is helpful to relieve the short-term pain of the patients and significantly improve the prognosis.

There are few effective conservative therapies for acute lumbar disc herniation (LDH), and the choice of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs is not recommended for all patients. The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of Yaobitong capsule with celecoxib capsule, and to further confirm the safety and efficacy of Yaobitong capsule.This study is a large sample multicenter randomized controlled trial. Eight hospitals served as sub centers to recruit patients. A total of 258 patients are divided into Yaobitong group and celecoxib group according to the ratio of 1:1. Celecoxib or Yaobitong capsule was taken orally for 14 days. Patients will complete the trial after 3 months of follow-up, and independent statisticians who are blinded to random assignment will analyze the data using SAS 9.3 software. The primary outcome was the visual analogue scale (VAS) score after 14 days of treatment, and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and SF-12 will be regarded as secondary outcomes. Safety indexes will be recorded before and after treatment, and adverse events (AEs) will be recorded throughout this trial.This study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of Yaobitong capsule in treating LDH. The experimental results will provide evidence support to treat LDH with Yaobitong capsule.

Self-gravitation traction is 1 of the most popular treatments for lumbar disc herniation (LDH). This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the self-gravitation traction device in the treatment of LDH and to confirm its positive treatment effect.This trial is designed as a pragmatic double-center, single-blind, and 3-arm (1:1:1 ratio) randomized controlled trial. The recruited patients with LDH will be randomly allocated to the intervention (traction weight is 40% or 60% of its body weight) or control (traction weight is 20% of its body weight) group. Traction will be completed within 6 consecutive weeks (3 times a week), with 10 minutes of traction for the first 3 weeks, 20 minutes of traction for the next 3 weeks. After the experiment is completed, we will establish an experiment-related database. The software of SPSS, version 21 (SPSS Inc. Chicago, IL) will be used for statistical analysis, and measurement data will be expressed via mean and standard deviation (mean ± SD).Once the trial is completed, we will publish the study in journals in both Chinese and English to promote the dissemination and use of the results. In addition, we also plan to promote the research results at various academic conferences both domestically and internationally.

To investigate the association between interleukin (IL)-1α (rs1800587), IL-1β (rs1143634) and IL-1 receptor antagonist (RN) variable number tandem repeat polymorphisms, expression levels and lumbar disc disease (LDD).All relevant articles were searched from 4 databases including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and China National Knowledge Infrastructure. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated to evaluate the association between IL-1 gene locus polymorphisms (rs1800587 in IL-1α, rs1143634 in IL-1β, variable number tandem repeat in interleukin-1 receptor antagonist) and LDD susceptibility. Statistical analysis was conducted by Review Manager (Revman) 5.31 software (Nordic Cochrane Centre, Cochrane Collaboration, Copenhagen, Denmark). Furthermore, qRT-PCR and immunohistochemistry were performed to evaluate IL-1α, IL-1β and interleukin-1 receptor antagonist expressions in the normal and degenerated disc.A total of 15 case-control studies (1455 cases and 2362 controls) were included in our meta-analysis. The pooled results suggested that IL-1α rs1800587 polymorphism was associated with an increased risk of LDD in overall population (T vs. C, OR = 1.21, 95% CI = 1.04-1.40, P = .01). The subgroup analysis found a significant association between IL-1β rs1143634 polymorphism and LDD in Asian population (T vs. C, OR = 0.61, 95% CI = 0.39-0.96, P = .03). Results of qRT-PCR and immunohistochemistry demonstrated that expressions of IL-1α and IL-1β were significantly increased in the degenerated disc. (all P.05).IL-1α rs1800587 and IL-1β rs1143634 polymorphisms were significantly associated with LDD in overall population and in Asian population, respectively. The increased expression levels of IL-1α and IL-1β may be the important risk factors for LDD.

Intervertebral foramen endoscopy has developed rapidly, but compared with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), the progress of degeneration is unknown. We aim to compare the changes of intervertebral disc and intervertebral foramen in adjacent segments after TLIF and endoscopic discectomy for patients with lumbar disc herniation (LDH).From 2014 to 2017, 87 patients who were diagnosed with single-level LDH and received surgery of TLIF (group T, n = 43) or endoscopic discectomy (group F, n = 44) were retrospectively analyzed. X-ray, MRI, CT and clinical symptoms were recorded before operation and at the last follow-up (FU). The neurological function was originally evaluated by the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores. Radiological evaluation included the height of intervertebral space (HIS), intervertebral foramen height (FH), intervertebral foramen area (FA), lumbar lordosis (CA) and intervertebral disc degeneration Pfirrmann scores.There was no significant difference in baseline characteristics, JOA improvement rate, reoperation rate and complications between the two groups. The age, average blood loss, average hospital stays and average operation time in group F were lower than those in group T. During the last FU, HIS, CA and FA decreased in both groups, and the changes in group T were more significant than those in group F (P .05). There was no significant difference in FH changes between the two groups (P .05).Both TLIF and endoscopic surgery can achieve good results in the treatment of LDH, but the risk of lumbar disc height loss and intervertebral foramina reduction in the adjacent segment after endoscopic surgery is lower.

BACKGROUND Multiple options exist for thoracic disc herniation (TDH). However, when a specific technique is chosen, the goal is to avoid the manipulation of the spinal cord, which is already compressed. OBJECTIVE To describe a hybrid endoscopic technique for intracanal TDH by combining an oblique paraspinal approach (OPA) and transforaminal full-endoscopic discectomy. METHODS We describe the step-by-step operative technique and present the clinical and radiological outcomes of a case series of hybrid endoscopic thoracic discectomy. RESULTS A total of 3 patients were treated. We observed the usefulness of an OPA to enlarge the intervertebral foramen through the rigid tubular retractor and the feasibility of a full-endoscopic transforaminal approach to reach intracanal TDHs. CONCLUSION Early experience with the hybrid endoscopic technique for TDHs demonstrated acceptable clinical and radiological outcomes in the 3 patients treated; however, a larger sample size and a methodologically advantageous study to compare this procedure with conventional options are necessary to probe the full benefits of the hybrid technique.

Retrospective cohort study.The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the regional variations in the use of nonoperative therapies in patients diagnosed with a lumbar intervertebral disc herniation 3 months prior to undergoing microdiscectomy surgery.Regional variations in the management of chronic pain conditions have been previously identified. Patients suffering from a lumbar intervertebral disc herniation are typically treated with a brief course of conservative management prior to attempting microdiscectomy surgery. Whether regional differences exist in the utilization or costs of maximum nonoperative therapy (MNT) remains unknown.Medical records from patients diagnosed with a lumbar intervertebral disc herniation undergoing 1, 2, or 3-level index microdiscectomy operations between 2007 and 2017 were gathered from the HORTHO insurance database consisting of private/commercially insured and Medicare Advantage beneficiaries. Patient regional designation was divided into Midwest, Northeast, South, and West territories and was derived from the insurance claim location. The utilization of MNT within 3 months after initial lumbar herniation diagnosis in adult patients was analyzed.Our population consisted of 13,106 patients who underwent primary index microdiscectomy surgery. Significant regional variation was identified in the nonoperative therapy failure rate (P0.0001), with the highest proportion of Midwest patients failing (2.7%). There were statistical differences in the regional distribution of patients utilizing NSAIDs (P0.0001), muscle relaxants (P0.0001), lumbar epidural steroid injections (P0.0001), physical therapy and occupational therapy sessions (P0.0001), chiropractor treatments (P0.0001), and emergency department services (P = 0.0049). The total direct cost associated with all MNT prior to microdiscectomy was $13,205,924, with 59.6% from the South, 31.1% from the Midwest, 8.3% from the West, and 1.1% from the Northeast.These findings indicate that regional differences exist in the utilization and costs of MNT of a lumbar intervertebral herniated disc prior to microdiscectomy surgery.3.

BACKGROUND Lumbar herniated nucleus pulposis (HNP) occurs infrequently in the pediatric/adolescent population. A minority of patients with radicular symptoms fail to improve with conservative management and require discectomy. The authors hypothesize that children who ultimately require surgical intervention have an underlying lumbar stenosis predisposing them to continued symptoms. METHODS Pediatric patients with a lumbar HNP on advanced imaging were retrospectively identified at a tertiary pediatric orthopaedic institution. Patients with spondylolisthesis, fractures, previous spine surgery, or structural thoracolumbar scoliosis were excluded. On sagittal magnetic resonance imagings, measurements were taken of the L4 and L5 vertebral body diameters (VBD) and canal diameters (CD) by 2 independent reviewers. Statistical analysis was performed using 2 sample T tests followed by logistic regression analysis. This was utilized to identify significant associations between CD and need for surgical decompression. RESULTS A total of 76 patients (37 males/39 females) were identified with a lumbar HNP from 2001 to 2016. Eleven patients underwent discectomy. Sixty-five patients were managed conservatively. Age at magnetic resonance imaging was not different between groups (15.1±1.7 vs. 14.9±2.2 y, P=0.82). VBD at L4 and L5 were not different between groups (P=0.2 and 0.36, respectively). The reviewers had fair to good (0.584-0.854) interrater reliability correlation coefficients. CD was decreased in the surgically treated cohort at L4 (11.6±1.6 vs. 14.2±2.1 mm, P=0.0002) and at L5 (10.1±1.3 vs. 14.2±2.2 mm, P

Study design Case series and review of literature. Objective To report three cases of vascular injury during posterior lumbar disc surgery, two of these occurred during open discectomy, and one during an endoscopic surgery. Aim is to highlight importance of early diagnosis and prompt steps taken to prevent morbidity and mortality. Summary of background data Vascular injury during lumbar discectomy is rare injury. Also no case has been reported so far occurring during an endoscopic discectomy. Methods Three patients were treated for lumbar intervertebral disc prolapse, two had undergone open posterior discectomy while the third patient underwent endoscopic discectomy and all of them were diagnosed to have suffered an abdominal vascular injury. Results In two cases pseudo-aneurysm was found while third case was diagnosed as an arterio-venous fistula. All the three cases were managed with endovascular stenting and followed for a minimum period of 2 years. No further complications were detected. Conclusion Vascular injury during a disc surgery is difficult to diagnose due to the rarity of occurrence and subtle signs which need to be recognized to start early management. Level of evidence 5.

STUDY DESIGN A retrospective study. OBJECTIVES (1) To assess the reliability of using the posterior endplate valley (PEV) to predict the cranial-caudal location of the cervical pedicle intraoperatively; (2) to assess the impact of age on the cervical PEV-pedicle relationship, interpedicular distance, and foraminal height. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA The cervical pedicle, which is the anatomic landmark defining the boundaries of the foramen, is hidden from view intraoperatively in the anterior cervical approach, potentially leading to incomplete foraminal decompression. An intraoperative landmark which heralds the location of the pedicle and therefore can be relied upon as a guide for decompression has not been previously described. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed cervical computed tomography images of younger ( 50 y) patients. Using the coronal reconstructed image taken at the posterior margin of the vertebral body, we constructed a line between the superior aspect of the pedicles and measured the distance from this line to the PEV. Interpedicular distance and foraminal height were also measured. RESULTS One hundred patients were included in the final analysis. The mean distance (mm) from the pedicular line to the PEV from C3 to C7 respectively was 1.0±0.99, 0.01±0.76, 0.09±0.70, 0.20±0.71, and 0.27±0.79. No significant difference between young and elderly patients was noted (P

STUDY DESIGN Surgical technique. OBJECTIVE Using an 8.4-mm endoscope and endoscopic nerve root retractor, the interlaminar endoscopic lumbar discectomy (IELD) technique is introduced for lumbosacral levels. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Although spine surgeons are familiar with IELD, this technique is only used for L5-S1 disk herniations and requires a wide interlaminar space. METHODS Using an 8.4 mm-endoscope, high-speed drill, and endoscopic Kerrison punches, a nerve-root retractor facilitated the simultaneous medial retraction of the nerve root and removal of the disk fragment by the instrument's cannula. Clinical parameters such the visual analog scale scores for back and leg pain, modified Macnab criteria, and Oswestry Disability Index were analyzed. RESULTS A total of 101 patients were enrolled. The visual analog scale scores for back and leg pain significantly decreased from 6.8±2.1 and 7.8±1.5 to 2.0±0.6 and 1.78±1.1, respectively, at the 1-year follow up (P

STUDY DESIGN A systematic review. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to determine the association between study outcomes and the presence of a conflict of interest (COI) in the lumbar disc arthroplasty (LDA) literature. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Previous studies have evaluated the efficacy of LDA as a surgical alternative to arthrodesis. As investigators may have financial relationships with LDA device companies, it is important to consider the role of COI on study outcomes. METHODS A systematic review was performed to identify articles reporting clinical outcomes of LDA. Any financial COIs disclosed were recorded and confirmed through Open Payments and ProPublica databases. Study outcomes were graded as favorable, unfavorable, or equivocal. Pearson Chi-squared analysis was used to determine an association between COI and study outcomes. Favorable outcomes were tested for an association with study characteristics using Poisson regression with robust error variance. RESULTS Fifty-seven articles were included, 30 had a financial COI, while 27 did not. Ninety percent of the conflicted studies disclosed their COI in the article. Studies with United States authors were more likely to be conflicted (P = 0.019). A majority of studies reported favorable outcomes for LDA (n = 39). Conflicted studies were more likely to report favorable outcomes than nonconflicted studies (P = 0.020). Articles with COIs related to consultant fees (P = 0.003), research funding (P = 0.002), and stock ownership (P

Retrospective analysis of clinical records.The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical outcomes and neurological complications of full-endoscopic visualized foraminoplasty and discectomy under general anesthesia for the treatment of L4-L5 and L5-S1 disc herniation.Full-endoscopic visualized foraminoplasty and discectomy, which is our newly developed technique, has been used in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation and lumbar spinal stenosis. While the clinical effect, safety, and neurological complications of full-endoscopic visualized foraminoplasty and discectomy under general anesthesia are still uncertain.Between May 2015 and April 2017, 84 patients with lumbar disc herniation were included, and categorized into L4-L5 group and L5-S1 group according to the discectomy segment. Full-endoscopic visualized foraminoplasty and discectomy was performed under general anesthesia. Operative time, fluoroscopy time, hospitalization time, and complications were recorded. Each patient included was followed for at least 12 months. Visual analog scale score for leg and back pain and Oswestry Disability Index score were evaluated preoperatively and at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. The modified MacNab criteria were also used to evaluate surgical effectiveness.The mean operative time, fluoroscopy time, and hospitalization time at L4-L5 and L5-S1 were of no significant difference. The mean visual analog scale and Oswestry Disability Index postoperative scores were significantly improved over the preoperative scores. Intraoperative nerve injury occurred in one case at L4-L5, with a neurological complication rate of 2.1% in L4-L5 group. One case at L4-L5 suffered recurrence 2 weeks after the surgery, resulting in a recurrence rate of 2.1% in L4-L5 group. This recurrence case was treated by a second full-endoscopic visualized foraminoplasty and discectomy under general anesthesia.Full-endoscopic visualized foraminoplasty and discectomy under general anesthesia is efficient and safe for the treatment of L4-L5 and L5-S1 disc herniation.4.

Brain functional network properties are globally disrupted in multiple musculoskeletal chronic pain conditions. Back pain with lumbar disk herniation (LDH) is highly prevalent and a major route for progression to chronic back pain. However, brain functional network properties remain unknown in such patients. Here, we examined resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging-based functional connectivity networks in chronic back pain patients with clear evidence for LDH (LDH-chronic pain n = 146), in comparison to healthy controls (HCs, n = 165). The study was conducted in China, thus providing the opportunity to also examine the influence of culture on brain functional reorganization with chronic pain. The data were equally subdivided into discovery and validation subgroups (n = 68 LDH-chronic pain and n = 68 HC, for each subgroup), and contrasted to an off-site data set (n = 272, NITRC 1000). Graph disruption indices derived from 3 network topological measurements, degree, clustering coefficient, and efficiency, which respectively represent network hubness, segregation, and integration, were significantly decreased compared with HC, across all predefined link densities, in both discovery and validation groups. However, global mean clustering coefficient and betweenness centrality were decreased in the discovery group and showed trend in the validation group. The relationship between pain and graph disruption indices was limited to males with high education. These results deviate somewhat from recent similar analysis for other musculoskeletal chronic pain conditions, yet we cannot determine whether the differences are due to types of pain or also to cultural differences between patients studied in China and the United States.

Animal experiment: a rat model of lumbar disc herniation (LDH) induced painful radiculopathies.To investigate the role and mechanism of AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) in dorsal root ganglia (DRG) neurons in LDH-induced painful radiculopathies.Overactivation of multiple pain signals in DRG neurons triggered by LDH is crucial to the development of radicular pain. AMPK is recognized as a cellular energy sensor, as well as a pain sensation modulator, but its function in LDH-induced pain hypersensitivity remains largely unknown.The LDH rat model was established by autologous nucleus pulposus transplantation into the right lumbar 5 (L5) nerve root. At different time points after AMPK agonist metformin (250 mg/kg/d) or mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor rapamycin (5 mg/kg) intraperitoneal administration, thermal and mechanical sensitivity were evaluated by measuring paw withdrawal latency (PWL) and 50% paw withdrawal thresholds (PWT). The levels of AMPK, mTOR, and p70S6K phosphorylation were determined by Western blot. We also investigated the proportion of p-AMPK positive neurons in the right L5 DRG neurons using immunofluorescence.LDH evoked persistent thermal hyperalgesia and mechanical allodynia on the ipsilateral paw, as indicated by the decreased PWL and 50% PWT. These pain hypersensitive behaviors were accompanied with significant inhibition of AMPK and activation of mTOR in the associated DRG neurons. Pharmacological activation of AMPK in the DRG neurons not only suppressed mTOR/p70S6K signaling, but also alleviated LDH-induced pain hypersensitive behaviors.We provide a molecular mechanism for the activation of pain signals based on AMPK-mTOR axis, as well as an intervention strategy by targeting AMPK-mTOR axis in LDH-induced painful radiculopathies.N/A.

Study design: A controlled radiologic follow-up study. Objective: The aim of this study was to ascertain whether changes in cord excursion with straight leg raise test (SLR) at 1.5-year follow- up time accompany changes in clinical symptoms. Summary of background data: Lumbar intervertebral disc herniation (LIDH) is known to be a key cause of sciatica. Previously, we found that a significant limitation of neural displacement (66.6%) was evident with the SLR on the symptomatic side of patients with subacute single level posterolateral LIDH. Methods: Fourteen patients with significant sciatic symptoms due to a subacute single-level posterolateral LIDH were reassessed clinically and radiologically at 1.5 years follow-up with a 1.5T MRI scanner. Displacement of the conus medullaris during the unilateral and bilateral SLR was quantified reliably with a randomized procedure and compared between SLRs and to data from baseline. Multivariate regression models and backward variable selection method were employed to identify variables more strongly associated with a decrease in low back pain (LBP) and radicular symptoms. Results: Compared with previously presented baseline values, the data showed a significant increase in neural sliding in all the quantified maneuvers (P ≤ 0.01), and particularly of 2.52 mm (P ≤ 0.001) with the symptomatic SLR.Increase in neural sliding correlated significantly with decrease of both radicular symptoms (Pearson = -0.719, P ≤ 0.001) and LBP (Pearson = -0.693, P ≤ 0.001). Multivariate regression models and backward variable selection method confirmed the improvement of neural sliding effects (P ≤ 0.004) as the main variable being associated with improvement of self- reported clinical symptoms. Conclusion: To our knowledge, these are the first noninvasive data to objectively support the association between increase in magnitude of neural adaptive movement and resolution of both radicular and LBP symptoms in in vivo and structurally intact human subjects. Level of evidence: 2.

STUDY DESIGN This study is a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficacy of tubular microdiscectomy (TMD) compared with conventional microdiscectomy (CMD) for lumbar disc herniation (LDH). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA TMD has developed rapidly due to reduced tissue trauma by minimization of the required access to spine and disc herniation; however, CMD remains the standard of care for this patient group. To date, it remains debatable whether TMD is superior to CMD for LDH. METHODS We performed a comprehensive database search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trails for prospective randomized controlled trials (RCTs), through using Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms "microdiscectomy," "tubular microdiscectomy," "minimally invasive surgery," and "spinal disease." The retrieved results were last updated on March 15, 2018. Two independent investigators selected qualified studies, extracted indispensable data, assessed risk of bias of original papers. The Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to grade quality of evidence. If I >50, the heterogeneity is considerable. RESULTS Four RCT studies (total n = 605), involving 610 individuals with a follow-up period of no less than 12 months, were selected for further review. We assessed these studies as low overall risk of bias. There was low-quality evidence that TMD was superior to CMD considering postoperative Oswestry Disability Index scores (SMD, -3.43, 95% CI, -4.64 to -2.21, P

A single perioperative dose of glucocorticoid or gabapentinoid, or a combination of the 2, may improve postoperative analgesia, but data are still insufficient to be conclusive. In this single-center, randomized, double-blind, and double-dummy trial, we aimed to test whether the analgesic effect of adding preoperative pregabalin, at a dose unlikely to induce side effects, to preoperative dexamethasone improves early mobilization after spinal surgery.A total of 160 patients undergoing scheduled lumbar disk surgery (145 analyzed) comprised the study cohort. The patients received either 0.2 mg/kg intravenous dexamethasone before incision, or 150 mg oral pregabalin 1 hour before surgery, or a combination of the 2, or none of the above (control). Analgesia was supplemented by acetaminophen and ketoprofen, plus oxycodone ad libitum. The primary outcome was pain intensity during the first attempt to sit up, assessed the morning of the first postoperative day on an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale. Pain at rest and when standing up, opioid consumption, and tolerance were also assessed.None of the treatments tested differed from the control group in terms of efficacy or tolerance, even 6 months after surgery. The overall quality of analgesia was good, with only 10% and 30% of pain scores exceeding 3/10 for pain at rest and during movement, respectively.In this surgical model with the given anesthetic and analgesic environment, there was no advantage gained by adding low-dose pregabalin or dexamethasone. The multimodal analgesic protocol applied to all patients may have reduced the size of the effect.

STUDY DESIGN: This cohort study was an analysis of prospectively collected data in the DaneSpine Database.OBJECTIVE: The objective was to determine whether preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings were associated with the frequency of surgical revision due to recurrent lumbar disc herniation (LDH) within 3 years after first-time, single-level, simple lumbar discectomy.SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Because of a risk of poorer outcome in patients receiving revision surgery compared with first-time discectomy, there is a need to identify patients with LDH in risk of surgical revision prior to the primary discectomy. The association between preoperative MRI findings and revision surgery in patients with LDH has not been thoroughly studied.METHODS: Following an interobserver reliability study preoperative MRIs were evaluated. Potential predictive variables for surgical revision were evaluated using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis. Also, a sum-score of the number of MRI findings at the involved level was assessed.RESULTS: In a study population of 451 operated patients, those who had surgical revision were significantly younger and were significantly less likely to have vertebral endplate signal changes Type 2 (OR 0.36 (95% CI 0.15-0.88)) or more than five MRI findings (OR 0.45 (95% CI 0.21-0.95)) at the involved level than the patients not undergoing surgical revision. Surgical revision was not significantly associated with any other MRI findings.CONCLUSIONS: In general, preoperative MRI findings have a limited explanatory value in predicting surgical revision within 3 years after first-time, single-level, simple lumbar discectomy. Both the single variable VESC Type 2 and a sum-score > 5 MRI findings at the operated level were found to be negatively associated with patients undergoing surgical revision.LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

STUDY DESIGN A retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE To compare the cost of maximum nonoperative therapy (MNT) in patients diagnosed with a herniated lumbar disk undergoing primary (1-3 mo) versus prolonged (4-6 mo) conservative management before microdiscectomy. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Patients diagnosed with a herniated lumbar disk often attempt a 3-month trial of conservative management before microdiscectomy. A paucity of data exists characterizing the cost of a subsequent round of nonoperative therapies in patients who fail their initial trial, rather than undergo surgery. METHODS Clinical records from patients diagnosed with a herniated lumbar disk undergoing index microdiscectomy surgery from 2007 to 2017 were gathered from a large insurance database. Records were searchable by International Classification of Diseases diagnosis/procedure codes, Current Procedural Terminology codes, and generic drug codes. Two cohorts were established: patients undergoing primary (1-3 mo) versus prolonged (4-6 mo) courses of conservative management. Nonoperative therapy utilization was documented from initial herniation diagnosis to microdiscectomy surgery. "Utilization" encompassed cost billed to patients, prescriptions written, and quantity of units dispensed. RESULTS The 3-month MNT cohort included 4587 patients and the 6-month MNT cohort contained 1506 patients. A greater percentage of 6-month cohort patients utilized opioids (P=0.0052), muscle relaxants (P=0.0061), and lumbar steroid injections (P

The aim of this study was to determine the effect of low back pain on the daily activities and sleep quality of patients with lumbar disc herniation. This cross-sectional study was performed between January and July 2015 in 77 patients. A visual analog scale (VAS), the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index were used for patient assessment. The mean (SD) ODI score was 58.84 (9.51), and the mean (SD) VAS score of patients was 73.26 (24.37) mm. The VAS and ODI scores increased with age. This disability was mainly observed during weight lifting (67.6%), walking (48.1%), and standing (50.7%). A positive correlation was found between VAS score and ODI (r = 0.49, P < .001) and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (r = 0.23, P = .039) scores. In patients with lumbar disc herniation, disability in activities of daily living and sleep quality are directly affected by low back pain and increase with pain intensity. Findings of this study provide useful information for healthcare professionals.

The most popular approach to treating symptomatic cervical disk disease is anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Although this procedure has significant long-term clinical success, it is associated with progressive adjacent segment degeneration with an annual incidence of ∼3%. Total disk arthroplasty was designed as an alternative to fusion that could preserve segmental motion at the operative level and potentially delay or prevent adjacent-level breakdown. The etiology of adjacent segment pathology (ASP) is multifactorial, and it is likely that most cases of ASP are unavoidable. When attempting to surgically prevent ASP, it is important to consider nonfusion alternatives, be judicious in one's level selection, and attempt to restore sagittal alignment. When ASP becomes a clinical problem, it is important to have an algorithm for how best to treat it.

Retrospective review of prospective data.Determine whether patient reported outcome (PRO) data collected prior to lumbar discectomy predicts achievement of a minimal important difference (MID) after surgery. Compare ability of PRO and clinical information to predict achievement of MID in short term follow-up after discectomy.We investigated the ability of patient reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) and clinical factors at the preoperative time point to determine patients achieving MID after surgery.PROMIS physical function (PF), pain interference (PI), and depression (D) scores were assessed at evaluation and follow-up for consecutive visits between February, 2015 and September, 2017. Patients with preoperative scores within 30 days prior to surgery and with scores 40 days or more after surgery who completed all PROMIS domains were included yielding 78 patients. MIDs were calculated using a distribution-based method. A multivariate logistic regression model was created, and the ability to predict achieving MID for each of the PROMIS domains was assessed. Cut-off values and prognostic probabilities were determined for this model and models combining preoperative PROMIS with clinical data.Preoperative PROMIS scores modestly predict reaching MID after discectomy (areas under the curve [AUC] of 0.62, 0.68, and 0.76 for PF, PI, and D, respectively). Preoperative cut-off scores show patients who have PF and PI scores more than 2 standard deviations, and D more than 1.5 standard deviations worse-off than population mean are likely to achieve MID. The combination of PROMIS with clinical data was the most powerful predictor of reaching MID with AUCs of 0.87, 0.84, and 0.83 for PF, PI, and D.PROMIS scores before discectomy modestly predict improvement after surgery. Preoperative PROMIS combined with clinical factors was more predictive of achieving MID than either clinical factors or PROMIS alone.3.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the predictive value of T2 mapping at baseline with regard to the development of disk herniation and clinical outcome at a 5-year follow-up in patients with low back pain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-five symptomatic patients (13 male; mean age, 44.0 years; range, 24–64 years at baseline) were examined at 3 T magnetic resonance imaging, with a 5-year follow-up. Region of interest analysis was performed on 125 lumbar intervertebral disks on 2 central sagittal T2 maps. Absolute T2 relaxation times and a T2 value ratio of the posterior annulus fibrosus as a percentage of the nucleus pulposus (NPAF) were evaluated for each disk. All disks were graded morphologically using the Pfirrmann score. Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaires (RMDQ) and a visual analogue scale (VAS) were assessed for each patient at follow-up as a clinical end point and compared with diagnosed lumbar disk herniation. Statistical analysis was conducted by a biomedical statistician. RESULTS: Using the baseline NPAF ratio, follow-up development of herniation was predicted with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.893 in a receiver operating characteristic curve. The same was done using the baseline nucleus pulposus T2, resulting in an AUC of 0.901. Baseline and follow-up NPAF, as well as baseline and follow-up nucleus pulposus T2, differed significantly (P < 0.001) between disks with no herniation, disks with herniation at baseline, and disks with new herniation at follow-up. Difference was still significant (all P < 0.001), when only testing for difference in degenerated discs with Pfirrmann score III to V. Calculating sensitivity and specificity for herniation prediction only in discs with Pfirmann III to V using a receiver operating characteristic, AUC was 0.844 with baseline herniations excluded. The lowest baseline nucleus pulposus T2 per patient correlated significantly with follow-up RMDQ (r = −0.517; P = 0.008) and VAS (r = −0.494; P = 0.012). The highest baseline NPAF correlated significantly with RMDQ (r = 0.462; P = 0.020), but not VAS (r = 0.279; P = 0.177). CONCLUSIONS: Quantitative T2 mapping may serve as a clinically feasible, noninvasive imaging biomarker that can indicate disks at risk for herniation and correlates with clinical outcome and subjective patient burden in a representative cohort of patients with low back pain.

STUDY DESIGN In-vitro study of the tissue mechanics of annulus fibrosus. OBJECTIVE To determine the effect of axial torsion on the mechanical properties of the inter- and intralamellar matrices. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Axial torsion, when combined with repetitive flexion, has been associated with an increased risk of intervertebral disc herniation. However, the mechanisms behind this relationship are poorly understood. METHODS Bovine intervertebral discs (IVDs) from the caudal region were exposed to a combination of either 0° or 12° of static axial torsion and 0 N or 1000 N of compression for 2 hours in an attempt to created micro-damage to the IVD. Following the loading protocol, one multilayered sample and two single layer samples were dissected from the annulus fibrosus to undergo tensile testing of the inter- and intralamellar matrices. Histological staining was also performed. RESULTS The strength of the interlamellar matrix was not affected by axial torsion or compression, suggesting that torsion did not damage the interlamellar matrix. However, intralamellar matrix strength of samples exposed to axial torsion, regardless of compressive loading magnitude, was 48% lower than those from samples that were not exposed to torsion (P

Objective This report describes a novel posterior trench approach involving percutaneous endoscopic cervical discectomy (PECD) for central cervical intervertebral disc herniation (CIVDH) and an evaluation of the feasibility, safety, and short-term clinical effect of this approach. Background context Central CIVDH is considered the contraindication for posterior PECD. Materials and methods A single-center retrospective observational study was performed with 30 patients managed with posterior PECD using the trench approach for symptomatic single-level central CIVDH. Primary outcomes included the measures of bodily pain and physical function based on the SF-36 and modified MacNab criteria. Radiographical follow-up included the static and dynamic cervical plain radiographs, computed tomographic scans, and magnetic resonance images. Results A positive clinical response for symptom relief was achieved in all patients. The postoperative MRI showed total removal of the herniated disc. Conclusions As a supplement to the described surgical techniques of PECD, this trench approach provides novel access for the treatment of CIVDH, especially for the central type. The advantages of this technique include the provision of access to decompress the ventral region of the thecal sac and the ability to avoid damage to the facet joint. The steep learning curve might be a major disadvantage, and the sample volume is a limitation of the study; the effectiveness and reliability of the trench approach should be further verified in a comparative cohort study with a large volume of patients.

Introduction: Inadequate validation, floor/ceiling effects, and time constraints limit utilization of standardized patient-reported outcome measures. We aimed to validate Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) computer adaptive tests (CATs) for patients treated surgically for a lumbar disk herniation. Methods: PROMIS, CATs, Oswestry Disability Index, and Short Form-12 measures were administered to 78 patients treated with lumbar microdiskectomy for symptomatic disk herniation with radiculopathy. Results: PROMIS CATs demonstrated convergent validity with legacy measures; PROMIS scores were moderately to highly correlated with the Oswestry Disability Index and Short Form-12 physical component scores (r = 0.41 and 0.78, respectively). PROMIS CATs demonstrated similar responsiveness to change compared with legacy measures. On average, the PROMIS CATs were completed in 2.3 minutes compared with 5.7 minutes for legacy measures. Discussion: The PROMIS CATs demonstrate convergent and known groups' validity and are comparable in responsiveness to legacy measures. These results suggest similar utility and improved efficiency of PROMIS CATs compared with legacy measures. Levels of Evidence: Level II