Search

Biliary atresia (BA) is the leading indication to perform a pediatric liver transplantation (LT). Timely hepatoportoenterostomy (HPE) attempts to interrupt the natural history and allow for enteric bile flow; however, most patients who are treated with HPE require LT by the age of 10 years. We determined the cost-effectiveness of foregoing HPE to perform primary LT (pLT) in children with BA compared with standard-of-care HPE management. A Markov model was developed to simulate BA treatment over 10 years. Costs were measured in 2018 US dollars and effectiveness in life-years (LYs). The primary outcome was incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) between treatments. Model parameters were derived from the literature. In the base model, we assumed similar LT outcomes after HPE and pLT. Sensitivity analyses on all model parameters were performed, including a scenario in which pLT led to 100% patient and graft survival after LT. Children undergoing HPE accumulated $316,692 in costs and 8.17 LYs per patient. Children undergoing pLT accumulated $458,059 in costs and 8.24 LYs per patient, costing $1,869,164 per LY gained compared with HPE. With parameter variation over plausible ranges, only post-HPE and post-LT costs reduced the ICER below a typical threshold of $100,000 per LY gained. On probabilistic sensitivity analysis, 93% of iterations favored HPE at that threshold. With 100% patient and graft survival after pLT, pLT cost $283,478 per LY gained. HPE is more economically favorable than pLT for BA. pLT is unfavorable even with no graft or patient loss. The ability to predict those patients who may experience high costs after HPE or low costs after LT may help identify those patients for whom pLT could be considered.

Intestinal failure requires the placement and maintenance of a long-term central venous catheter for the provision of fluids and/or nutrients. Complications associated with this access contribute to significant morbidity and mortality, while the loss of access is an increasingly common reason for intestinal transplant referral. As more emphasis has been placed on the prevention of central line-associated bloodstream infections and new technologies have developed, care for central lines has improved; however, because care has evolved independently in local centers, care of central venous access varies significantly in this vulnerable population. The present position paper from the Intestinal Failure Special Interest Group of the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition (NASPGHAN) reviews current evidence and provides recommendations for central line management in children with intestinal failure.

Background Caregivers of children with intestinal failure (IF) face difficult decisions without a clear best alternative. Providers assist in decision-making but often lack knowledge of caregiver perspectives. Using decision-making around anemia treatment as a focal point, we explored how caregivers of children with IF prefer to make decisions. Our goal was to offer insight to guide providers as they assist in decision-making. Methods We conducted 12 half-hour semistructured interviews with parents of children with IF. Interview questions addressed general decision-making and specifics of iron supplementation, including key factors and stakeholders in decision-making. Interviews were transcribed verbatim. Two investigators coded the transcripts and inductively derived themes. Results Four themes were identified regarding decision-making. They involved the search for reliable, accurate, and positive information; the role of caretakers on the medical team; the relationships between caretakers and the medical team; and effective communication. Themes around anemia treatment included: identification of anemia by bloodwork; proactive supplementation; individualized regimens; prioritizing safety and convenience. Conclusions Understanding caregiver perspectives regarding anemia treatment in pediatric IF identifies opportunities for systematic quality improvement.