Search

Objective To examine the independent prognostic value of ALN status in patients with stage III CRC. Summary of background data Early CRC staging classified nodal involvement by level of involved nodes in the operative specimen, including both locoregional and apical node status, in contrast to the American Joint Committee on Cancer/tumor nodes metastasis (TNM) system where tumors are classified by the number of nodes involved. Whether ALN status has independent prognostic value remains controversial. Methods Consecutive patients who underwent curative resection for Stage III CRC from 1995 to 2012 at Concord Hospital, Sydney, Australia were studied. ALN status was classified as: (i) ALN absent, (ii) ALN present but not histologically involved, (iii) ALN present and involved. Outcomes were the competing risks incidence of CRC recurrence and CRC-specific death. Associations between these outcomes and ALN status were compared with TNM N status results. Results In 706 patients, 69 (9.8%) had an involved ALN, 398 (56.4%) had an uninvolved ALN and 239 (33.9%) had no ALN identified. ALN status was not associated with tumor recurrence [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 1.02, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.84-1.26] or CRC-specific death (HR 1.14, CI 0.91-1.43). However, associations persisted between TNM N-status and both recurrence (HR 1.58, CI 1.21-2.06) and CRC-specific death (HR 1.59, CI 1.19-2.12). Conclusions No further prognostic information was conferred by ALN status in patients with stage III CRC beyond that provided by TNM N status. ALN status is not considered to be a useful additional component in routine TNM staging of CRC.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to identify and categorize the independent prognostic effects of patient, clinical, operative, and pathology variables on long-term survival after anterior resection or abdominoperineal excision of the rectum for cancer. METHODS: Proportional hazards regression analysis was used to analyze prospective data from 709 patients who underwent surgery at Concord Hospital during a 23-year period. No patient received adjuvant therapy. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: After adjusting for age and clinicopathologic stage, significantly poorer survival was experienced by males, patients with extensive tumor adherent to other organ(s), those with a high-grade tumor or a tumor showing venous invasion, those who had a postoperative cardiovascular or respiratory complication, and those who did not undergo surgery by a colorectal surgeon specialist. The nature of the operation performed had no independent effect on survival.

This study, using prospective data, compares the survival of 1011 patients who had a colorectal cancer resected at Concord Hospital between 1971 and 1983. The results are expressed both in terms of Australian clinicopathologic (CP) staging and the modified pTNM method proposed by the American Joint Committee for Cancer Staging and End Results reporting. The aim of the study was to determine which of the two staging methods gave the better guide to prognosis. The results indicate that pTNM does not add to information beyond that given by CP staging. We conclude that the pTNM classification is only partially able to separate patients into different survival groups; it is complicated and difficult to memorize, and does not give useful prognostic information beyond that provided by the simpler CP system.