Search

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Inflammation promotes hyperalgesia and increases opioid binding protein (alpha1-acid glycoprotein) inducing increased opioid requirement. To investigate the influence of an acute episode of inflammatory bowel disease in opioid requirement during major abdominal surgery, 17 patients with Crohn's disease, 12 patients with ulcerative colitis and seven patients without any inflammatory process (control group) were prospectively studied. Sufentanil requirements were assessed during surgery. METHODS Sufentanil administration was adjusted when haemodynamic variables changed more than 20% of preoperative values. In a subgroup of 20 patients (Crohn's disease: 7, ulcerative colitis: 7, control group: 6), plasma concentrations of alpha1-acid glycoprotein and unbound sufentanil were measured. Total plasma clearance of sufentanil was also determined. Data presented as median (25-75 per thousand) were analysed by non-parametric and ANOVA tests. RESULTS Despite similar surgery duration, intraoperative sufentanil requirements were significantly larger in both the Crohn's disease group (0.9 (0.6-1.6) microg kg(-1) h(-1)) and the ulcerative colitis group (1.1 (0.6-1.7) microg kg(-1) h(-1)) than in the control group (0.5 (0.4-0.5) microg kg(-1) h(-1)). Total plasma clearance of sufentanil was larger in patients with inflammatory bowel disease than in the control group. The plasma alpha1-acid glycoprotein concentration was increased in the inflammatory bowel disease group. However, the free fraction of sufentanil was similar in all three groups. The largest sufentanil consumption in patients with inflammatory bowel disease was observed during time of pain stimulation in the area of referred hyperalgesia from the affected viscus. In the control group, the sufentanil requirement was constant throughout surgery. CONCLUSION Inflammatory bowel disease increases opioid requirement during major abdominal surgery.

UNLABELLED The extent to which epidurally administered sufentanil acts directly on spinal opioid receptors remains controversial. We tested the hypothesis that small-dose boluses of sufentanil, given epidurally or IV, provide comparable analgesia at similar plasma sufentanil concentrations. The lipophilicity of sufentanil makes it likely to be absorbed into fat surrounding the epidural space. We therefore also tested the hypothesis that more epidural than IV sufentanil is required to produce comparable analgesia. Analgesia and plasma sufentanil concentrations were evaluated in 20 postoperative patients randomly assigned to patient-controlled epidural or IV sufentanil. Pain was evaluated with visual analog scales by blinded observers. Sufentanil doses and plasma concentrations were measured. Analgesia was similar with epidural and IV sufentanil administration. Plasma sufentanil concentrations were virtually identical in the two groups. However, significantly larger sufentanil doses were required with epidural administration: 238 +/- 50 microg vs 160 +/- 32 microg (P < 0.01). The primary mechanism by which small-dose boluses of epidurally-administered sufentanil produce analgesia seems to be systemic absorption of the drug with subsequent recirculation to the supraspinal opioid receptors. This study demonstrates that the cumulative dose of sufentanil, when administered as a small epidural bolus, is approximately 50% more than that administered IV to provide comparable analgesia. This indicates that the bioavailability of epidurally-administered sufentanil is reduced and suggests that a large proportion of the drug may be absorbed into the epidural fat. IMPLICATIONS More epidural than IV sufentanil was required to provide comparable postoperative pain relief and similar plasma sufentanil concentrations. These data suggest that when sufentanil is administered in small-dose boluses, much of the drug is absorbed into the epidural fat and that the primary mechanism by which epidurally administered sufentanil produces analgesia is via systemic absorption.

Background Patients with essential hypertension show altered baroreflex control of heart rate, and during the perioperative period they demonstrate increased circulatory instability. Clonidine has been shown to reduce perioperative circulatory instability. This study documents changes in measures of heart rate control after surgery in patients with essential hypertension and determines the effects of clonidine on postoperative heart rate control in these patients. Methods Using a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled design, 20 patients with essential hypertension (systolic pressure >160 mm Hg or diastolic pressure >95 mm Hg for > or =1 yr) were assigned to receive clonidine (or placebo), 6 microg/kg orally 120 min before anesthesia and 3 microg/kg intravenously over 60 min before the end of surgery. The spontaneous baroreflex ("sequence") technique and analysis of heart rate variability were used to quantify control of heart rate at baseline, before induction of anesthesia, and 1 and 3 h postoperatively. Results Baroreflex slope and heart rate variability were reduced postoperatively in patients given placebo but not those given clonidine. Clonidine resulted in greater postoperative baroreflex slope and power at all frequency ranges compared with placebo (4.9+/-2.9 vs. 2.2+/-2.1 ms/mm Hg for baroreflex slope, 354+/-685 vs. 30+/-37 ms2/Hz for high frequency variability). Clonidine also resulted in lower concentrations of catecholamine, decreased mean heart rate and blood pressure, and decreased perioperative tachycardia and hypertension. Conclusions Patients with hypertension exhibit reduced heart rate control during the recovery period after elective surgery. Clonidine prevents this reduction in heart rate control. This may represent a basis for the improved circulatory stability seen with perioperative administration of clonidine.

Alfentanil and sufentanil are used in the anesthetic management of patients undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) and are extensively metabolized by the liver. We examined the influence of OLT on the removal of these opioids. 14 patients undergoing OLT were given either alfentanil (40 micrograms/kg intravenous [IV] bolus) or sufentanil (5 micrograms/kg IV bolus) during the induction of anesthesia, followed by infusion during surgery (1 microgram.kg-1.min-1 alfentanil or 0.01 microgram.kg-1.min-1 sufentanil) and the postoperative period (0.5 microgram.kg-1.min-1 or 0.005 microgram.kg-1.min-1). A catheter was inserted into the hepatic vein to determine the drugs' hepatic extraction coefficient and hepatic clearance. The hepatic extraction coefficient was 0.14 for alfentanil and 0.35 for sufentanil. The total and hepatic clearance of alfentanil were similar, while the hepatic clearance of sufentanil was 50% of the total clearance (P0.05). The total clearance of alfentanil was significantly linked to its hepatic clearance (r2 = 0.81, P0.001). We conclude that the total clearance of sufentanil is greater than its hepatic clearance. This difference suggests that there is extrahepatic metabolism of sufentanil in patients undergoing OLT.

The utility of clonidine for hypertensive patients presenting for major vascular procedures remains debatable. Twenty-one hypertensive patients presenting for aortic surgery were given clonidine (n = 11) or placebo (n = 10) in a double-blind, randomized manner. Clonidine was administered 6 micrograms/kg per os 120 min before induction of anesthesia and 3 micrograms/kg intravenously (i.v.) over 60 min from aortic declamping to skin closure. Anesthesia was induced with alfentanil 20 micrograms/kg, midazolam, and atracurium and maintained with nitrous oxide 70%, an alfentanil infusion (0.25 microgram.kg-1. min-1), and isoflurane. Anesthetic requirements, circulatory variables, interventions, and isoproterenol dose-response curves (pre- and postoperatively) were determined. Plasma concentrations of clonidine, alfentanil, and vasoactive hormones were measured. When the clonidine group was compared with the placebo group, (a) isoflurane, alfentanil, and midazolam requirements were reduced by 38%, 42%, and 41%, respectively (P = 0.04, 0.03, 0.0002, respectively); (b) supplemental circulatory and anesthetic adjustments were reduced by 51% (P = 0.0006); (c) interventions with vasopressors were not significantly increased (placebo: two; clonidine: five); (d) systolic and mean arterial pressures and heart rate were reduced; (e) increases in norepinephrine, epinephrine, and plasma renin activity were suppressed, whereas vasopressin surge was attenuated; and (f) chronotropic response to isoproterenol was unaffected. Clonidine was effective in reducing anesthetic requirements and in improving circulatory stability in hypertensive patients presenting for major vascular procedures.

Epidural clonidine produces postoperative analgesia in patients and potentiates opioid analgesia in animals. The aim of the current study was to assess the effect of epidural clonidine on the plasma concentrations and analgesic effect of fentanyl after epidural administration. Twenty ASA physical status 2 or 3 patients recovering from abdominal surgery were allocated randomly to receive either epidural fentanyl (100 micrograms in 10 ml isotonic saline; EF group) or epidural fentanyl (same dose) plus epidural clonidine (150 micrograms; EF + C group) in isotonic saline solution. Analgesia was assessed over a period of 12 h after epidural injection. Venous samples were obtained until 360 min after epidural injection for radioimmunoassay determination of plasma fentanyl concentration. Onset of analgesia was similar in the two groups of patients (13 +/- 6 and 13 +/- 3 min, respectively, after injection), but duration was more than doubled in the patients receiving clonidine (543 +/- 183 vs. 250 +/- 64 min). Peak plasma fentanyl concentrations (Fmax) and the time to reach Cmax (Tmax) were comparable in the two groups (0.29 +/- 0.15 ng.ml-1 at 16.2 +/- 14.8 min in the EF group and 0.27 +/- 0.11 ng.ml-1 at 8.3 +/- 5.5 min in the EF + C group), as were plasma concentrations at each definite time of measurement. Drowsiness and hypotension were noticed in the EF + C group. Thus, epidural clonidine appears to prolong epidural fentanyl analgesia without affecting its plasma concentration.

To examine the effect of an alpha-2 agonist, clonidine, on oxygen uptake and on the incidence of postoperative shivering, 28 patients presenting for major abdominal surgery were randomly assigned in a double-blind manner to one of two groups. Intraoperatively, 14 patients received 5 micrograms.kg-1 clonidine infused over 3 h (clonidine group), and 14 patients received placebo (placebo group). Oxygen uptake was measured continuously over the first 3 postoperative hours with a mass spectrometer system. Circulatory variables, esophageal temperature, and skin temperature were measured over the first 6 postoperative hours. Heart rate, mean arterial pressure, rate pressure product, and norepinephrine concentration were decreased in the clonidine group (P less than 2 x 10(-4)). There were no differences among groups in the incidence of shivering and in the rate of increase of esophageal temperature. By contrast, oxygen uptake was lower in the clonidine group (P = 4 x 10(-4)). This contrasting pattern may be secondary to a reduction in the intensity of mean muscular tremor in the clonidine group.

Unlabelled BACKGROUND. Meperidine (pethidine) reportedly treats postoperative shivering better than equianalgesic doses of other mu-receptor agonists. The authors' first goal was to develop a method to accurately determine postoperative shivering thresholds, and then to determine the extent to which meperidine and sufentanil inhibit postoperative shivering. Methods A computer-controlled infusion was started before operation in 30 patients, with target plasma concentrations of 0.15, 0.30, or 0.60 microg/ml meperidine or 0.1, 0.15, or 0.2 ng/ ml sufentanil targeted; patients were randomly assigned to each drug and concentration. The infusion was continued throughout surgery and recovery. Anesthesia was maintained with nitrous oxide and isoflurane. Core temperatures were approximately 34 degrees C by the end of surgery. The compensated core temperature at which visible shivering and a 20% decrease in steady-state oxygen consumption was recorded identified the shivering threshold. A blood sample for opioid concentration was obtained from each patient at this time. The ability of each opioid to reduce the shivering threshold was evaluated using linear regression. Results End-tidal isoflurane concentrations were Conclusions At a given dose, sufentanil inhibited shivering 2,800 times better than meperidine. However, the equianalgesic ratio of these drugs is approximately 4,900. That is, meperidine inhibited shivering better than would be expected based on the equianalgesic potency ratio. These data are thus consistent with clinical observations suggesting that meperidine indeed possesses special antishivering activity.

The ventilatory response to CO2 was measured to evaluate the degree of respiratory depression after epidural sufentanil. After cesarean section performed with bupivacaine epidural anesthesia, 14 patients received either 30 micrograms (n = 7) or 50 micrograms (n = 7) of epidural sufentanil. Respiratory measurements were made before and 15, 45, and 120 min after sufentanil injection. The presence and severity of sedation and other nonrespiratory side effects were evaluated throughout the study. Plasma sufentanil assays were performed on blood samples obtained at frequent intervals during the first 2 h. Although changes in resting ventilation did not occur, both sufentanil doses depressed the ventilatory response to CO2. After sufentanil 30 micrograms, the slope of the CO2 response curve decreased significantly at 45 and 120 min (control value, 2.33 +/- 0.3 L.min-1.mm Hg-1 [mean +/- SEM] vs 1.61 +/- 0.24 and 1.72 +/- 0.15, respectively, P less than 0.05). After sufentanil 50 micrograms, significant decreases occurred at 15 and 45 min (control value, 2.84 +/- 0.71 vs 1.81 +/- 0.48 and 1.48 +/- 0.31 L.min-1.mm Hg-1, respectively). The mean maximal decrease in the slope occurred at 45 min and was more pronounced after 50 micrograms (-42.3% +/- 7.4%) than after 30 micrograms (-27.4% +/- 9.9%). Analgesia was similar in both groups. Side effects, particularly sedation, were more severe with the 50-micrograms dose. We conclude that 30 micrograms of epidural sufentanil is preferable to the higher dose with regard to both respiratory and nonrespiratory side effects. Even with the lower dose, monitoring of ventilation is advisable for a minimum of 2 h.