Search

Standard esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) is costly and uses conscious sedation that cirrhotic patients may tolerate poorly. This study aimed to determine the feasibility and acceptance of unsedated esophagoscopy with an ultrathin battery-powered endoscope (BPE) in cirrhotic patients for diagnosing esophageal varices (EV).We first studied the prevalence of significant gastroduodenal pathology that could be missed if only esophagoscopy were performed in cirrhotic patients undergoing liver transplant evaluation. A prospective study was then done to evaluate a BPE in EV screening. Unsedated per-oral endoscopy was first done by a single endoscopist using a BPE, followed by EGD by a second endoscopist who was masked to the BPE result. A visual analog score was used to determine patient tolerance. Patients were asked about their preference for endoscopy in the future. A paired Student t test and the kappa statistic were used in the statistical analysis.In the retrospective study, 199 patients were reviewed; three patients (1.5%) had gastric ulcers, and two patients (1%) had duodenal ulcers. In the prospective study, 28 cirrhotic patients (16 women) were evaluated. EV were diagnosed in 14 patients with a BPE, and 13 were confirmed by standard EGD (sensitivity and negative predictive value 100%, specificity and positive predictive value 93%, kappa = 0.93). EV were graded as large in one and small in 13 patients with a BPE, but small varices diagnosed in one patient were not confirmed on EGD. Both procedures were well tolerated by all patients. Twenty-seven of 28 patients preferred unsedated endoscopy with a BPE over EGD.Unsedated endoscopy with a BPE is safe and well tolerated. The diagnostic accuracy of a BPE for diagnosing EV is the same as by EGD. Esophagoscopy with a BPE is a potential alternative to EGD for EV screening.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to report the clinical response observed in a U.S. veteran population with hepatitis C to combination therapy with Rebetron (interferon/ribavirin) outside of a controlled study environment. METHODS: Ninety-nine consecutive patients with hepatitis C who met the approved guidelines for treatment were offered treatment with Rebetron. Ninety-four patients initiated therapy. All patients received formal instruction on the use of the drug, as well as the side effects and were instructed to report any side effects. Follow-up was scheduled twice a month for the first month, then monthly unless adverse events were observed. RESULTS: Ninety-four of 99 patients initiated therapy. Thirty-two patients were lost to follow-up or did not tolerate therapy. Ethnic distribution comprised 56 whites, 42 African Americans, one Hispanic. Of the 56 whites who started therapy, 39 completed treatment. Sustained viral response (SVR) for all genotypes was observed in 10 of 39 (26%). In the African American patients, 22 of 42 (52%) completed therapy, but a SVR was noted in none. The only Hispanic patient did not respond to therapy. In the veteran population, favorable factors associated with achieving SVR included having genotype other than 1, absence of cirrhosis, and ethnicity. Factors contributing to the low response rates were difficulty in adhering to therapy as well as a predominance of genotype 1. CONCLUSIONS: Using an intention-to-treat analysis, only 10% of veterans achieved SVR. These findings highlight the need to develop a multidisciplinary team to address the complexity of treating the veteran patient with hepatitis C.

Goals To identify predictors of esophageal varices (EV) using available clinical, laboratory, and diagnostic imaging variables. Background Patients with cirrhosis frequently undergo screening endoscopy for varices so that prophylactic therapy and/or follow up can be planned. It is unclear how often patients should be screened endoscopically for varices, and there are few data on the relationship of varices to nonendoscopic variables. Study Charts were reviewed for 247 consecutive patients with cirrhosis who underwent screening esophagogastroduodenoscopy for varices. Results A total of 184 patients (68 women) were studied. Ninety-four patients (51%) had varices; of whom, 90 had only EV (small, n = 66; large, n = 24), 13 had EV and gastric varices, and 4 had isolated gastric varices. The distribution of EV according to the Child-Turcotte-Pugh class was as follows: A, 35%; B, 60%; and C, 69%, with roughly equal prevalence of large varices (29%, 24%, and 24%, respectively) in each class. Independent predictors of large varices were thrombocytopenia ( p = 0.02) and splenomegaly ( p = 0.04) seen using imaging. A platelet count of less than 68,000/mm 3 had the highest discriminative value for large EV with a sensitivity of 71% and a specificity of 73%. Splenomegaly had sensitivity and specificity of 75% and 58%, respectively. Using these two variables, we placed patients into one of four groups, with a risk for large varices ranging from 4% to 34%. Conclusions The prevalence of EV in cirrhosis increases with the severity of liver disease, as expected. Thrombocytopenia and splenomegaly are independent predictors of large EV in cirrhosis. Further prospective studies might result in a discriminating algorithm to predict which patients with cirrhosis would benefit from early or regular endoscopy to detect clinically significant varices.

Hepatic Splenosis Masquerading as Hepatocellular Carcinoma in a Chronic Hepatitis C Patient

OBJECTIVE: Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is a common but poorly understood liver disease. Our aim was to study a large group of patients referred for Hepatology consultation to further characterize this disorder, in particular its demographics and range of severity. We also sought to better understand its etiology and its relationship to the insulin resistance syndrome, known as the metabolic syndrome or syndrome X. METHODS: Retrospective review of 90 patients seen over a 4-yr period. RESULTS: Ninety patients aged 14–70 with NASH seen at the Liver Clinics at either the University of Tennessee or the Medical University of South Carolina. Eleven had complications of portal hypertension and seven of these had undergone or were awaiting transplantation. NASH was seen in nine families either in siblings or in subsequent generations. Diabetes or insulin resistance were present in almost all in this cohort of patients with NASH. Diabetes, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, and atherosclerotic disease, the components of syndrome X, were common in this population. CONCLUSION: NASH affects males and females equally, and presents over a wide age range. Despite its usually benign course, 28% of patients had cirrhosis and almost half of those had complications of portal hypertension, necessitating liver transplantation. Obesity was common in affected patients and cirrhosis was more common in the morbidly obese. Familial clustering was common, with 18% of patients having a similarly affected first degree relative. The clinical features that define syndrome X (diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and atherosclerotic disease) are common in affected patients. Studies of glucose tolerance demonstrated unsuspected diabetes in six, and insulin resistance (the hallmark of syndrome X) in 85% of those tested. We hypothesize that NASH is a disorder of genetic etiology and is the hepatic manifestation of syndrome X, the insulin resistance syndrome.

TO THE EDITOR: Sensorimotor demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy is a rare complication in liver transplant (LT) patients taking tacrolimus (1, 2). The following case illustrates that cyclosporin neurotoxicity may also present as sensorimotor demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy despite therapeutic blood levels, and masquerade as diabetic polyneuropathy.