Search

Background In vivo data on tenofovir (TFV), emtricitabine (FTC), and efavirenz (EFV) concentration decay after intake cessation are limited; determinations of "true" elimination half-lives (t½) have often been based on suboptimal sampling windows. Understanding these parameters is important in managing missed doses and planning HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). This study investigated the pharmacokinetics (PK) of plasma TFV/FTC, their intracellular (IC) anabolites, TFV-diphosphate (DP) and FTC-triphosphate (TP), and plasma EFV over 10 days after intake cessation in HIV-negative volunteers. Methods Volunteers received an Atripla (TFV/FTV/EFV) tablet daily for 14 days. PK sampling occurred before final dose and up to 228 hours after stopping. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells for [IC](drug) and [plasma](drug) were isolated, with analysis by tandem mass spectrometry. Results Sixteen participants completed the study. Geometric mean plasma (t½)(228h) of TFV and FTC were 31 and 37 hours. These were longer than the previous reports (TFV 12-18 hours, FTC 10 hours).Geometric mean (t½)(228h) of IC TFV-DP and FTC-TP were 164 and 39 hours, whereas for EFV in plasma was 92 hours. [EFV](plasma) in 5/16 participants were below the suggested MEC of 1000 ng/mL within 48 hours postdose; however, 50% of the participants maintained concentrations above this level after 84 hours. Conclusions These data fully characterize the PK of TFV and TFV-DP, FTC and FTC-TP, and EFV after stopping the drug combination. Although decay in concentrations can be related to a target for EFV, this is more difficult for the IC phosphates. Consensus on 'target' triphosphate/diphosphate concentrations will further our understanding of missed/delayed doses in treatment and prevention strategies.

Objectives: Despite evidence for the role of adipokines such as adiponectin in the metabolic toxicities of protease inhibitor (PI)-treated patients, little is known about their role in nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI)-induced lipoatrophy (LA). We analyzed the relations between mitochondrial toxicity, adipokine expression, and clinical LA in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and adipose samples from individuals treated with stavudine (d4T) or zidovudine (ZDV) in comparison to patients undergoing highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) as well as HIV-negative individuals. Methods: In this cross-sectional analysis, we studied 18 PI-naive HIV-infected patients with LA treated with d4T (d4T + LA + [n = 12]) or zidovudine (ZDV + LA + [n = 6]) in comparison to HAART-treated patients with (HAART + LA + [n = 8]) and without (HAART + LA - [n = 8]) LA as well as HIV-negative controls (n = 12). Adipose samples were assessed for protein and/or messenger RNA (mRNA) levels of adiponectin, tumor necrosis factor-a (TNFa), interleukin (IL)-6, and sterol regulatory element-binding protein (SREBP) 1a/c in all groups, whereas adipose and PBMC samples from the d4T + LA + , ZDV + LA + , and HIV-negative subgroups were assessed for mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) depletion and cytochrome c-oxidase (COX) II/COX IV ratios. Results: There was no change in mtDNA levels in adipose or PBMC samples in NRTI-treated patients with LA, although patients treated with d4T had reduced COX II/COX IV ratios in adipose and PBMC samples. Adipose tissue adiponectin mRNA and plasma levels were reduced in the d4T- and ZDV-treated patients regardless of the use of PIs. Tissue SREBP 1 mRNA levels were also significantly reduced in both NRTI groups when compared with the HIV-negative controls. Significant reductions in SREBP1c levels were also evident with the HAART + LA + group when compared with HAART + LA - controls. Conclusions: Patients with LA on d4T-based regimens show evidence of mitochondrial respiratory chain dysfunction, whereas the d4T- and ZDV-based regimens also demonstrated reduced SREBP 1 c and adiponectin levels, findings that have previously been shown with PIs.

Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (tenofovir DF), the first nucleotide analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitor approved for the treatment of HIV infection, has been associated with renal dysfunction in isolated cases. We investigated the overall incidence and risk of renal dysfunction in individuals receiving tenofovir DF and compared this with other antiretrovirals.Data from the Chelsea and Westminster cohort were analyzed to reveal HIV-positive individuals with a creatinine value greater than 120 micromol/L at any time, the upper limit of normal used by our reference laboratory. These individuals were classified according to antiretroviral exposure and time exposed. A matched case-control study was performed comparing patients who had received tenofovir DF and subsequently developed a creatinine value greater than 120 micromol/L against controls who had been treated with tenofovir DF and had not experienced a creatinine elevation.Of 4183 HIV-positive patients, 1175 were identified as having a recorded creatinine value120 micromol/L. Comparison of antiretroviral-naive patients and patients exposed to tenofovir DF- and non-tenofovir DF-containing regimens revealed a lower rate ratio and probability of developing a creatinine value120 micromol/L in patients exposed to tenofovir DF (rate ratio vs. no antiretrovirals = 0.22, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.07-0.69; P0.001) with no significant difference between HAART regimens, corrected for duration of exposure. Of the 1058 individuals who were exposed to tenofovir DF, 84 (8%) patients experienced a creatinine value120 micromol/L subsequent to exposure. An alternative etiology of renal dysfunction was found in 75 (90%) of these individuals.Tenofovir DF is not associated with renal dysfunction more frequently than other antiretroviral drugs, and the occurrence of renal dysfunction in this context is usually attributable to other causes.

Background In vitro synergy and complementary resistance profiles provide a strong rationale for combining fosamprenavir with saquinavir as part of a potent double-boosted protease inhibitor regimen. This study evaluated the steady-state pharmacokinetics of saquinavir 1000 mg twice daily (bid) and fosamprenavir 700 mg bid administered with 2 different doses of ritonavir (100 and 200 mg bid) in HIV-1-infected subjects. Methods On day 1, 12-hour pharmacokinetic profiles for saquinavir/ritonavir (1000/100 mg bid) were obtained for 18 subjects. All subjects were receiving ongoing treatment with a saquinavir/ritonavir-containing regimen. Fosamprenavir 700 mg bid was then added to the regimen, and pharmacokinetic sampling was repeated for all 3 agents at day 11. The ritonavir daily dose was then increased to 200 mg bid, and a 3rd pharmacokinetic profile was obtained at day 22. Results The coadministration of fosamprenavir 700 mg bid with saquinavir/ritonavir 1000/100 mg bid resulted in a statistically nonsignificant decrease in saquinavir concentrations (by 14, 9, and 24%, for saquinavir area under the concentration-time curve [AUC]0-12, C(max), and C(trough), respectively). This was compensated for by an increased ritonavir dose of 200 mg bid, which resulted in a statistically nonsignificant increase in saquinavir exposure compared with baseline. Amprenavir levels did not appear to be significantly influenced by coadministration of saquinavir with fosamprenavir. Fosamprenavir significantly reduced ritonavir exposure, but the increased ritonavir dose compensated for this interaction. Conclusions Our findings showed that saquinavir/ritonavir/fosamprenavir was well tolerated over the study period. Saquinavir plasma concentrations were slightly lowered by the addition of fosamprenavir to the regimen. However, the addition of a further 100 mg ritonavir bid restored the small and insignificant decrease.

Objective: To determine the pharmacokinetics of saquinavir hard-gel capsules/ ritonavir/atazanavir co-administered once daily at 1600/100/300 mg in HIV-infected individuals. Methods: Eighteen patients receiving saquinavir/ritonavir switched to 1600/100 mg once daily a minimum of 3 days before the study. On study day 1, levels of saquinavir and ritonavir were determined over 24 h. Atazanavir (300 mg once daily) was then added to the regimen. On day 11, a pharmacokinetic analysis was performed. Atazanavir was discontinued on day 32. Drug concentrations were measured by highpressure liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Geometric mean ratios (GMR) and 95% confidence intervals (Cl) were used to compare saquinavir and ritonavir pharmacokinetic parameters, with and without atazanavir. A safety analysis was performed at screening, days 1, 11, 32 and follow-up. Results: After the addition of atazanavir, statistically significant increases in saquinavir trough plasma concentration (C trough GMR, 95% Cl 2.12, 1.72-3.50), maximum plasma concentration (C max 1.42, 1.24-1.94), area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0-24 h (AUC 0-24 1.60, 1.35-2.43) and ritonavir C max (1.58, 1.32-2.08), AUC 0-24 (1.41, 1.22-1.74) were observed. The pharmacokinetics of atazanavir compared with those obtained in patients receiving atazanavir/ritonavir without saquinavir. Four patients developed scleral icterus and two jaundice. Total and unconjugated bilirubin increased approximately fivefold during atazanavir therapy. Conclusion: The addition of atazanavir to saquinavir/ritonavir increased saquinavir C trough , C max and AUC 0-24 by 112, 42 and 60%. Ritonavir C max and AUC 0-24 increased by 34 and 41%. The regimen was well tolerated, with no significant change in laboratory parameters, except for the occurrence of hyperbilirubinemia.

The introduction of enfuvirtide (FUZEON) represents an important advance in the treatment of therapy-experienced patients with HIV-1 infection. However, parenteral self-administration, and the advanced disease and antiretroviral experience of patients currently most needing enfuvirtide introduce unique usage considerations. Enfuvirtide has been shown to provide clinically relevant improvements in CD4 cell counts and reductions in HIV viraemia across all subgroups of treatment-experienced patients studied, including those taking few or no other active drugs. However, optimal outcome results from initiation when the CD4 cell count is above 100 x 10(6) cells/l and viraemia below 1 x 10(5) copies/ml, as part of a newly constructed third or fourth antiretroviral regimen in combination with one or two other antiretrovirals to which the virus remains sensitive. Resistance testing should be used where available to guide background drug selection. Where insufficient options for an effective background exist, enfuvirtide should still be considered and treatment undertaken with the aim of achieving an immunological or clinical response, despite the unlikelihood of a sustained virological outcome. Similarly, where there is no viable alternative treatment, enfuvirtide should be continued following virological failure wherever ongoing immunological or clinical benefit is discerned. Injection site reactions (ISRs) are common on enfuvirtide and will affect almost all patients. ISRs are manageable and seldom activity- or treatment-limiting. Bacterial pneumonia and systemic hypersensitivity reactions have also been reported uncommonly. A structured series of patient visits with a healthcare professional provides an atmosphere of ongoing training and support that may prevent 'injection fatigue', maintain adherence and minimise the incidence of ISRs. An initial investment in establishing such procedures can be expected to yield significant returns in patient confidence and benefit on enfuvirtide.

HIV-associated wasting is defined as > or = 10% involuntary weight loss and includes declines in both lean and fat mass. This large (757 subjects), randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial investigated the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) in 2 doses-0.1 mg/kg up to a maximum of 6 mg daily (DD) or alternate days (AD)-in the treatment of wasting and weight loss in highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART)-treated HIV-infected subjects. The evaluable population for ergometry comprised 555 subjects, 87.6% of whom were receiving HAART. At 12 weeks, median maximum work output increased by 2.4 and 2.6 kJ in the AD and DD groups, respectively. The median treatment difference was 2.9 kJ for DD vs. placebo (P < 0.0001). Body weight increased by 2.2 and 2.9 kg in the AD and DD groups, respectively. Corresponding median treatment differences vs. placebo were 1.5 and 2.2 kg (P < 0.0001). Lean body mass (LBM), by bioelectric impedance spectroscopy, increased by 3.3 and 5.2 kg, respectively (P < 0.0001 vs. placebo; P = 0.0173 DD vs. AD), and fat mass, predominately truncal, decreased. Quality of life (QoL) improved significantly in both rhGH groups. Fluid-retention adverse effects and hyperglycemia were more common in the DD than in the AD group. No significant changes in HIV viral load or CD4 cell count occurred. In conclusion, over the 12-week course of therapy, rhGH, 0.1 mg/kg DD, was superior to placebo in improving physical function, body weight, body composition, and QoL and was superior to AD dosing in restoring LBM.

Context: The effectiveness of different protease inhibitors (PIs) and non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors outside the setting of clinical trials has not been well described. Objectives: To compare five different PI- and nevirapine (NVP)-containing regimens on virologic, immunologic, and clinical outcomes and treatment discontinuation. Design and Setting: Observational cohort study based on an HIV clinic in London. Patients: A total of 690 patients who received either saquinavir hard gel (SQV HG) (n = 183), indinavir (IDV) (n = 189), nelfinavir (NFV) (n = 109), ritonavir (RTV) (n = 42), ritonavir with saquinavir hard gel (RTV/SQV HG) (n = 45), or NVP (n = 122) as part of an initial PI- or NVP-containing treatment regimen between November 1994 and December 1998. A total of 351 (51%) patients had prior exposure to nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs). Main Outcome Measures: The main outcome measures were virologic undetectability, subsequent virologic rebound, CD4 cell count rise, development of AIDS, and treatment discontinuation. All analyses were stratified for year of initiation of the PIor NVP-containing regimen. Results: Overall, 63% of patients attained an undetectable viral load (VL) within 6 months of starting their PI or NVP regimen. The adjusted relative hazard (95% confidence interval [CI]) for an undetectable VL relative to SQV HG was (in rank order): 2.77 (CI: 1.84-4.17) for NFV, 2.54 (CI: 1.81-3.57) for IDV, 2.43 (CI: 1.52-3.87) for RTV, 2.08 (CI: 1.28-3.37) for RTV/SQV HG, and 1.96 (CI: 1.35-2.85) for NVP. Forty-nine percent of patients experienced VL rebound within 12 months of initial attainment of undetectability, but relative to SQV HG, this did not differ significantly across the different PI and NVP regimens. The CD4 cell count response and rate of AIDS events were also similar across the different regimens. No independent predictors of VL undetectability were identified, but prior NRTI exposure was associated with VL rebound, and a lower baseline VL and CD4 cell count were associated with a reduced CD4 count response. The frequency (95% CI) of treatment discontinuation differed across the regimens; at 6 months, it was lowest for NFV (18% [CI: 13%-24%]), IDV (25% [CI: 22%-29%]), and NVP (28% [CI: 22%-34%]) and highest for RTV (41% [CI: 31%-52%]) and SQV HG (52% [CI: 48%-57%]). Conclusions: Although PI- and NVP-containing regimens were similar in their CD4 cell count response and rates of subsequent VL rebound, differences were observed in time to VL undetectability and discontinuation rates relative to SQV HG. SQV HG was consistently inferior to the other PIs and NVP. The use of NFV and IDV was associated with the highest rates of undetectability, and together with NVP, the lowest rates of discontinuation.

OBJECTIVES To compare the efficacy and safety of saquinavir soft gelatin capsules (SQV-SGC) and nelfinavir (NFV), with or without two concomitant nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs), in an exploratory objective to identify populations most likely to benefit from quadruple therapy. DESIGN Phase II/III, open-label, randomized, parallel-arm, multicenter trial. PARTICIPANTS Enrollment included 157 protease inhibitor-naive adults (> or = 13 years) with HIV-1 RNA > or = 10,000 copies/ml; 132 participants completed 48 weeks of therapy. INTERVENTIONS SQV-SGC 1200 mg, NFV 750 mg, SQV-SGC 800 mg plus NFV 750 mg, all with two NRTIs, and SQV-SGC 800 mg plus NFV 750 mg alone, all three times daily for 48 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Proportion of participants with HIV-1 RNA

Background This double-blind study evaluated treatment with zalcitabine-zidovudine, saquinavir-zidovudine, or saquinavir-zalcitabine-zidovudine on the health-related quality of life of HIV-infected adults with CD4 cell counts between 50 and 350 cells/mm3. Methods Nine hundred and ninety-three HIV-infected male or female quality of life substudy patients aged 18 years or older, with CD4 cell counts between 50 and 350 cells/mm3 naive to antiretroviral therapy or with less than 16 weeks of zidovudine therapy, were randomly assigned to one of three daily regimens: zalcitabine 0.75 mg and zidovudine 200 mg every 8 h (ddC/ZDV); saquinavir 600 mg and zidovudine 200 mg every 8 h (SQV/ZDV); or saquinavir 600 mg, zalcitabine 0.75 mg and zidovudine 200 mg every 8 h (SQV/ddC/ZDV). The health-related quality of life was measured using the Medical Outcome Study HIV (MOS-HIV) Health Survey subscale and physical and mental health summary scores, and a global visual analogue scale (VAS) score. The primary health-related quality of life endpoints were the MOS-HIV physical and mental health summary scores. Results After 24 weeks of treatment, no statistically significant differences were observed between the three treatment groups on physical health and mental health summary scores (global test P = 0.118). After 48 weeks of treatment, statistically significant differences among the groups were observed for physical health and mental health summary scores (global test P = 0.020); no change in physical health summary scores from the baseline were seen in the triple combination therapy, whereas the ddC/ZDV combination therapy group showed decreases from baseline in physical health summary scores (P = 0.008). Six of the 10 individual MOS-HIV subscale scores and the VAS scores showed results consistent with the physical health summary endpoints after 48 weeks of therapy. No statistically significant differences in baseline to 48 week changes in MOS-HIV subscale or summary scores were seen between the ddC/ZDV and SQV/ZDV groups (P > 0.05). Conclusions Patients on triple combination therapy maintained their quality of life over 48 weeks compared with significant decreases in the quality of life for ddC/ZDV combination therapy.

Background: The treatment of HIV infection during pregnancy significantly and substantially reduces the risk of mother-to-child transmission. Although triple therapy is the standard of care for management of HIV infection in adults, the safety of many approved antiretroviral agents in pregnancy is not currently established. Methodology: An open-label pilot study conducted in Thailand and the UK of the safety of saquinavir soft-gel capsules 1200 mg three times daily administered in the second and third trimester of pregnancy in combination with local standard-of-care antiretroviral therapy. Infants received local standard-of-care antiretroviral therapy after delivery. Steady-state pharmacokinetics were performed in a subset of mothers at 4 weeks after the commencement of saquinavir therapy and paired samples collected from the mother and infant cord blood at delivery. Results: Eighteen antiretroviral-naive pregnant women with a mean viral load of 4.2 log 10 and CD4 cell count of 481/mm 3 were recruited. All patients received zidovudine and 3 (all in the UK) received lamivudine. There were no serious adverse events and no discontinuations due to adverse events. Viral load declined by 1.6 log 10 at week 4 and was less than 400 copies/mL at delivery in 16/17 mothers. Sixteen live births were recorded, with two in utero deaths-one secondary to an accident and the second due to antiphospholipid syndrome. Both deaths were considered by investigators to be unrelated to study therapy. All infants were HIV negative at subsequent follow-up and no fetal abnormalities were observed. Pharmacokinetic data suggested that mothers had relatively low exposures to saquinavir despite an excellent virologic response. Saquinavir was not detected in cord blood. Discussion: Saquinavir soft-gel capsules are well tolerated during pregnancy and are not associated in this small study with birth abnormalities. Transmission of HIV infection from mother to child was successfully prevented in all cases. Low maternal exposures of saquinavir were noted. However, these did not appear to affect virologic efficacy of the combination. Samples from cord blood indicate minimal fetal exposure to saquinavir.