1. Patterns of Self-Management in Pediatric Type 1 Diabetes Predict Level of Glycemic Control 2 Years Later
- Author
-
Grafton Reeves, Alan M. Delamater, Jennifer Shroff Pendley, Lawrence M. Dolan, Jennifer M. Rohan, and Dennis Drotar
- Subjects
Type 1 diabetes ,Pediatrics ,medicine.medical_specialty ,business.industry ,Clinical study design ,Dietary management ,Blood sugar ,medicine.disease ,Psychiatry and Mental health ,Diabetes mellitus ,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health ,Developmental and Educational Psychology ,medicine ,Clinical significance ,Prospective cohort study ,business ,Glycemic - Abstract
Managing the various treatment regimens for pediatric type 1 diabetes can be very difficult for many youth and their families, particularly during the transition from childhood to adolescence when self-management and glycemic control typically decline [1–6]. Self-management for type 1 diabetes is multifaceted and involves multiple domains of care, including but not limited to, complex insulin adjustments, dietary management, and treatment adherence (i.e., frequent blood sugar monitoring). Individual variation in an adolescents’ pattern of self-management may predict clinically relevant outcomes, especially glycemic control [7]. Consequently, measurement of individual differences in patterns of self-management can help to target specific areas to improve glycemic control and reduce future health complications [8–10]. Previous studies have shown that maladaptive patterns of diabetes self-management at a single point in time were associated with less adequate glycemic control among adolescents during the same time period [11, 12]. A number of previous research studies have been limited by the following methodological problems: 1) cross-sectional study designs, which did not allow prediction of glycemic control; 2) absence of a comprehensive assessment of family reporters (e.g., youth, maternal, and paternal) that provided reports of the adolescents’ self-management patterns; and, 3) no assessment of clinical relevance of glycemic control (e.g., whether glycemic control was within recommended clinical targets). To address these needs, this study examined if three distinct self-management patterns (i.e., maladaptive, moderate/mixed, and adaptive) identified in a pediatric sample of early adolescents with type 1 diabetes (see Rohan et al. [12]) predicted glycemic control six, 12, 18, and 24 months later. Sustaining adequate glycemic control over time is the primary goal of clinical management in pediatric type 1 diabetes [13]. However, many adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes have difficulty maintaining levels of glycemic control that are within the American Diabetes Association (ADA) recommendations [13] for children and adolescents (i.e., Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) < 8% ages 6–12 years and < 7.5% ages 13–19 years) [1, 10]. There is substantial evidence that diabetes self-management patterns influences glycemic control: those with poor diabetes self-management skills across one or more domains of diabetes care often have worse glycemic control compared to those with higher, more adaptive self-management patterns who follow healthcare provider recommendations for exercise, diet, blood sugar testing and management, and insulin administration [5, 7, 11, 12, 14]. Thus, we hypothesized that across reporters the baseline maladaptive self-management group [12] would have worse glycemic control across time compared to the baseline moderate/mixed and adaptive self-management groups [12]. We also hypothesized that those in the maladaptive and moderate/mixed self-management groups at baseline, would have clinically significant HbA1c values that were above the age-based ADA recommendations six to 24 months later [12]. A second contribution of our study was to document stability and change in clusters of self-management and prediction of glycemic control over time. This is important because the efficacy of self-management and glycemic control have been shown to decline among adolescents with type 1 diabetes [1–6] but prospective studies have not described stability and change in patterns of self-management over time. To address this issue, we examined if: 1) the self-management patterns (all reporters) that were observed at baseline (see Rohan et al. [12]) were consistent with those self-management patterns observed at one and two years and then examined how these changes in self-management patterns predicted glycemic control at later points in time; 2) whether early adolescents’ self-management patterns remained stable over time or became more/less adaptive; and, 3) if self-management patterns observed at one and two years post-baseline predicted mean differences in subsequent HbA1c over time. We hypothesized that: 1) there would be three distinct self-management groups at one and two years post-baseline (i.e., maladaptive, moderate/mixed, and adaptive) that were similar to those obtained at baseline; and, 2) based on the above rationale that those with maladaptive self-management patterns at one and two years post-baseline would have worse glycemic control over time.
- Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF