Search

This study assessed the effect of the time interval from initial injury to surgery and the presence of associated fracture on functional outcomes after acute posterior elbow fracture dislocation. Twenty-six pediatric patients were evaluated with respect to operation time point (within 24 h vs. later) and associated fracture retrospectively. The Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI) score was used to assess functional results. The MEPI score was 91 (80-100) in patients with one associated fracture and 83 (75-95) (P=0.02) in patients with more than one associated fracture. The MEPI score in patients treated within 24 h was 90.3 (75-95) and in those treated later than 24 h, it was 88.6 (75-100) (P=0.6). Treatment time (within 24 h vs. later) does not affect outcomes, but increasing numbers of associated injuries affect outcomes negatively. Level of study: Level IV case series.

Infection after open fractures is a common complication. Treatment options for infections developed after intramedullary nailing surgery remain a topic of controversy. We therefore used a rat fracture model to evaluate the effects of infection on osseous union when the implant was maintained.In a rat model, (1) does infection alter callus strength; (2) does infection alter the radiographic appearance of callus; and (3) does infection alter the histological properties of callus?An open femoral fracture was created and fixed with an intramedullary Kirschner wire in 72 adult male Sprague-Dawley rats, which were divided into two study groups. In the infection group, the fracture site was contaminated with Staphylococcus aureus (36 animals), whereas in the control group, there was no bacterial contamination (36 animals). No antibiotics were used either for prophylaxis or for treatment. We performed biomechanical (maximum torque causing failure and stiffness), radiographic (Lane and Sandhu scoring for callus formation), and histologic (scoring for callus maturity) assessments at 3 and 6 weeks. The number of bacteria colonies on the femur, wire, and soft tissue inside knee were compared to validate that we successfully created an infection model. The number of bacteria colonies in the soft tissue inside the knee was higher in the infection group after 6 weeks than after the third week, demonstrating the presence of locally aggressive infection.Infection decreased callus strength at 6 weeks. Torque to failure (299.07 ± 65.53 Nmm versus 107.20 ± 88.81, mean difference with 95% confidence interval, 192 [43-340]; p = 0.007) and stiffness at 6 weeks (11.28 ± 2.67 Nmm versus 2.03 ± 1.68, mean difference with 95% confidence interval, 9 [3-16]; p = 0.004) both were greater in the control group than in the group with infection. Radiographic analysis at 6 weeks demonstrated the fracture line was less distinct (Lane and Sandhu score of 2-3) in the infection group and complete union was observed (Lane and Sandhu score of 3-4) in the control group (p = 0.001). Semiquantitative histology scores were not different between the noninfected controls and the rats with infection (score 10 versus 9).Retaining an implant in the presence of an underlying infection without antibiotic treatment leads to weaker callus and impedes callus maturation compared with noninfected controls in a rat model. Future studies might evaluate whether antibiotic treatment would modify this result.This model sets the stage for further investigations that might study the influence of different interventions on fracture healing in implant-associated osteomyelitis. Future observational studies might also evaluate the histological properties of callus in patients with osteomyelitis.

Objectives: To compare 3 different fixation methods for the treatment of humeral shaft nonunions in terms of union time, functional outcome, and complications. Design: Retrospective case series. Setting: University hospital. Patients: Between 1996 and 2004, 80 patients (mean age, 49; range, 15 to 86; 30 women and 50 men) with nonunions of the humeral shaft were treated surgically in our institution. Circular external fixators (CEF) were used in 35 patients, unilateral limb reconstruction system (LRS) fixators in 24 patients and fixation with plates in 21 patients. Intervention: Surgical procedure included hardware removal in previously operated patients, autogenous grafting in all patients in the plate group and in those patients with atrophic nonunions in the external fixator groups, compression of the nonunion site in all patients. Main Outcome Measurements: Radiological union time, complications, shortening, and disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) score. Results: Mean follow-up period was 48.1 months (range, 12 to 121). Mean radiological union time was 5.5 months (range, 1.5 to 12) in the CEF group, 5.2 months (range, 3 to 10) in the LRS group, and 5.7 months (range, 3 to 12) in the plate group. Mean DASH score was 23.7 in the CEF group, 18.6 in the LRS group, and 26 in the plate group. There were no statistical differences in terms of union time and the DASH score among the 3 groups. Successful union was achieved in 77 (96.3%) patients. Conclusion: Both external fixation and plate fixation produce excellent results in humeral shaft nonunions if applied properly. The procedure can be tailored to the surgeon's experience, keeping in mind that plate fixation demonstrates a longer healing time in those cases that had previous surgeries.