Search

ObjectiveTo define the clinical phenotype of dermatomyositis (DM) with anti-Mi2 autoantibodies.MethodsIn this longitudinal cohort study, the prevalence and severity of clinical features at disease onset and during follow-up in patients with anti-Mi2–positive DM were compared to patients with anti-Mi2–negative DM, antisynthetase syndrome (AS), and immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy (IMNM). Longitudinal anti-Mi2 autoantibody titers were assessed.ResultsA total of 58 patients with anti-Mi2–positive DM, 143 patients with anti-Mi2–negative DM, 162 patients with AS, and 170 patients with IMNM were included. Among patients with anti-Mi2–positive DM, muscle weakness was present in 60% at disease onset and occurred in 98% during longitudinal follow-up; fewer patients with anti-Mi2–negative DM developed weakness (85%; p = 0.008). Patients with anti-Mi2–positive DM were weaker and had higher creatine kinase (CK) levels than patients with anti-Mi2–negative DM or patients with AS. Muscle biopsies from patients with anti-Mi2–positive DM had prominent necrosis. Anti-Mi2 autoantibody levels correlated with CK levels and strength (p < 0.001). With treatment, most patients with anti-Mi2–positive DM had improved strength and CK levels; among 10 with multiple serum samples collected over 4 or more years, anti-Mi2 autoantibody titers declined in all and normalized in 3, 2 of whom stopped immunosuppressant treatment and never relapsed. Patients with anti-Mi2–positive DM had less calcinosis (9% vs 28%; p = 0.003), interstitial lung disease (5% vs 16%; p = 0.04), and fever (7% vs 21%; p = 0.02) than did patients with anti-Mi2–negative DM.ConclusionsPatients with anti-Mi2–positive DM have more severe muscle disease than patients with anti-Mi2–negative DM or patients with AS. Anti-Mi2 autoantibody levels correlate with disease severity and may normalize in patients who enter remission.

Background: TCH346 exerts antiapoptotic effects by binding to glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) and blocking the apoptotic pathway in which GAPDH is involved. Apoptosis is considered to be a key pathogenic mechanism in neurodegenerative diseases including ALS. Methods: Patients were randomly assigned in a double-blind fashion to receive either placebo or one of four doses of TCH346 (1.0, 2.5, 7.5, or 15 mg/day) administered orally once daily for at least 24 weeks. The primary outcome measure was the rate of change in the revised ALS functional rating scale (ALSFRS-R). The trial design included a 16-week lead-in phase to determine each patient9s rate of disease progression. The between treatment comparison was adjusted for the individual pretreatment rates of progression. The study was powered to detect a 25% reduction in the rate of decline of the ALSFRS-R as compared with placebo. Secondary outcome measures included survival, pulmonary function, and manual muscle testing (MMT). Results: Five hundred ninety-one patients were enrolled at 42 sites in Europe and North America. There were no differences in baseline variables. There were no significant differences between placebo and active treatment groups in the mean rate of decline of the ALSFRS-R or in the secondary outcome measures (survival, pulmonary function, and MMT). Conclusion: The trial revealed no evidence of a beneficial effect of TCH346 on disease progression in patients with ALS.

Peripheral neuropathy has been reported in association with chronic liver disease. However, the precise incidence, severity and characteristics of neuropathy, and the relationship of neuropathy to different etiologies of liver disease have not been defined. In this study, 58 patients with advanced liver disease were evaluated in detail for the presence of neuropathy. Peripheral (sensorimotor) neuropathy was found in 71% and autonomic neuropathy was found in 48% of the patients. Although the majority of patients were asymptomatic, neurological examination showed distal sensory loss to pain, or vibration or distal loss of reflexes in 17 patients (29%). Sensory neuropathy was seen more commonly than motor axonal polyneuropathy on nerve conduction studies. Quantitative sensory testing was frequently abnormal (62%) and cooling thresholds were more affected than vibration thresholds. Overall, the pattern of neuropathy in patients with liver disease conformed to the pattern expected in "dying back" or length-dependent neuropathy. The neuropathy was most severe in patients with advanced hepatic decompensation. Comparison of causes of liver disease showed no significant differences in the severity of neuropathy among the different etiologies. In conclusion, axonal sensory-motor polyneuropathy and autonomic neuropathy are commonly seen in patients with end-stage liver disease of different causes.

To the Editor: The article by Chaudhry et al [1] addresses the reliability of nerve conduction studies (NCS) in patients with diabetic neuropathy. Perhaps the authors would consider providing additional information regarding the coefficient of variation, the standard deviation/mean, of their findings. Unlike ANOVA, the coefficient of variation can be readily understood by nonstatisticians and easily performed. It describes reliability in absolute numbers suitable …

We determined the inter- and intraexaminer reliability of nerve conduction measurements in six patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Each patient was examined by six electromyographers on two separate occasions at least 1 week apart. We obtained attributes of nerve conduction at each examination and analyzed the data by analysis of variance. Intraexaminer reliability was high for 11 of 12 measurements, and interexaminer reliability was high for eight of twelve. Three of the four measurements that varied between examiners were either sensory or motor amplitudes, attributes frequently used to measure disease progression or to assess the result of therapeutic intervention. Our results suggest that longitudinal nerve conduction measurements used to assess worsening or improvement over time should optimally be performed by a single examiner to minimize the degree of variability associated with different examiners.