Search

Background: Outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) versus (vs) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients presenting with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) with unprotected left main (ULM) as culprit vessel are not well represented in major clinical trials. We performed a meta-analysis and meta-regression of studies that compared the outcomes of CABG vs PCI in ULM in ACS. Methods: Medline, EmCare, CINHAL, Cochrane database, and Google Scholar were searched for studies comparing CABG vs PCI in patients who presented with ACS and was found to have ULM as culprit vessel. Our primary outcome was mortality at longest follow up. Our secondary Outcome was repeat revascularization at longest follow up. We used PM method with HKSJ adjustment to estimate risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Heterogeneity was assessed using I 2 statistics. Multivariable meta-regression analysis was used to account for heterogeneity. History of smoking, diabetes, hypertension and previous PCI was used for multivariable regression. R version 3.6.2 was used for all statistical analysis. Results: A total of 8 studies met our inclusion criteria. The follow up period varied from 6 months to 10 years. There was no significant difference in the risk of mortality between CABG vs PCI; RR: 1.31, CI: 0.76 - 2.27, I 2 = 71%. However, the PCI as compared to CABG was associated with higher risk repeat revascularization at longest follow up; RR: 2.64, 95% CI: 1.56 to 4.46, I 2 = 60%. Meta-regression analysis reported previous PCI to be associated with lower mortality with CABG [P value =0.01], while history of diabetes was associated with higher mortality with CABG [P value Conclusion: CABG vs PCI in ULM in ACS is associated with similar risk of mortality. Previous PCI and non-diabetics were associated with higher mortality with PCI as compared to CABG. However PCI as compared to CABG was associated with higher risk of repeat revascularizations.

Background: Cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) affects 35% of patients with pulmonary sarcoidosis (PS). CS presentation varies from asymptomatic patients to sudden cardiac death. The current screening modalities like EKG and conventional echocardiography lack sensitivity for early detection of CS. Speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) has shown potential for early detection of subclinical myocardial damage in patients with PS. We aimed to investigate the role of STE in early detection of CS. Methods: We queried Medline, EmCare, CINAHL, Cochrane Database and Google Scholar for articles investigating the role of left ventricle global longitudinal strain (LVGLS) in asymptomatic patients with PS versus (vs) controls. Studies that included patients with suspected or proven CS, patients with cardiac symptoms, arrhythmias, coronary artery disease or valvular abnormalities were excluded. The standard mean difference (SMD) in GLS for both groups was pooled using random effects model. Results: Our search yielded a total of 9 studies with a total of 967 patients with PS undergoing screening for CS. In individual studies, the baseline characteristics were not significantly different between both groups. Overall, the studies had more females than males. All patients in our cohort had preserved ejection fraction (EF) and no cardiac symptoms. The LVGLS was significantly decreased in the PS group as compared to controls, SMD: -3.98, (95% CI: -5.32 to -2.64; p-value 2 = 94.70%, Figure 1. Conclusion: As compared to controls, patients with PS with no clinically suspected or proven CS, and normal EF, have impaired LVGLS. More studies are warranted to investigate the role of LVGLS in CS screening.

Background: Octogenarians and nonagenarians are under-represented in major clinical trials studying the role of anticoagulation (AC) in atrial fibrillation (AF). These patients are at an increased risk of bleeding owing to their frailty, their propensity for falls, and frequently impaired kidney function. We performed a meta-analysis of studies that investigated the role of AC in these patients. Methods: We queried Medline, EmCare, CINHAL, Cochrane Database, and Google Scholar for studies investigating the role of AC for AF in octogenarians and nonagenarians. Our primary efficacy outcome was major thromboembolism (TE), and secondary safety outcome was major bleeding (MB). We used the PM method with HKSJ adjustment to estimate risk ratio (RR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Heterogeneity was assessed using Higgin’s I 2 . R version 3.6.2 was used for statistical analysis. Heterogeneity was addressed using outlier analysis. dmetar() package in R was used, and the pooled estimate was re-calculated, excluding the outliers. Results: Ten observational studies, including a total of 34,697 patients were included. There was no difference in the risk of TE [RR: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.49-1.38, I 2 =74%] or MB [RR: 1.00, 95% CI: 0.55-1.83, I 2 =88%] between the AC and Non-AC group. However, the pooled estimates were associated with considerable heterogeneity. Outlier analysis identified two studies "Perera et al., 2009" and "Yamashita et al., 2016" as an outlier for pooled estimation of TE, while [1] "Siu et al., 2014", "Bertozzo et al., 2016", "Ekerstad et al., 2018" and "Alnsasra et al., 2018" were outliers in the pooled estimate of MB. Following exclusion of outliers for each endpoint, the reanalyzed RR for TE and MB were [RR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.82- 1.09, I 2 =0%] and [RR: 1.57, 95% CI: 1.41- 1.74, I 2 =0%]. Conclusion: There was no difference in the risk of TE, while the risk of MB increased with the use of AC for AF in octogenarians and nonagenarians.

Background: Long term outcomes of culprit multi-vessel and left main patients who presented with Non-ST Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome (NSTE-ACS) and underwent either coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are not well defined. Randomized trials comparing the two modalities constituted mainly of patients with stable coronary artery disease (SCAD). We performed a meta-analysis of studies that compared the long term outcomes of CABG vs. PCI in NSTE-ACS. Methods: Medline, EmCare, CINAHL, Cochrane databases were queried for relevant articles. Studies that included patients with SCAD and ST-elevation myocardial infarction were excluded. Our primary outcome was major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 3-5 years, defined as a composite of all-cause mortality, stroke, re-infarction and repeat revascularization. The secondary outcome was re-infarction at 3 to 5 years. We used the Paule-Mandel method with Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman adjustment to estimate risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Heterogeneity was assessed using Higgin’s I 2 statistics. All statistical analysis was carried out using R version 3.6.2 Results: Four observational studies met our inclusion criteria with a total number of 6695 patients. At 3 to 5 years, the PCI group was associated with a higher risk of MACE as compared to CABG, (RR): 1.52, 95% CI: 1.28 to 1.81, I 2 =0% (PANEL A). The PCI group also had a higher risk of re-infarctions during the period of follow up, RR: 1.88, 95% CI 1.49 to 2.38, I 2 =0% (PANEL B). Conclusion: In this meta-analysis, CABG was associated with a lower risk of MACE and re-infarctions as compared to PCI during 3 to 5 years follow up period.

Background: The optimum revascularization modality in multi-vessel and left main disease patients presenting with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (non-STE-ACS) is not well studied. The current recommendations are based on studies that primarily included patients with stable angina. Patients with non-STE-ACS were under-represented in clinical trials. We performed a meta-analysis of studies comparing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) vs. percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in non-STE-ACS, and reporting 30 days major adverse cardiac events (MACE). Methods: We searched Medline, EmCare, CINAHL, Cochrane database, and Google Scholar for relevant articles. We excluded studies that included patients with stable coronary artery disease and ST elevation myocardial infarction. Our primary outcome was 30 days MACE defined as all-cause death, stroke, repeat revascularization and re-infarction. We used the Paule-Mandel method with the Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman adjustment to estimate risk ratio (RR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Heterogeneity was assessed using Higgin’s I 2 statistics. To account for heterogeneity, a meta-regression analysis was performed. Results: Five observational studies met our inclusion criteria summing to a total number of 7161 patients. At 30 days, there was no difference between CABG vs. PCI in terms of MACE, RR: 0.96, 95% CI 0.38 to 2.39, I 2 = 81% (Panel A). A meta-regression analysis reported that a history of PCI was associated with a lower risk of MACE with CABG compared to PCI (Panel B). Conclusion: At 30 days, there was no difference in MACE between the CABG and PCI groups. However, a history of PCI was associated with a lower risk of MACE in patients who underwent CABG.