Search

Scientific Initiation (SI) is an educational activity that allows students to begin their scientific training and research under the guidance of an experienced researcher. While several studies have examined students’ perceptions of SI, research on the perspective of researchers working in this field is currently lacking. Thus, the aim of this study is to describes the design of a protocol to conduct a systematic review to identify the factors that influence the work of researchers in SI and explore the motivations that lead researchers to engage in research projects within institutions. Literature search will be done using the bibliographic databases, including Academic Search Premier, APA PsycNet, CINAHL Plus, ERIC, Scopus, SocINDEX and Web of Science. Original, peer-reviewed articles that examine the factors related to the work of researchers in SI will be included, without any restrictions of language or publication date. Original, peer-reviewed articles that examine the factors related to the work of researchers in SI will be included, without any restrictions of language or publication date. We aim to understand the factors that drive researchers to engage in SI research through a dissemination of the findings of this systematic review.

This is a protocol that will be followed to conduct a systematic review. The purpose is to compile an overview of experienced contextual factors influence on implementation, methods and strategies used, and implementation outcomes from managers and health care professionals perspective for people with disability.

This mixed methods systematic review aims to identify recruitment strategies and present the respective recruitment rates of health-related studies. It focuses on research concerned with socially isolated people with severe physical disabilities to frame a comprehensive recruitment model for cross-sectional-type, qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods investigations. One reviewer will employ a broad search strategy, including electronic databases, grey literature, reference lists, and forward snowballing. The details of the review strategy are presented in the protocol.

Systematic Review Protocol 2: Review Question 3

This is the protocol for an unfinished systematic scoping review. We encourage others to use and/or remix our methods in their own projects. Please cite this protocol in any published work resulting from its use.

A systematic review assessing the reliability and validity of social identification measures in healthy participants using COSMIN guidelines. Main review questions: How reliable and valid are measures of social identification in healthy participants? What are the psychometric properties and factor structure of these measures? To what extent are these measures theoretically informed through the Social Identity Approach including Self Categorisation and Social identification as a basis? There has been dispute between various social identity researchers in the quantification of social identification and whether it is uni-dimensional or multi-dimensional, in addition to its roots in the social identity approach. This review will attempt to identify factor structures of pre-existing social identification measures and their efficacy in capturing social identification.

This project aims to provide a systematic review of the scientific literature to examine the effects of plant diversity (taxonomic, functional or phylogenetic diversities) and vegetation management (mowing, grazing and nutrient addition) on soil carbon in grasslands. The understanding will be used to infer the potential for solar parks in the UK to enhance soil carbon through active land and biodiversity management of hosting grassland ecosystems. Version 1.1 (v1.1) of the review protocol was uploaded on 31st March 2020 and updated on 9th April 2020 (v1.2). Version 1.2 is the currently updated review protocol used for the systematic literature review, and is viewable from within the live project page (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/GXTM5).

Systematic Review Protocol