1. Olaparib Maintenance Therapy in Platinum-Sensitive Relapsed Ovarian Cancer.
- Author
-
Ledermann, Jonathan, Harter, Philipp, Gourley, Charlie, Friedlander, Michael, Vergote, Ignace, Rustin, Gordon, Scott, Clare, Meier, Werner, Shapira-Frommer, Ronnie, Safra, Tamar, Matei, Daniela, Macpherson, Euan, Watkins, Claire, Carmichael, James, and Matulonis, Ursula
- Subjects
- *
ADENOSINE diphosphate , *POLYMERASES , *CANCER patients , *BRCA genes , *PLACEBOS - Abstract
Background: Olaparib (AZD2281) is an oral poly(adenosine diphosphate [ADP]–ribose) polymerase inhibitor that has shown antitumor activity in patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancer with or without BRCA1 or BRCA2 germline mutations. Methods: We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 study to evaluate maintenance treatment with olaparib in patients with platinum-sensitive, relapsed, high-grade serous ovarian cancer who had received two or more platinum-based regimens and had had a partial or complete response to their most recent platinum-based regimen. Patients were randomly assigned to receive olaparib, at a dose of 400 mg twice daily, or placebo. The primary end point was progression-free survival according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors guidelines. Results: Of 265 patients who underwent randomization, 136 were assigned to the olaparib group and 129 to the placebo group. Progression-free survival was significantly longer with olaparib than with placebo (median, 8.4 months vs. 4.8 months from randomization on completion of chemotherapy; hazard ratio for progression or death, 0.35; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.25 to 0.49; P<0.001). Subgroup analyses of progression-free survival showed that, regardless of subgroup, patients in the olaparib group had a lower risk of progression. Adverse events more commonly reported in the olaparib group than in the placebo group (by more than 10% of patients) were nausea (68% vs. 35%), fatigue (49% vs. 38%), vomiting (32% vs. 14%), and anemia (17% vs. 5%); the majority of adverse events were grade 1 or 2. An interim analysis of overall survival (38% maturity, meaning that 38% of the patients had died) showed no significant difference between groups (hazard ratio with olaparib, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.63 to 1.39; P=0.75). Conclusions: Olaparib as maintenance treatment significantly improved progression-free survival among patients with platinum-sensitive, relapsed, high-grade serous ovarian cancer. Interim analysis showed no overall survival benefit. The toxicity profile of olaparib in this population was consistent with that in previous studies. (Funded by AstraZeneca; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00753545.) [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]
- Published
- 2012
- Full Text
- View/download PDF