Search

Background: Newborns with critical congenital heart disease (CCHD) require specialized delivery room management, but varying experience and knowledge can reduce confidence and impact care., Methods: A pre-delivery, structured huddle checklist was introduced, addressing team roles, expected physiology, and management plans. PDSA cycles incorporated guidelines and simulation-based education to improve confidence in specialized resuscitation strategies. Surveys were conducted at baseline and 6 months., Results: Baseline, all-respondent confidence in managing "all types of CCHD" was somewhat confident (median 3/5; IQR 2-4) increasing to moderately confident (4/5; IQR 2-4) at 6 months (p = 0.59). Respondents with 0-3 years' experience showed increased confidence over 6 months in identifying unstable infants (from baseline 24% to 67% moderately/very confident, p = 0.005), prostaglandin E1 needs (from 24% to 62%, p = 0.013) and sedation requirements (from 5% to 33%, p = 0.045)., Conclusion: Structured huddles improved confidence among less experienced team members, emphasizing the importance of shared mental models before CCHD deliveries., Competing Interests: Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature America, Inc.)

Objectives: To assess respiratory care guidelines and explore variations in management of very low birth weight (VLBW) infants within a collaborative care framework. Additionally, to gather clinical leaders' perspectives on guidelines and preferences for ventilation modalities., Study Design: Leaders from each NICU participated in a practice survey regarding the prevalence of unit clinical guidelines, and management, at many stages of care., Results: Units have an average of 4.3 (±2.1) guidelines, of 9 topics queried. Guideline prevalence was not associated with practice or outcomes. An FiO 2 requirement of 0.3-0.4 and a CPAP of 6-7 cmH 2 O, are the most common thresholds for surfactant administration, which is most often done after intubation, and followed by weaning from ventilatory support. Volume targeted ventilation is commonly used. Extubation criteria vary widely., Conclusions: Results identify trends and areas of variation and suggest that the presence of guidelines alone is not predictive of outcome., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature America, Inc.)

Objective: To estimate the association of transpyloric feeding (TPF) with the composite outcome of tracheostomy or death for patients with severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia (sBPD)., Study Design: Retrospective multi-center cohort study of preterm infants <32 weeks with sBPD receiving enteral feedings. We compared infants who received TPF at 36, 44, or 50 weeks post-menstrual age to those who did not receive TPF at any of those timepoints. Odds ratios were adjusted for gestational age, small for gestational age, male sex, and invasive ventilation and FiO 2 at 36 weeks., Results: Among 1039 patients, 129 (12%) received TPF. TPF was associated with an increased odds of tracheostomy or death (aOR 3.5, 95% CI 2.0-6.1) and prolonged length of stay or death (aOR 3.1, 95% CI 1.9-5.2)., Conclusions: Use of TPF in sBPD after 36 weeks was infrequent and associated with worse in-hospital outcomes, even after adjusting for respiratory severity at 36 weeks., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature America, Inc.)

Background: Inequity in neonatology may be potentiated within neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) by the effects of bias. Addressing bias can lead to improved, more equitable care. Understanding perceptions of bias can inform targeted interventions to reduce the impact of bias. We conducted a mixed methods study to characterize the perceptions of bias among NICU staff., Methods: Surveys were distributed to all staff (N = 245) in a single academic Level IV NICU. Respondents rated the impact of bias on their own and others' behaviors on 5-point Likert scales and answered one open-ended question. Kruskal-Wallis test (KWT) and Levene's test were used for quantitative analysis and thematic analysis was used for qualitative analysis., Results: We received 178 responses. More respondents agreed that bias had a greater impact on others' vs. their own behaviors (KWT p < 0.05). Respondents agreed that behaviors were influenced more by implicit than explicit biases (KWT p < 0.05). Qualitative analysis resulted in nine unique themes., Conclusions: Staff perceive a high impact of bias across different domains with increased perceived impact of implicit vs. explicit bias. Staff perceive a greater impact of others' biases vs. their own. Mixed methods studies can help identify unique, unit-responsive approaches to reduce bias., Impact: Healthcare staff have awareness of bias and its impact on their behaviors with patients, families, and staff. Healthcare staff believe that implicit bias impacts their behaviors more than explicit bias, and that they have less bias than others. Healthcare staff have ideas for strategies and approaches to mitigate the impact of bias. Mixed method studies are effective ways of understanding environment-specific perceptions of bias, and contextual assets and barriers when creating interventions to reduce bias and improve equity. Generating interventions to reduce the impact of bias in healthcare requires a context-specific understanding of perceptions of bias among staff., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to the International Pediatric Research Foundation, Inc.)

Background: Measurement of neonatal team resuscitation performance is critical to identify opportunities for improvement and to target education. An effective tool to measure team performance during infant resuscitations is lacking., Methods: We developed an in-hospital infant resuscitation performance tool (Infa-RePT) using the modified Delphi method. We employed a QI framework and targeted interventions, including the use of role responsibility checklists, mock codes, and an educational video. We tracked Infa-RePT scores, mock code team attendance, and confidence surveys. Our specific aim was to improve Infa-RePT score from a baseline of 7.4 to <5 (lower is better) over a 26-month period., Results: Twenty-five elements reached >80% consensus as essential components to include on the Infa-RePT. Independent observation showed 86% concordance on checklist items. Simulation (n = 26) and unit-based code (n = 10) Infa-RePT scores showed significant improvement after project start from 7.4 to 4.2 (p < 0.01) with special cause variation noted on control chart analysis. No significant difference was observed between simulations and in-unit codes. Staff confidence self-reports improved over the study period., Conclusions: Use of a novel scoring tool can help monitor team progress over time and identify areas for improvement. Focused interventions can improve resuscitation team performance., Impact: We developed and used a novel, comprehensive measurement tool for team infant resuscitation performance in both simulation and in-unit settings. Using QI methodology, team performance improved after the enhancement of a mock code simulation program. Review of team performance scores can highlight key areas to target interventions and monitor progress over time., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to the International Pediatric Research Foundation, Inc.)

Objective: Death certificates commonly contain errors, which hinders understanding of infant mortality. We, therefore, undertook a quality improvement (QI) initiative to improve death reporting in our neonatal intensive care unit (NICU)., Study Design: After our baseline assessment (January 1, 2015 to June 30, 2017), we implemented our QI initiatives using Plan, Do, Study, Act (PDSA) tests of change. We prospectively reviewed death certificates (July 1, 2017 to December 31, 2019) to evaluate the impact of our interventions., Results: The overall proportion of incorrect death certificates significantly decreased from 71 to 22% with special cause variation noted after the second PDSA cycle. The most common errors involved inaccurate or incomplete reporting of prematurity and errors in the sequence of events., Conclusion: Through a series of PDSA cycles focused on formal provider education and ongoing review, we significantly reduced inaccurate death reporting. These interventions are generalizable across NICUs and important to improve public health reporting accuracy., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature America, Inc.)

Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine (NPM) fellowship programs have undergone constant evolution since their first appearance in the 1960s. This article is the first in a seven-part series (Table 1) that critically evaluates the essentials of neonatology fellowship clinical and research education, performance assessment, and administrative support necessary to support NPM fellowship programs. This overview article will provide background on the history of NPM fellowship programs and provide a framework for the article series. Table 1 Essentials of NPM fellowship article series. Essentials of NPM fellowship Part 1: Overview of NPM fellowship  Description of the evolution of NPM Fellowship Part 2: Clinical education and experience  Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats of clinical education in NPM fellowship Part 3: Scholarship opportunities and threats  Scholarship requirements during NPM fellowship Part 4: Innovations in medical education  Critical analysis of current educational practices and andragogical innovations in NPM fellowship Part 5: Evaluation of competence and proficiency using milestones  Assessment of NPM fellows during training using competency-based medical education principles Part 6: Program administration  Administrative infrastructure and stakeholders necessary to run a NPM fellowship program Part 7: Careers in NPM  Career preparation and opportunities for NPM fellowship graduates., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature America, Inc. part of Springer Nature.)

Objective: Variation exists in neonatal platelet transfusion practices. Recent studies found potential harm in liberal platelet transfusion practices, supporting the use of lower transfusion thresholds. Our aim was to reduce non-indicated platelet transfusions through implementation of a restrictive platelet transfusion guideline., Study Design: Platelet transfusions from January 2017 to December 2019 were classified as indicated or non-indicated using the new guideline. Interventions included guideline implementation and staff education. Outcomes were evaluated using statistical process control charts. Major bleeding was the balancing measure., Result: During study, 438 platelet transfusions were administered to 105 neonates. The mean number of non-indicated platelet transfusions/month decreased from 7.3 to 1.6. The rate of non-indicated platelet transfusions per 100 patient admissions decreased from 12.5 to 2.9. Rates of major bleeding remained stable., Conclusions: Implementation of a restrictive neonatal platelet transfusion guideline significantly reduced potentially harmful platelet transfusions in our NICU without a change in major bleeding.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, resulting from infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has caused severe and widespread illness in adults, including pregnant women, while rarely infecting neonates. An incomplete understanding of disease pathogenesis and viral spread has resulted in evolving guidelines to reduce transmission from infected mothers to neonates. Fortunately, the risk of neonatal infection via perinatal/postnatal transmission is low when recommended precautions are followed. However, the psychosocial implications of these practices and racial/ethnic disparities highlighted by this pandemic must also be addressed when caring for mothers and their newborns. This review provides a comprehensive overview of neonatal-perinatal perspectives of COVID-19, ranging from the basic science of infection and recommendations for care of pregnant women and neonates to important psychosocial, ethical, and racial/ethnic topics emerging as a result of both the pandemic and the response of the healthcare community to the care of infected individuals.

Lung epithelial cell damage and dysfunctional repair play a role in the development of lung disease. Effective repair likely requires the normal functioning of alveolar stem/progenitor cells. For example, we have shown in a mouse model of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) that mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) protect against hyperoxic lung injury at least in part by increasing the number of Epcam + Sca-1 + distal lung epithelial cells. These cells are capable of differentiating into both small airway (CCSP + ) and alveolar (SPC + ) epithelial cells in three-dimensional (3D) organoid cultures. To further understand the interactions between MSC and distal lung epithelial cells, we added MSC to lung progenitor 3D cultures. MSC stimulated Epcam + Sca-1 + derived organoid formation, increased alveolar differentiation and decreased self-renewal. MSC-conditioned media was sufficient to promote alveolar organoid formation, demonstrating that soluble factors secreted by MSC are likely responsible for the response. This work provides strong evidence of a direct effect of MSC-secreted factors on lung progenitor cell differentiation.

Understanding mechanisms of childhood disease and development of rational therapeutics are fundamental to progress in pediatric intensive care specialties. However, Division Chiefs and Department Chairs face unique challenges when building effective laboratory-based research programs in Neonatal and Pediatric Intensive Care, owing to high clinical demands necessary to maintain competence as well as financial pressures arising from fund flow models and the current extramural funding climate. Given these factors, the role of institutional support that could facilitate successful transition of promising junior faculty to independent research careers is ever more important. Would standardized guidelines of such support provide greater consistency among institutions? We addressed preliminary questions during a national focus group, a workshop and a survey of junior and senior academicians to solicit recommendations for optimal levels of protected time and resources when starting an independent laboratory. The consensus was that junior faculty should be assigned no more than 8 wk clinical service and should obtain start-up funds of $500K-1M exclusive of a 5-y committed salary support. Senior respondents placed a higher premium on protected time than junior faculty.