Search

Objective and Design: This study examined the effects of the anti-obesity agents, phentermine and dexfenfluramine given alone or in combination, on in vitro and in vivo 5HT release from rat brain tissue., Results: In vitro, phentermine was without effect on basal [3H]5HT efflux from hypothalamic slices whereas dexfenfluramine (10 microM) evoked a 131% increase in [3H]5HT release. In combination, the two drugs did not alter [3H]5HT release beyond that caused by dexfenfluramine alone. At pharmacologically equivalent doses, phentermine (5.7 mg/kg, i.p.) caused a rapid, modest elevation, and dexfenfluramine (3 mg/kg, i.p.) a larger but equally rapid elevation of extracellular 5HT in the microdialysates from the rat anterior hypothalamus. In combination, the increase in extracellular 5HT evoked by these drugs was not significantly greater than the sum of their individual effects., Conclusions: This study provides evidence that phentermine's actions are not restricted to catecholamine systems and indicates that combining phentermine with dexfenfluramine results in an additive increase in neuronal 5HT release.

Objective and Design: It has been proposed that the anti-obesity agent, phentermine, may act in part via inhibition of monoamine oxidase (MAO). The ability of phentermine to inhibit both MAO(A) and MAO(B) in vitro has been examined along with that of the fenfluramine isomers, a range of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and sibutramine and its active metabolites., Results: In rat brain, harmaline and lazabemide showed potent and selective inhibition of MAO(A) and MAO(B), their respective target enzymes, with IC(50) values of 2.3 and 18 nM. In contrast, all other drugs examined were only weak inhibitors of MAO(A) and MAO(B) with IC(50) values for each enzyme in the moderate to high micromolar range. For MAO(A), the IC(50) for phentermine was estimated to be 143 microM, that for S(+)-fenfluramine, 265 microM and that for sertraline, 31 microM. For MAO(B), example IC(50)s were as follows: phentermine (285 microM), S(+)-fenfluramine (800 microM) and paroxetine (16 microM). Sibutramine was unable to inhibit either enzyme, even at its limit of solubility., Conclusion: We therefore suggest that MAO inhibition is unlikely to play a role in the pharmacodynamic properties of any of the tested drugs, including phentermine. Instead, the lack of potency of these drugs as MAO inhibitors is contrasted with their powerful ability either to inhibit the uptake of one or more monoamines (fluoxetine, paroxetine, sertraline, sibutramine's active metabolites) or to evoke the release of one or more monoamines (S(+)-fenfluramine, S(+)-norfenfluramine, phentermine). These differences in mode of action may be linked to the adverse cardiovascular events experienced with some of the releasing agents.

This study was designed to compare some behavioral and biochemical effects of chronic treatment with a range of antipsychotic drugs. Gene expression of enkephalin, chromogranin A, chromogranin B, and secretogranin II and their respective peptide products were studied with in situ hybridization and radioimmunoassays after daily oral administration of haloperidol, clozapine, risperidone, or zotepine for 21 days. In behavioral tests, significant catalepsy was induced by haloperidol only. All four antipsychotic drugs increased hind paw retraction time but only haloperidol also increased forelimb retraction time. In the caudate putamen, haloperidol increased both enkephalin mRNA expression and enkephalin tissue levels. Neither of these parameters was altered by the other three drugs. In the prefrontal cortex, antipsychotic drugs generated a distinct pattern of gene expression in two regards. First, the dopamine D(2) receptor antagonist, haloperidol, did not significantly alter synaptic protein levels or their encoding mRNAs. Secondly, there was a differential change in tissue levels and mRNA expression since secretogranin II was not affected by any tested antipsychotic drug. This study shows that different types of antipsychotic drug induce distinct behavioural effects as well as differential changes in the biosynthesis of synaptic proteins and their encoding mRNAs. The data reinforce the notion that haloperidol can be classed as a typical antipsychotic drug whilst clozapine, zotepine, and risperidone reflect their atypical classification.