Search

Introduction: Antiphospholipid antibody syndrome (APAS) is a condition associated with recurrent arterial and venous thrombosis, recurrent abortions, and thrombocytopenia either with or without lupus. In this study we have evaluated the impact of APAS on the renal transplant outcome of 174 patients., Method: Patients' APAS status was determined by the presence of anticardiolipin antibodies (ACA) and a history of clotting disorders. Serum samples from each patient were tested for the presence of ACA by the ELISA method. Transplant outcomes were monitored for > or = 1 yr., Results: Of 174 patients, 78 received renal transplants. Six of these 78 patients had APAS as evidenced by either recurrent microrenal angiopathy (2 patients), thrombocytopenia (1 patient) or frequent A-V shunt thrombosis (3 patients) along with high titers of ACA of IgM, IgG, or both subtypes at the time of their transplants. Each of these 6 patients thrombosed their renal allografts within a week of their transplants. The other 72 transplanted patients with no APAS were all doing well 1 yr post-transplant. The association between APAS and post-transplant renal thrombosis among these patients is highly significant (p < 0.0001). In contrast, no association was discerned between post-transplant thrombosis and prior sensitization to HLA CONCLUSION: Our data demonstrates that patients with APAS are at high risk for development of post-transplant renal thrombosis.

Although donor and recipient risk factors for renal allograft failure are well known after kidney transplantation, they are less well defined after simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of donor and recipient risk factors on the outcome of the renal allograft in simultaneous pancreas-kidney recipients. Simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant performed between 4/88 and 6/94 were reviewed (n = 61) and univariate (Kaplan-Meier) and multivariate (Cox regression) analyses of factors which affect kidney graft survival were performed. Twelve donor and eleven pre- and post-transplant recipient risk factors were evaluated. Overall kidney allograft survival rates at 1, 2 and 5 yr were 81%, 76% and 66%. Donor age > and = 40 yr (RR = 2.3), donor female gender (RR = 3.5), donor admission to pronouncement of brain death > and = 48 h (RR = 3), the occurrence of surgical complications (RR = 2.1), and serum > and = 2 mg/dl on post-transplant day (RR = 1.9) were independently associated with an increased hazard of graft failure. With the exception of length of donor admission, all of these factors were also shown to predict the risk of renal graft failure by univariate analysis. In conclusion, we have identified donor and recipient risk factors which independently predict the risk of renal graft failure after simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation. Whether the differences between our center-specific risk factors and those obtained from renal transplant registry data are true differences or simply reflect sampling error is unclear.

Although risk factors for failure of renal retransplants have been well studied, the impact of allograft nephrectomy on subsequent renal transplantation in the cyclosporin era is not well defined. The purpose of this study is to define the effect of nephrectomy of the primary allograft on subsequent allograft survival, early allograft function, incidence of acute rejection and patient sensitization. The records of 127 renal retransplant recipients were reviewed. Of these 127 patients who underwent retransplantation, 40 (31%) underwent nephrectomy of the primary allograft prior to retransplantation whereas 40 (31%) did not. Nephrectomy of cadaveric primary allografts was performed more commonly (48% vs 30%, p = 0.003) and earlier (78% vs 54% < 1 month post-transplant, p = 0.0006) in the pre-CSA period compared to the CSA period. Biopsy-proven acute rejection episodes occurred more frequently in the nephrectomy group (73% vs 42%, p = 0.03). Although primary allograft nephrectomy was associated with higher preformed antibody levels, it had no effect on early graft function, frequency of acute rejection or allograft outcome after retransplantation, in the CSA group. In conclusion, in the cyclosporin era, nephrectomy of the primary allograft has no significant influence on retransplantation.

Pancreas transplantation with bladder drainage of exocrine secretions may be associated with significant urologic complications. Stapled and hand-sewn duodenocystostomies were compared in 61 recipients of simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplants. Both methods resulted in similar urologic complication and allograft survival rates. Duodenal segment leaks were associated with significant morbidity and decreased patient and allograft survival.

We have refined our immunomagnetic bead (IM bead) procedures to isolate pure and viable lymphocyte subpopulation from pre-morteum (PM) blood for cadaver donor HLA typing, preliminary and final crossmatches (XMs). The results of 1220 XMs were compared using T/B lymphocytes isolated either from PM blood or spleen/lymphnode (SPLN) tissue. IM bead technique was used to isolate T/B cells from PM blood and nylon wool column (NWC) technique was used to isolate T/B cells from SPLN. When we compared the outcome of 800 T-cell crossmatches using T cells from PM blood or SPLN of 5 separate cadaver donors, NWC TXMs tended to be more falsenegative for high PRA (> 10%, total 500 XMs) as well as low PRA (< 10%, total 300 XMs) did not reach statistical significance. In contrast, NW BXM (420 B XM) were found to be far more false negative than IM bead BXM regardless of the PRA of the patients. In order to ensure that NWC BXMs were indeed false negative, 23 sera with known anti-DR antibodies were BXMed where antigen-specific B cells were isolated by both the techniques. Our results showed that IM bead BXM identified the DR specificities greater than 90% of the time, the titers of ab specificities were stronger (1:8). In comparison, NWB cell XMs were weak (titers 1:2), and the false negative rate for some ab was as high as 73%. Using IM bead and NWC techniques we compared our turnaround time (TAT) for cadaver donor typing, preliminary and final XMs.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)