1. Stability of sagittal split osteotomies. A comparison of three stabilization techniques.
- Author
-
Perrott DH, Lu YF, Pogrel MA, and Kaban LB
- Subjects
- Adolescent, Adult, Bone Screws, Bone Wires, Child, Female, Humans, Immobilization, Linear Models, Male, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Recurrence, Retrospective Studies, Internal Fixators, Mandible surgery, Osteotomy methods, Retrognathia surgery
- Abstract
The objective of this study was to retrospectively evaluate stability of mandibular advancement after bilateral sagittal split osteotomies were performed. Three different fixation and immobilization protocols were examined. Thirty-three patients were evaluated with preoperative, immediate postoperative, and long-term (mean, 13 months) lateral cephalometric radiographs. The patients were divided into three groups: group 1 (n = 10) had nonrigid internal fixation and 6 weeks of maxillomandibular fixation, group 2 (n = 12) had rigid internal fixation and immediate postoperative function, and group 3 (n = 11) had rigid internal fixation with maxillomandibular fixation for a mean of 14 days. Group 3 had the least amount of sagittal and vertical relapse. Differences in sagittal relapse were statistically significant between groups 1 and 3. Group 2 demonstrated greater sagittal relapse than did group 3, although the result was not statistically significant. This study suggests that the use of rigid internal fixation with a period of maxillomandibular fixation appears to be more stable than nonrigid internal fixation with maxillomandibular fixation or rigid internal fixation without maxillomandibular fixation.
- Published
- 1994
- Full Text
- View/download PDF