Search

Background: New three-dimensional echocardiographic automated software (HeartModel) is now available to quantify the left heart chambers. The aims of this study were to assess the feasibility, reproducibility, and analysis time of this technique and its correlation with manual three-dimensional echocardiography (3DE) and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) in children., Methods: Ninety-two children (5-17 years of age) were prospectively included in two separate protocols. In protocol 1, 73 healthy children underwent two-dimensional and three-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography. Left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), LV end-systolic volume (LVESV), LV ejection fraction (LVEF), and left atrial volume at ventricular end-systole (LAV) by automated 3DE were compared with the same measurements obtained using manual 3DE. In protocol 2, automated three-dimensional echocardiographic measurements from 19 children with cardiomyopathy were compared with CMR values., Results: Automated 3DE was feasible in 77% of data sets and significantly reduced the analysis time compared with manual 3DE. In protocol 1, there were excellent correlations for LVEDV, LVESV, and LAV between automated 3DE and manual 3DE (r = 0.89 to 0.99, P < .0001 for all) and a weak correlation for LVEF, despite contour adjustment (r = 0.57, P < .0001). Automated 3DE overestimated LVEDV, LVEF, and LAV with small biases and underestimated LVESV with wider bias. With contour adjustment, the biases and limits of agreement were reduced (bias: LVEDV, 0.9 mL; LVESV, -1.2 mL; LVEF, 2.2%). In protocol 2, correlations between automated 3DE with contour edit and CMR were good for LV volumes and LAV (r = 0.76 to 0.94, P < .0003 for all) but remained weak for LVEF (r = 0.46, P = .05). Automated 3DE slightly underestimated LV volumes (relative bias, -7.2% to -7.8%) and significantly underestimated LAV (relative bias, -31.6%). The limits of agreement were clinically acceptable only for LVEDV. Finally, test-retest, intraobserver, and interobserver variability values were low (<12%)., Conclusions: HeartModel is feasible, reproducible, faster than manual 3DE, and comparable with manual 3DE for measurements of LV and left atrial volumes in children >5 years of age. However, compared with CMR, only LVEDV measured by automated 3DE with contour edit seems applicable for clinical practice., (Copyright © 2018 American Society of Echocardiography. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Morphologic description of ventricular septal defect (VSD) is mandatory before performing the newly developed transcatheter closure procedure. Inaccurate estimation of defect size has been reported using conventional two-dimensional (2D) transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). The aim of this study was to assess VSD morphology and size using three-dimensional (3D) TTE compared with 2D TTE and surgery., Methods: Forty-eight children aged 21.4 ± 29.3 months with isolated muscular (n = 11 [22.9%]) and membranous (n = 37 [77.1%]) VSDs were prospectively included. Three-dimensional images were acquired using full-volume single-beat mode. Minimal diameter, maximal diameter, and systolic and diastolic VSD areas were measured from 3D data sets using multiplanar reconstruction mode (QLAB 9). Maximal-to-minimal VSD diameter ratio was used to assess VSD geometry. Linear regression analysis and the Bland-Altman method were used to compare 3D measurements with 2D and surgical measurements in a subgroup of 15 patients who underwent surgical VSD closure., Results: VSD 3D diameters and areas were measured in all patients (100%; 95% CI, 92.6%-100%). Maximal diameter was lower on 2D TTE compared with 3D TTE (7.3 vs 11.3 mm, P < .0001). Mean bias was 4 mm, with 95% of values ranging from -1.76 to 9.75 mm. Correlation between 3D maximal diameter and surgical diameter was strong (r(2) = 0.97, P < .0001), while correlation between maximal 2D diameter and surgical diameter was moderate (r(2) = 0.63, P < .0001). VSDs had an oval shape when assessed by 3D TTE. Maximal-to-minimal diameter ratio assessed by 3D TTE was significantly higher in muscular VSDs compared with membranous VSDs (3.20 ± 1.51 vs 2.13 ± 1.28, respectively, P = .01). VSD area variation throughout the cardiac cycle was 32% and was higher in muscular compared with membranous VSDs (49% vs 26%, P = .0001)., Conclusions: Three-dimensional TTE allows better VSD morphologic and maximal diameter assessment compared with 2D TTE. VSD shape and its changes during the cardiac cycle can be visually and quantitatively displayed. Three-dimensional echocardiography may thus be particularly useful before and during percutaneous VSD closure., (Copyright © 2016 American Society of Echocardiography. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)