Search

Background and Aims: Symptomatic pancreatic walled-off necrosis (WON) may be managed by endoscopic transmural drainage and endoscopic transmural necrosectomy, with stent placement at endoscopic drainage sites. The optimal stent choice is yet to be determined. We compared outcomes after endoscopic management of WON using either large-caliber fully covered self-expandable metal stents (LC-SEMSs) or double-pigtail plastic stents (DPPSs)., Methods: We performed a retrospective comparison of outcomes among patients who received LC-SEMSs or DPPSs before endoscopic transmural necrosectomy for WON., Results: Among 94 patients included, WON resolution rates did not differ between the DPPS (36 patients) and LC-SEMS (58 patients) groups, whether concomitant percutaneous drainage was considered a failure (75% vs 82.8%; P = .36) or not (91.7% vs 94.8%; P = .55). Of 75 patients (80%) successfully treated without percutaneous drainage, 37 (49%) underwent endoscopic transmural drainage without subsequent endoscopic transmural necrosectomy. WON was more likely to resolve without subsequent endoscopic transmural necrosectomy in the LC-SEMS group than the DPPS group (60.4% vs 30.8%; P = .01). WON resolution without subsequent endoscopic transmural necrosectomy remained more likely with LC-SEMSs (odds ratio, 4.5 [95% confidence interval, 1.5-15.5]) after adjusting for patient age and size and location of WON. Rates of adverse events were similar except for clinically significant bleeding requiring endoscopic intervention, which was higher with DPPSs than LC-SEMSs (14% vs 2%; P = .02)., Conclusion: Management of pancreatic WON with LC-SEMSs appears to decrease both the need for repeated necrosectomy procedures and the risk of intervention-related hemorrhage., (Copyright © 2018 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background and Aims: Endoscopic transluminal drainage of symptomatic walled-off necrosis (WON) is a good management option, although the optimal choice of drainage site stent is unclear. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare metal stents (MSs) and plastic stents (PSs) in terms of WON resolution, likelihood of resolution after 1 procedure, and adverse events., Methods: An expert librarian queried several databases to identify studies that assessed WON management, and selection was according to a priori criteria. Publication bias, heterogeneity, and study quality were evaluated with the appropriate tools. We performed single and 2-arm meta-analyses for noncomparative and comparative studies using event rate random-effects model and odds ratio (OR)/difference in means, respectively., Results: We included 41 studies involving 2213 patients. In 2-arm study meta-analysis, WON resolution was more likely with MSs compared with PSs (OR, 2.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.7-4.6; P < .001). Resolution with a single endoscopic procedure was similar between stents (47% vs 44%), although for those cases requiring more than 1 intervention, the MS group had fewer interventions, favored by a mean difference of -.9 procedures (95% CI, -1.283 to -.561). In single-arm study meta-analysis, when compared with PSs, MS use was associated with lower bleeding (5.6% vs 12.6%; P = .02), a trend toward lower perforation and stent occlusion (2.8% vs 4.3%, P = .2, and 9.5% vs 17.4%, P = .07), although with higher migration (8.1% vs 5.1%; P = .1)., Conclusion: Evidence suggests that MSs are superior for WON resolution, with fewer bleeding events, trend toward less occlusion and perforation rate, but increased migration rate compared with PSs., (Copyright © 2018 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background and Aims: Malignant vascular invasion usually results from gross direct infiltration from a primary tumor and impacts cancer staging, prognosis, and therapy. However, patients may also develop a remote malignant thrombi (RMT), defined as a malignant intravascular thrombus located remote and noncontiguous to the primary tumor. Our aim was to compare EUS, CT, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings of RMT and to explore the potential impact on cancer staging., Methods: Patients with RMT were identified from a prospectively maintained EUS database. Retrospective chart review was performed to obtain EUS, CT/MRI, clinical, and outcome data., Results: A median of 3 FNAs (range, 1-8) was obtained from RMT in 17 patients (60 ± 14.1 years, 56% men) between April 2003 and August 2016, with the finding of malignant cytology in 12 patients (70.6%; 10 positive, 2 suspicious). CT/MRI detected the RMT in 5 patients (29.4%), 4 of whom had positive or suspicious EUS-FNA cytology. Among the 8 newly diagnosed pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PaC) patients, CT did not detect the RMT in 5 (63%), of whom 3 patients had positive or suspicious intravascular EUS-FNA cytology. For newly diagnosed PaC patients (n = 8), the EUS-FNA diagnosis of a biopsy specimen-proven RMT upstaged 3 patients (37.5%) and converted 2 patients (25%) from CT resectable to unresectable disease. No adverse events were reported. The mean follow-up was 18.9 ± 27.7 months., Conclusions: Our study demonstrates the ability and potential safety of intravascular FNA to detect radiographically occult RMT, which substantially impacts cancer staging and resectability., (Copyright © 2017 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background and Aims: The presence and significance of epithelial denudation among treatment-naïve pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) remain undetermined. The aims of this study were to determine the prevalence, extent, and predictors of epithelial denudation in treatment-naïve PCLs., Methods: Single-center retrospective study including patients who underwent EUS preceded by cross-sectional imaging and who subsequently underwent surgical resection of treatment-naïve PCLs. Surgically resected PCLs were reviewed by a pathologist in a fashion that allowed evaluation from evenly distributed regions of the cyst., Results: A total of 140 patients were identified (60% female, mean age 63 years). Eighty-five cysts (60.7%) were classified as intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs), 33 (23.5%) as main duct IPMNs (m-IPMNs), 11 (7.9%) as serous cystadenomas (SCAs), and 11 (7.9%) were composed of other cyst subtypes. A greater extent of epithelial denudation was seen in mucinous cystic neoplasm (MCN) compared with IPMN and SCA (mean percentage of denuded epithelium 45.1%, 10.8%, and 22.4%, respectively [P < .0001]). An association existed between the extent of denuded epithelium and degree of cyst epithelial dysplasia for IPMN and MCN combined (mean percentage of denuded epithelium for low-, moderate-, and high-grade dysplasia being 23.3%, 4.5%, and 1.2%, respectively; P = .02). PCLs resected from the neck and/or body and/or tail of the pancreas were associated with a greater extent of mean percentage of denuded epithelium than PCLs resected from the head and/or uncinate of the pancreas (23.9% vs 13.4%; P = .035)., Conclusions: The presence and extent of cyst epithelial denudation of treatment-naïve PCLs vary with cyst histology and other factors. The observation of denudation after intracystic ablative therapy may not provide an adequate metric of successful intervention. Further studies are needed to validate these findings., (Copyright © 2016 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The true efficacy of EUS-guided ethanol lavage (EEL) of pancreatic cystic neoplasms is unclear. This study aimed to assess long-term outcomes and adverse events of EEL by using a standardized protocol., Methods: Single-center, prospective, pilot study in which participants with suspected mucinous cyst neoplasms or branch duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms ≥1 cm in maximum diameter underwent EEL with 80% ethanol. Follow-up cross-sectional imaging was obtained to assess for changes in cyst volume., Results: Twenty-three patients underwent EEL (57% male, mean age 70 years). Mean duration of follow-up was 40 months (range 9-82 months). Mean calculated final concentration of ethanol achieved in treated cysts was 50% (range 0%-79%). Complete resolution of pancreatic cystic neoplasms occurred in 2 participants (9%). When stratified into those participants who achieved ≥80% versus <80% reduction in cyst volume, no statistically significant differences were seen with regard to patient demographics, cyst characteristics, or final concentration of ethanol achieved in the treated cyst. Greater decreases in cyst volume were seen in presumed nonmucinous cysts compared with presumed mucinous cysts (P = .006). Two early adverse events occurred. Five participants died during the study follow-up period (4 from nonpancreatic causes), including 1 participant who was diagnosed with pancreatic adenocarcinoma thought to have arisen from the treated branch duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm 41 months after undergoing EEL., Conclusions: As performed in this study, EEL therapy does not appear to be a promising method for prevention of malignancy in pancreatic cysts. Endoscopic methods that effectively and completely ablate pancreatic cystic neoplasms are needed. (, Clinical Trial Registration Number: NCT02158039.)., (Copyright © 2016 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Pancreatic cancer (PC) often produces pain that is difficult to control. Celiac neurolysis (CN) is performed with the goal of improving pain control and quality of life while reducing opioid-related side effects., Objective: We aimed to evaluate whether CN provides a survival advantage for PC patients., Design: Retrospective case-control study., Setting: Single tertiary-care referral center., Patients: Review of a prospectively maintained database identified patients with unresectable PC who underwent CN over a 12-year period. Each patient was matched to 2 control patients with unresectable PC., Intervention: CN, which included both celiac plexus neurolysis (CPN) and celiac ganglia neurolysis (CGN)., Main Outcome Measurements: Median survival in Kaplan-Meier curves and hazard ratios., Results: A total of 417 patients underwent CN and were compared with 840 controls with PC. Baseline characteristics were similar except the CN group had greater weight loss and pain requiring opioids. A mean of 16.6 ± 5.8 mL of alcohol was administered. For patients who underwent CN, the median survival from the time of presentation was shorter compared with controls (193 vs 246 days; hazard ratio 1.32; 95% confidence interval, 1.13-1.54). There was no difference in survival with unilateral or bilateral injection. However, EUS-guided CN was associated with longer survival compared with non-EUS approaches, and those who received CPN had longer survival compared with CGN., Limitations: Single center, retrospective., Conclusion: Our study suggests that CN is an independent predictor of shortened survival in PC patients. A prospective study is needed to verify the findings and determine whether shortened survival results from CN or from other features such as performance status and tumor-related characteristics. It is also imperative to verify our finding that EUS-guided CN provides a survival advantage over other approaches and whether CPN prolongs survival compared with CGN., (Copyright © 2015 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: EUS can provide access to the main pancreatic duct (MPD) for therapeutic intervention. The long-term clinical success of EUS-guided MPD interventions is unknown., Objective: To determine technical and clinical success rates, predictors of success, and long-term outcomes of EUS-guided MPD intervention., Design: Retrospective, single-center study., Setting: Tertiary-care referral center., Patients: Forty-five patients., Intervention: EUS-guided MPD stent retrieval or placement., Main Outcome Measurements: Technical and clinical success rates, adverse events, and long-term clinical outcomes., Results: Among the 45 patients, 37 had undergone failed ERCP, and 29 had surgically altered anatomy. Median follow-up after initial EUS-guided intervention was 23 months. Two patients underwent EUS for stent removal, and EUS-guided MPD stent placement was attempted in 43 patients. Technical success was achieved in 32 of 43 patients (74%) with antegrade (n = 18) or retrograde (n = 14) stent insertion. Serious adverse events occurred in 3 patients (6%). Patients underwent a median of 2 (range 1-6) follow-up procedures for revision or removal of stents, without adverse events. Complete symptom resolution occurred in 24 of 29 patients (83%) while stents were in place, including all 6 with nondilated ducts. Stents were removed in 23 patients, who were then followed for an additional median of 32 months; 4 patients had recurrent symptoms. Among the 11 failed cases, most had persistent symptoms or required surgery., Limitations: Retrospective study design, individualized patient management., Conclusion: EUS-guided MPD intervention is feasible and safe, with long-term clinical success in the majority of patients. EUS provides important treatment options, particularly in patients who would otherwise undergo surgery., (Copyright © 2013 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Osteoclastic and pleomorphic giant cell tumors of the pancreas are rare entities that have been typically described only in single case reports. We report on our experience with a series of 5 patients with pancreatic giant cell tumors seen at our institution., Methods: This was a retrospective study involving a search of the study institution's medical records from 2001 to 2007 for patients diagnosed with giant cell-containing neoplasms of the pancreas., Results: Five patients (2 women, 3 men) were identified. Age range was 59 to 81 years, with a mean of 70.2 years. None were current or former smokers. None had a history of alcohol abuse or preexisting pancreatitis of any kind. On EUS, tumors tended to be large, with a mean diameter of 47 mm (range 20-70 mm). All tumors had a heterogeneous echotexture and a distinct appearance when compared with the typical appearance of adenocarcinoma when viewed via EUS. The diagnosis of giant cell tumor of the pancreas, as well as the subtype, was made via EUS-guided FNA of the pancreatic lesion. Patients with pleomorphic giant cell tumors of the pancreas had a poor clinical course with a rapid decline, whereas those with mixed or osteoclastic giant cell tumors tended to have a better outcome, with a greater long-term survival. One patient is still alive more than 18 months after diagnosis., Limitation: Retrospective study., Conclusions: Giant cell tumors of the pancreas have unique clinical, endoscopic, and cytologic features. The risk factors for these lesions may be different from those associated with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Some giant cell tumor subtypes may carry a more favorable prognosis than pancreatic adenocarcinoma, and awareness and recognition of these differences can affect patient care.

Background: Information regarding the natural history, clinical characteristics, and outcomes of disconnected pancreatic duct syndrome (DPDS) is limited., Objective: To describe clinical characteristics and outcomes of DPDS., Design: A retrospective review of the Mayo Clinic endoscopy and hospital service database., Setting: Tertiary-referral center., Patients: We identified 31 DPDS cases from 1999 to 2006., Interventions: Endoscopic drainage of pancreatic-fluid collections., Main Outcome Measurements: The relationship between demographic and clinical data with endoscopic treatment and clinical outcomes in DPDS cases., Results: The median patient age was 53 years (range 20-83 years); 48% were men. The most common etiology of acute pancreatitis (AP) was biliary (55%) followed by idiopathic (27%). The median interval between the diagnoses of AP and DPDS was 56 days (range 3-251 days); the median follow-up after the last ERCP or surgical procedure was 7 months (range 0-90 months). The DPDS location included the following: pancreas head 6%, neck 58%, body 26%, and tail 10%. Twenty-six patients had initial endoscopic treatment (19 had long-term improvement; 7 failed treatment and required surgery) and 5 underwent immediate surgery. Mortality was 0%; 26% developed chronic pancreatitis (CP) and 16% diabetes mellitus (DM); 10% resolved completely, 45% had smaller fluid collections, and 26% patients were lost to follow-up. No relationship between demographic and clinical data with endoscopic and clinical outcomes was found., Conclusions: Endoscopic treatment temporarily improved DPDS, with a failure rate of 23%. Immediate surgery was not required in all cases. CP and/or pancreatic atrophy occurred relatively shortly after the DPDS diagnosis in 26% and DM in 16% of cases. DPDS did not lead to mortality. Early surgery may be considered after initially stabilizing the fluid collection with endoscopic therapy.

Background: The diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis can be difficult and often requires a larger specimen than can be provided by FNA alone to determine if the tissue sample obtained with EUS trucut biopsy (TCB) is sufficient to allow adequate histologic review to establish the diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis., Methods: EUS TCB was performed in patients presenting with obstructive jaundice who were suspected of having autoimmune pancreatitis based on their clinical, laboratory and imaging studies. The charts were retrospectively reviewed to determine the feasibility of TCB., Results: Between August 2002 and June 2004, 3 patients with obstructive jaundice and suspected autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) underwent EUS TCB. In each case, a diagnosis of pancreatic cancer also was considered, and surgical resection was the planned therapy before the patient underwent EUS TCB. Histologic review of the TCB specimens established the diagnosis of AIP in two patients and identified nonspecific changes of chronic pancreatitis in the third patient. EUS-guided FNA was performed in two of the 3 patients and failed to establish the diagnosis in either patient. Other than mild transient abdominal pain (n = 1), no complications were identified., Conclusions: This preliminary study suggests that EUS TCB can safely establish the diagnosis of AIP. Doing so helps guide management and may help to avoid unnecessary surgery. Prospective studies are needed to verify these findings and to more clearly define the role of EUS TCB in these patients.

Background: Morbidity associated with pancreaticoduodenectomy usually results from complications associated with the pancreaticojejunal anastomosis, in particular, a pancreatic leak. Four patients with retained transanastomotic pancreatic stent-induced complications after pancreaticduodenectomy were identified., Methods: Medical records for the 4 patients were reviewed, and telephone interviews were conducted., Observations: Each patient underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy for a peripapillary tumor with creation of a pancreaticojejunal anastomosis by using an internal 8F Silastic stent. Subsequent evaluation for steatorrhea (n=3) or recurrent pancreatitis (n=1) led to discovery of a retained pancreatic stent. In one patient, the stent was incidentally discovered. Steatorrhea significantly improved (n=1) or resolved (n=2) after stent removal. The patient with pancreatitis has not experienced another episode., Conclusions: The possibility of a retained stent should be considered in patients presenting with steatorrhea or pancreatitis after pancreaticoduodenectomy.