1. Endoscopic internal drainage of complex bilomas and biliary leaks by transmural or transpapillary/transfistulary access.
- Author
-
Lorenzo D, Bromberg L, Arvanitakis M, Delhaye M, Fernandez Y Viesca M, Blero D, Pezzullo M, Racapé J, Lucidi V, Le Moine O, Devière J, and Lemmers A
- Subjects
- Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde, Endosonography, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Stents, Treatment Outcome, Biliary Tract Diseases, Drainage
- Abstract
Background and Aims: Bilomas most frequently result from postoperative bile leaks. The endoscopic conventional treatment is sphincterotomy ± stent placement. In complex cases, such as altered anatomy or failure of conventional treatment, transpapillary/transfistulary (TP/TF) drainage or EUS-guided transmural drainage (EUS-TD) may obviate additional biliary surgery. This study reports our experience with treating biloma secondary to refractory biliary leak with TP/TF drainage or EUS-TD and evaluates the safety and outcomes associated with this approach., Methods: This observational study focused on consecutive patients managed for biliary leakage (diagnosis based on imaging and/or bile outflow from a surgical drain) at a tertiary care hospital (2007-2017). TP/TF drainage was performed by double-pigtail stent(s) placement to drain the biloma through the leak during ERCP. For EUS-TD, plastic stent(s) were placed under EUS control. Primary outcomes were a composite of clinical success (patient free of sepsis after percutaneous drain removal and, in patients with benign disease, removal of all endoscopically placed stents, without need for reintervention) and biloma regression (<3 cm) at last follow-up., Results: Thirty patients (men, 57%; median age, 55 years) were included. Most biliary leaks resulted from cholecystectomy (27%) and hepatectomy (50%). Initial EUS-TD and TP/TF drainage were performed in 14 (47%) and 16 (53%) patients, respectively. At last follow-up (median, 33.2 months), clinical success and primary outcome were achieved in 70.4% of patients (EUS-TD, 75%; TP/TF, 67%). Additional surgery was necessary in 1 patient. Rate of serious adverse events was 23% (7/30), of which 13% (4/30) were procedure related. There were 4 deaths during the course of treatment, 2 of which were related to endoscopic interventions (hemorrhage and fibrillation)., Conclusions: TP/TF drainage or EUS-TD is technically feasible with high clinical success and may avoid the need for additional surgery in complex cases or in patients with altered anatomy., (Copyright © 2022 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF