Search

Objective: A number of publicly available rating algorithms are used to assess hospital performance in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). However, concerns remain that these algorithms fail to correlate with each other and inadequately capture the case complexity of individual center practices., Methods: Composite star ratings for isolated CABG from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons public reporting database were extracted for 2018-2019. U.S. News & World Report Best Hospitals was used to extract CABG ratings as well as overall cardiology and heart surgery ranking, and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Hospital Compare was used to extract CABG volume and 30-day mortality. Spearman correlation coefficients were used to assess possible relationships. Expert opinion on risk adjustment and program evaluation was incorporated., Results: Correlations between Society of Thoracic Surgeons star rating and U.S. News & World Report overall ranking in cardiology and heart surgery (r = 0.15) and Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 30-day mortality (r = -0.27) were poor. Society of Thoracic Surgeons star rating correlated weakly with U.S. News & World Report CABG ratings (r = 0.33) and with Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services CABG volume (r = 0.32), whereas the latter 2 correlated moderately (r = 0.52) with each other. Of the 75 centers with accredited cardiac surgery training programs, 13 (17%) did not participate in Society of Thoracic Surgeons public reporting. Important gaps were identified in risk assessment, and potential solutions are proposed., Conclusions: Correlations between current CABG public reporting systems are weak. Further work is needed to refine and standardize CABG rating systems to more adequately capture the scope and complexity of an individual center's clinical practice and to better inform patients., (Copyright © 2022 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: The safety, efficacy, and learning curve for robotic pancreatoduodenecomy has been reported; however, the outcomes and learning curve of robotic pancreatoduodenecomy with vascular resections remain unknown. Our aim was to evaluate the outcomes of robotic pancreatoduodenecomy with vascular resections compared with robotic pancreatoduodenecomy without vascular resection and to identify the learning curve and benchmarks for improved performance during robotic pancreatoduodenecomy with vascular resections., Methods: A retrospective review of consecutive patients who underwent robotic pancreatoduodenecomy with vascular resections and robotic pancreatoduodenecomy between 2011 and 2017. Patients were analyzed consecutively, and a cumulative sum analysis was performed to detect improvements in performance over time., Results: Of 380 consecutive robotic pancreatoduodenecomy patients, 50 (13%) underwent robotic pancreatoduodenecomy with vascular resections. Compared with robotic pancreatoduodenecomy, robotic pancreatoduodenecomy with vascular resections were more likely to have had pancreatic adenocarcinoma (84% vs 42%) and had received neoadjuvant therapy (35% vs 65%, P < .01). Robotic pancreatoduodenecomy with vascular resections operative time revealed a steady, significant decrease (Rho = -0.38, p = .006) with marked initial improvement after the first 8 cases and maturation of the learning curve after 35 cases. A significant decrease in duration of the hospital stay was observed throughout the experience (Rho = -0.528, P < .0001), whereas margin status, pancreatic fistula, major morbidity, and mortality remained constant and comparable to robotic pancreatoduodenecomy alone., Conclusion: Robotic pancreatoduodenectomy with vascular resections is safe and feasible. For surgeons who have surpassed the learning curve of robotic pancreatoduodenectomy, it appears that improvements in performance of robotic pancreatoduodenecomy with vascular resections can be observed after 35 cases., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Platelet transfusion is utilized increasingly for traumatic brain injury (TBI) for the reversal of aspirin (ASA) therapy. Assessment of platelet inhibition and reversal by platelet transfusion after TBI has not been adequately characterized., Methods: A retrospective cohort analysis of TBI patients at a level I trauma center (January 2008-December 2009) was performed. The Aspirin Response Test (ART; VerifyNow) was used to assess platelet inhibition in TBI patients and guide platelet transfusion in patients with ASA-induced suppression. A follow-up ART was obtained after platelet administration. Primary endpoints were progression of intracranial hemorrhage on computed tomography, need for craniotomy, and mortality., Results: We analyzed 84 patients (median age, 78 [interquartile range, 64-86)]; 54% male). ASA use was documented in 36 (42%) patients. Initial ART indicated platelet dysfunction in 54 (64%) patients, including 42% of patients without a documented history of ASA use. Of the patients with a documented history of ASA, 2.4% had a normal ART. Of those with an initial ART of <550 ASA response units, 45 received platelets. Repeat ART demonstrated reversal of inhibition in 29 patients (64.4%). Initial responders to transfusion received a greater volume of platelets, suggesting a dose-response relationship. Logistic regression revealed a trend toward higher mortality in nonresponders to transfusion (P = .09). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed that ART results increased prediction of poor outcome compared with ASA history alone (area under the curve = 0.760 and 0.775, respectively)., Conclusion: The ART should be used to better target and guide platelet transfusions in TBI patients with known or suspected ASA use history. Patients with occult platelet dysfunction can be identified, unnecessary platelet transfusions avoided, and the adequate volume of platelets administered to correct drug-induced dysfunction. A dose-response relationship between quantity of platelets transfused and reversal of ASA inhibition was observed., (Copyright © 2011 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: In the trauma population, the use of retrievable inferior vena cava filters (RIVCF) is rapidly gaining acceptance in patients at high risk for venous thromboembolism. This study reports the impact of an institutional protocol on retrieval rates of RIVCF at a level I trauma center., Methods: A review of an institutional Trauma Registry identified 94 consecutive patients who received RIVCF between January 2004 and February 2007 (group I) before the protocol was instituted. Under the protocol, 61 consecutive trauma patients received RIVCF between August 2007 and July 2008 (group II) and were prospectively followed., Results: Filter retrieval eligibility criteria were met in 81% (76/94) of patients in group I and in 61% (37/61) of patients in group II. Of those eligible, retrieval-attempt rates were 42% (32/76) in group I versus 95% (35/37) in group II (P < .001). Clinician oversight of the filter accounted for 89% (39/44) of failure of retrieval attempts; patient noncompliance accounted for the rest in group I. In group II, the latter accounted for all such failures. Retrieval was successful in 37% (28/76) and in 84% (31/37) of the eligible patients in groups I and II, respectively (P < .001). No retrieval procedure-related complications occurred., Conclusion: An institutional protocol for prospective monitoring of RIVCF significantly increases filter retrieval rate.

Objective: Integrated coronary revascularization combines minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting (MICABG) with left internal thoracic artery-left anterior descending artery grafting and percutaneous coronary intervention. We hypothesized that integrated coronary revascularization could result in successful revascularization in suitable patients with multivessel coronary artery disease., Methods: Between September 1996 and January 1998, 31 consecutive patients underwent integrated coronary revascularization. Twenty-two were male; mean age was 69 years (46-86 years) and 42% were older than 75 years. Eight patients (26%) had a Parsonnet score greater than 20%. Left ventricular ejection fraction was 46.3% +/- 12%; 6 patients (19%) had a left ventricular ejection fraction less than 35%., Results: The anastomosis time for MICABG with the internal thoracic artery was 14.6 +/- 5.2 minutes and the operating time was 105 +/- 20 minutes; 28 patients (90%) were extubated in the operating room. The internal thoracic artery anastomosis was patent in all 31 patients (100%). Percutaneous coronary intervention was performed before MICABG in 2 patients (7%), on the same day of MICABG in 16 patients (52%), on postoperative day 1 in 3 patients (9%), and on postoperative days 2 to 4 in 10 patients (32%). Postprocedure length of stay in the hospital was 2.7 +/- 1.0 days and 13 patients (42%) were discharged home on postoperative day 1 or 2. Three patients (9.6%) required repeat target vessel revascularization in the distribution of the previous percutaneous coronary intervention. All patients are alive without angina at a follow-up of 10.8 +/- 3.8 months., Conclusion: Our early results demonstrate that integrated coronary revascularization can be performed safely and effectively. Long-term results will be available from a prospective randomized trial now underway to compare integrated coronary revascularization with coronary artery bypass grafting for multivessel coronary artery disease.

Objective: Available risk assessment models are designed for standard coronary artery bypass grafting. We hypothesized that minimally invasive coronary bypass could improve on predicted outcome in extremely high-risk patients (Parsonnet score > 20%) by the current risk models., Methods: From September 1996 to September 1997, 27 consecutive extremely high-risk patients underwent minimally invasive coronary bypass. Seventeen patients were male; age was 73 +/- 12 years, and 63% of patients were older than 75 years. Left ventricular ejection fraction was 33.7% +/- 15% and 63% had an ejection fraction of less than 35%. The predicted 30-day mortality according to the System 97 model was 25.6% +/- 11.3%. The Parsonnet risk score was 36.2% +/- 11%; the predicted length of stay in the hospital was 15.3 +/- 3 days. The predicted risk of stroke according to the Multicenter Perioperative Stroke Risk Index was 22.3% +/- 11.7%., Results: Minimally invasive coronary bypass was isolated in 20 patients and integrated with angioplasty and stenting in 7 patients. The observed 30-day mortality was 0% (P < .01 vs predicted): at an average follow-up of 10.8 +/- 4.1 months, 26 patients (96.3%) are alive without angina; one patient with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome died on postoperative day 40 of acute pancreatitis. No patient had a stroke or neurologic deficit (P < .01 vs predicted). Patency of internal thoracic artery anastomosis was confirmed by angiography in all 27 patients. No patient required reoperation. Eighteen patients (67%) were extubated in the operating room. The observed length of hospital stay after minimally invasive coronary bypass was 3.8 +/- 2.6 days (P < .01 vs predicted)., Conclusion: On the basis of our results on a relatively small series of patients, we suggest that risk models geared for standard coronary bypass grafting may not be appropriate for minimally invasive coronary bypass.

Bacterial pneumonia is the most common cause of early morbidity and mortality (less than 2 weeks) after heart-lung transplantation. The majority (76%) of cultures taken from human donor tracheas at the time of explant grew bacteria. The abnormal immune response of the lung allograft and the common finding of bacterial contamination of lung donors led us to hypothesize that clinically silent bacterial contamination of the donor lung progresses to pneumonia in the recipient and that antibiotic treatment of donors will prevent the development of pneumonia in the recipient. Inocula of Streptococcus pneumoniae were instilled into the left middle lobe of normal and donor dogs to identify the number of bacteria that would result in pneumonia in a normal animal and the amount that, when given to a donor, would result in pneumonia in the recipient. Initial studies established that inocula of 10(4) colony-forming units of S. pneumoniae did not result in pneumonia in normal or immunosuppressed animals. When 10(4) colony-forming units or as few as 10(2) were instilled into the left middle lobe of donors 24 hours before explantation and use of the lung for transplantation, severe acute bronchopneumonia developed in all 18 recipients. Treatment of donors with aerosol and intravenous antibiotics, but not with either alone, prevented pneumonia in the recipients. We conclude that bacterial contamination of the donor lung leads to pneumonia in recipients. Intravenous and aerosol antibiotic treatment of donors with bacterial contamination prevents pneumonia in canine lung recipients. Treatment of human donors with this antibiotic regimen may decrease the prevalence of early bacterial pneumonia.

Current systemic immunosuppressive regimens are unable to prevent lung allograft rejection consistently and are associated with significant morbidity and death. Acute rejection has occurred in 40% and chronic rejection in 50% of our lung recipients. We hypothesized that regional immunotherapy with aerosolized cyclosporine would prevent or reduce lung allograft rejection while allowing for low systemic drug delivery. In a canine model of unilateral lung allotransplantation, aerosolized cyclosporine was delivered directly to the allograft. Acute rejection was prevented or reduced in all treated recipients. All control animals had severe acute rejection. Intragraft cyclosporine concentration was high and systemic drug delivery was low, as evidenced by low whole-blood cyclosporine levels and low tissue cyclosporine levels in skeletal muscle. Ninety-five percent of whole-blood trough cyclosporine levels were less than 150 ng/ml. Aerosolized cyclosporine was able to prevent or reduce acute pulmonary rejection and resulted in minimal systemic drug delivery.

A total of 351 cardiac transplantations performed between June 1, 1980, and Sept. 30, 1987, were reviewed to determine if infectious complications were more frequent in those patients requiring preoperative intravenous inotropic support, placement of an intraaortic balloon pump, or mechanical support with a left ventricular assist device or total artificial heart. One hundred forty-nine transplants (45%) were performed in these mortally ill patients. There was no statistically significant difference between patients with and without infection within each support group for the following: the number of in-patient days awaiting a donor heart, the number of days receiving support, the percent of patients with preoperative tracheal intubation, the length of the operation, and the percent of patients requiring reoperation for bleeding. The need for invasive methods of support (intraaortic balloon pump, left ventricular assist device, or total artificial heart) in patients awaiting heart transplantation increases the prevalence of perioperative nonviral infection. Preoperative mechanical support with a left ventricular assist device or total artificial heart significantly increases the risk of infection-related mortality.