Search

Objective: The present study compared the outcomes between conventional surgery and the hybrid approach of proximal surgery with adjunctive retrograde descending aortic endografting plus distal bare metal stenting in acute DeBakey type I dissection., Methods: From 2003 to 2011, 61 patients underwent surgical management for acute type A aortic dissection at our institution. Of these, 37 were DeBakey type I dissections: 18 patients (group 1) received conventional surgical repair alone, and 19 (group 2) underwent conventional hybrid surgery with adjunctive retrograde descending aortic stent grafting plus distal bare metal stenting., Results: The patients' baseline characteristics were comparable, including the incidence of preoperative malperfusion syndromes (P = .23). The intraoperative and postoperative characteristics were similar, except 4 (22%) patients in group 1 (vs 0 in group 2) had ongoing malperfusion postoperatively (P = .04). Overall, hospital mortality was 11% (n = 2) for group 1 versus 5% (n = 1) for group 2. At a mean follow-up of 50 months, 4 (25%) subjects in group 1 required secondary thoracoabdominal aortic reintervention versus none in group 2 (P = .03)., Conclusions: The use of adjunctive retrograde descending aortic endografting plus distal bare metal stenting during acute DeBakey type 1 dissection repair is a feasible method to enhance thoracoabdominal remodeling. This hybrid strategy improves perioperative outcomes and decreases late distal aortic complications compared with conventional surgical repair for acute DeBakey type I dissection. A prospective, multicenter study is warranted to definitively assess this promising new treatment paradigm., (Copyright © 2013 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The present study compared the outcomes between combined proximal descending aortic endografting plus distal bare metal stenting and conventional proximal descending aortic stent-graft repair in patients with type A and type B aortic dissection., Methods: From January 2003 to December 2010, 63 patients underwent endovascular treatment for acute (type A, 24; type B, 21) and chronic (type B, 18) aortic dissection. Of these, 40 patients underwent proximal descending aortic endografting plus distal bare metal stenting (group 1), and 23 underwent proximal descending stent-graft repair alone (group 2). All patients with type A dissection underwent open surgical intervention plus adjunctive retrograde endovascular repair., Results: The patients were comparable for baseline characteristics and treatment indicators, but more group 1 patients were active smokers (P = .03). The intraoperative characteristics were also similar, although 4 patients, all in group 2, developed malperfusion syndrome postoperatively (P = .02). The overall hospital mortality was 6%. At a mean follow-up of 49 months, 9 group 2 patients (43%) required unplanned secondary intervention compared with 4 in group 1 (11%; P = .007). Reintervention for thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm or visceral ischemia was performed in 4 patients (19%) from group 2 (P = .03). Late aortic-related deaths occurred in 1 (5 %) and 2 (5%) patients in groups 1 and 2, respectively., Conclusions: Combined proximal descending aortic endografting plus distal bare metal stenting for aortic dissection provides favorable short-term outcomes and decreases late distal aortic complications compared with conventional endovascular repair. These results support a more widespread application of this approach. A prospective, randomized trial is needed before definite conclusions can be made., (Copyright © 2012 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.)