Search

Background: The surgical treatment of malunions after midshaft clavicle fractures is associated with a number of potential complications and the surgical procedure is challenging. However, with appropriate and meticulous preoperative surgical planning, the surgical correction yields satisfactory results. The purpose of this study was to provide a guideline and detailed overview for the computer-assisted planning and 3-dimensional (3D) correction of malunions of the clavicle., Methods: The 3D bone surface models of the pathologic and contralateral sides were created on the basis of computed tomography data. The computer-assisted assessment of the deformity, the preoperative plan, and the design of patient-specific guides enabling compression plating are described., Results: We demonstrate the benefit and versatility of computer-assisted planning for corrective osteotomies of malunions of the midshaft clavicle. In combination with patient-specific guides and compression plating technique, the correction can be performed in a more standardized fashion. We describe the determination of the contact-optimized osteotomy plane. An osteotomy along this plane facilitates the correction and enlarges the contact between the fragments at once. We further developed a technique of a stepped osteotomy that is based on the calculation of the contact-optimized osteotomy plane. The stepped osteotomy enables the length to be restored without the need of structural bone graft. The application of the stepped osteotomy is presented for malunions of the clavicle with shortening and excessive callus formation., Conclusions: The 3D preoperative planning and patient-specific guides for corrective osteotomies of the clavicle may help reduce the number of potential complications and yield results that are more predictable., (Copyright © 2017 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Corrective osteotomies of malunited fractures of the proximal and distal humerus are among the most demanding orthopedic procedures. Whereas the restoration of the normal humeral anatomy is the ultimate goal, the quantification of the deformity as well as the transfer of the preoperative plan is challenging. The purpose of this study was to provide a guideline for 3-dimensional (3D) corrective osteotomies of malunited intra-articular fractures of the humerus and a detailed overview of existing and novel instruments to enlarge the toolkit for 3D preoperative planning and intraoperative realization using patient-specific guides., Methods: We describe the preoperative 3D deformity analysis, relevant considerations for the preoperative plan, design of the patient-specific guides, and surgical technique of corrective osteotomies of the humerus., Results: The presented technique demonstrates the benefit of computer-assisted surgery for complex osteotomies of the humerus from a preoperative deformity analysis to the creation of feasible surgical procedures and the generation of patient-specific guides., Conclusions: A 3D analysis of a post-traumatic deformity of the humerus, 3D preoperative planning, and use of patient-specific guides facilitate corrective osteotomies of complex malunited humeral fractures., (Copyright © 2016 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: In the presence of severe osteoarthritis, osteonecrosis, or proximal humeral fracture, the contralateral humerus may serve as a template for the 3-dimensional (3D) preoperative planning of reconstructive surgery. The purpose of this study was to develop algorithms for performing 3D measurements of the humeral anatomy and further to assess side-to-side (bilateral) differences in humeral head retrotorsion, humeral head inclination, humeral length, and humeral head radius and height., Methods: The 3D models of 140 paired humeri (70 cadavers) were extracted from computed tomographic data. Geometric characteristics quantifying the humeral anatomy in 3D were determined in a semiautomatic fashion using the developed computer algorithms. The results between the sides were compared for evaluating bilateral differences., Results: The mean bilateral difference of the humeral retrotorsion angle was 6.7° (standard deviation [SD], 5.7°; range, -15.1° to 24.0°; P = .063); the mean side difference of the humeral head inclination angle was 2.3° (SD, 1.8°; range, -5.1° to 8.4°; P = .12). The side difference in humeral length (mean, 2.9 mm; SD, 2.5 mm; range, -8.7 mm to 10.1 mm; P = .04) was significant. The mean side difference in the head sphere radius was 0.5 mm (SD, 0.6 mm; range, -3.2 mm to 2.2 mm; P = .76), and the mean side difference in humeral head height was 0.8 mm (SD, 0.6 mm; range, -2.4 mm to 2.4 mm; P = .44)., Conclusions: The contralateral anatomy may serve as a reliable reconstruction template for humeral length, humeral head radius, and humeral head height if it is analyzed with 3D algorithms. In contrast, determining humeral head retrotorsion and humeral head inclination from the contralateral anatomy may be more prone to error., (Copyright © 2016 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)