Search

Background: Limited data exist on the long-term outcomes of patients who undergo evaluation in a chest pain unit (CPU)., Methods: Our study included patients with chest pain at intermediate risk for acute cardiovascular events enrolled in the CHEER study. The primary outcome included a composite of death, myocardial infarction, acute heart failure, stroke, and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. The secondary outcome included a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, acute heart failure, stroke, revascularization, and unstable angina. Data were obtained through a medical record review. We compared outcomes between groups randomized to the CPU versus admission, those admitted from the CPU versus dismissed home, and those who were admitted versus dismissed home after a cardiac stress test in the emergency department., Results: The final analysis included 407 patients. Median surveillance length was 5.5 years. No differences in the primary outcome or secondary outcome existed between patients randomized to the CPU versus admitted to hospital (21.6% vs 20.2% and 29.9% vs 33.0%, respectively, P > .05 for all comparisons). Patients admitted from the CPU had higher rates of the secondary outcome (adjusted hazard ratio 2.26) than patients dismissed from the CPU. Patients admitted after a cardiac stress test in the CPU had higher rates of the secondary outcome (adjusted hazard ratio 2.42) than patients dismissed from the CPU., Conclusions: A CPU does not increase long-term adverse outcomes in patients with chest pain at intermediate risk for an acute event., (Copyright © 2011 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Study Objective: An emergency department (ED) observation unit protocol for the management of acute onset atrial fibrillation is compared with routine hospital admission and management., Methods: Adult patients presenting to the ED with atrial fibrillation of less than 48 hours' duration without hemodynamic instability or other comorbid conditions requiring hospitalization were enrolled. Participants were randomized to either ED observation unit care or routine inpatient care. The ED observation unit protocol included pulse rate control, cardiac monitoring, reassessment, and electrical cardioversion if atrial fibrillation persisted. Patients who reverted to sinus rhythm were discharged with a cardiology follow-up within 3 days, whereas those still in atrial fibrillation were admitted. All cases were followed up for 6 months and adverse events recorded., Results: Of the 153 patients, 75 were randomized to the ED observation unit and 78 to routine inhospital care. Eighty-five percent of ED observation unit patients converted to sinus rhythm versus 73% in the routine care group (difference 12%; 95% confidence interval [CI] -1% to 25%]; P=.06). The median length of stay was 10.1 versus 25.2 hours (difference 15.1 hours; 95% CI 11.2 to 19.6; P<.001) for ED observation unit and inhospital care respectively. Nine ED observation unit patients required inpatient admission. Eleven percent of the ED observation unit group had recurrence of atrial fibrillation during follow-up versus 10% of the routine inpatient care group (difference 1%; 95% CI -9% to 11%; P=.93). There was no significant difference between the groups in the frequency of hospitalization or the number of tests, and the number of adverse events during follow-up was similar in the 2 groups., Conclusion: An ED observation unit protocol that includes electrical cardioversion is a feasible alternative to routine hospital admission for acute onset of atrial fibrillation and results in a shorter initial length of stay.

Background: The goal of our study was to determine the accuracy of the American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) clinical policy in identifying patients with a cardiac cause for their syncope and its potential effect on syncope management., Methods: Adult patients with syncope presenting to the emergency department (ED) from January 1996 to December 1998 were identified. Diagnosis was established retrospectively by reviewing medical records. The ACEP guidelines were applied to this population., Results: Of the 200 patients identified, 115 (57.5%, 95% CI 60-64) were admitted from the ED and 24 (12%) were found to have cardiogenic syncope. Of the 24 patients with cardiac syncope, 23 were admitted. By applying ACEP level B recommendations to our population, all patients who on further workup were found to have cardiac syncope would have been admitted from the ED (100% sensitivity, 95% CI 86-100) and 81% of patients with no cardiac syncope would have been discharged from the ED (81% specificity, 95% CI 75-87). The admission rate would have been 28.5% (95% CI 22-35). By extending admission to patients satisfying level C in addition to level B recommendations, the sensitivity, specificity, and admission rate would have been 100% (95% CI 86-100), 33% (95% CI 26-40), and 71.0% (95% CI 64-77), respectively., Conclusion: High sensitivity and specificity in identifying patients with cardiogenic syncope and significant reduction in the hospital admission rate were observed by applying ACEP level B recommendations to patients presenting to our ED. Application of level C recommendations did not offer any advantage.

Study Objectives: Patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with chest pain after a recent negative inpatient evaluation for cardiac pathology represent a dilemma for the emergency physician. The purposes of this study were to assess the outcome of patients discharged with a diagnosis of chest pain of undetermined origin and to identify predisposing factors for further cardiac events., Methods: The resources of the Rochester Epidemiology Project were used to identify all admitted ED patients with chest pain with suspected acute coronary syndrome who received a discharge diagnosis of chest pain of undetermined origin from 1985 through 1992. Patient records were reviewed for the occurrence of adverse cardiac events and subsequent ED visits for recurrent chest pain within 12 months of discharge. Associations between patient characteristics and an adverse cardiac event were evaluated univariately and summarized by using odds ratios (ORs). Long-term mortality was also determined., Results: Among 1,973 admitted ED patients with chest pain, 230 were given a diagnosis of chest pain of undetermined origin. Ten (4.4%) of 230 patients experienced an adverse cardiac event. Factors significantly associated with an adverse cardiac event included an abnormal ECG on admission (OR 9.5; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.0 to 45.8), preexisting diabetes mellitus (OR 7.1; 95% CI 1.8 to 27.2), and preexisting coronary artery disease (OR 28.4; 95% CI 3.5 to 229.0). Thirty-three (14%) patients returned to the ED within 12 months of discharge; 5 patients were given a diagnosis of a cardiac condition, and 5 were given a diagnosis of a gastrointestinal condition. In long-term follow-up, 46 patients died, with a mean time from hospital discharge to death of any cause of 6.1 years and an estimated 5-year survival of 91.4%., Conclusion: Among patients discharged from the hospital with a diagnosis of chest pain of undetermined origin, those with an initial abnormal ECG, preexisting diabetes, or preexisting coronary artery disease are at higher risk of a subsequent adverse cardiac event. In the absence of such factors, cardiac outcome is excellent.

Study Objectives: Continuous 12-lead serial ECG monitoring has been proposed to assist in the evaluation of patients with acute coronary syndrome and nondiagnostic ECG in an emergency department chest pain unit. However, the ability of serial ECG to detect acute coronary syndrome and its benefit in addition to a standard protocol has not been established. We evaluate the ability of continuous 12-lead ECG to detect acute coronary syndrome, assess the incremental benefit of the serial ECG in association with a set protocol in an ED chest pain unit, and evaluate whether serial ECG changes could be considered as prognostic factors., Methods: Patients who met Agency for Health Care Policy and Research guidelines for intermediate risk for short-term cardiovascular event unstable angina were prospectively studied in the chest pain unit. Patients were monitored with the Mortara Instruments ELI 100 STM continuous 12-lead ECG system with ST-segment analysis. ST-segment changes of greater than 100 microV in 2 or more contiguous leads or greater than 200 microV in 1 lead were considered positive. Data were compared with serial serum cardiac markers, cardiac function study results, angiographic results, and 30-day outcome results., Results: One hundred nineteen patients had serial ECG applied. The median duration of monitoring was 4.2 hours. Forty patients were given a diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome. Chest pain unit protocol detected 52 patients, and 23 were given a diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome (sensitivity 58%; specificity 63%). Sixteen patients had ST-segment changes of greater than 100 microV or greater than 200 microV, and 9 were given a diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome. The addition of the serial ECG to the chest pain unit protocol increased the sensitivity to 65% and decreased the specificity to 58%. Two patients with ST-segment changes but none without ST-segment changes had an adverse cardiac event, yielding a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 88%., Conclusion: Serial ECG is of limited value in the diagnostic evaluation of intermediate-risk patients managed in the chest pain unit with a standard protocol. However, when ST-segment changes are present, they indicate an increased likelihood for an adverse cardiac event.