Search

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to understand the role of implicit racial bias in auditory-perceptual evaluations of dysphonic voices by determining if a biasing effect exists for novice listeners in their auditory-perceptual ratings of Black and White speakers., Method: Thirty speech-language pathology graduate students at Boston University listened to audio files of 20 Black speakers and 20 White speakers of General American English with voice disorders. Listeners rated the overall severity of dysphonia of each voice heard using a 100-unit visual analog scale and completed the Harvard Implicit Association Test (IAT) to measure their implicit racial bias., Results: Both Black and White speakers were rated as less severely dysphonic when their race was labeled as Black. No significant relationship was found between Harvard IAT scores and differences in severity ratings by race labeling condition., Conclusions: These findings suggest a minimizing bias in the evaluation of dysphonia for Black patients with voice disorders. These results contribute to the understanding of how a patient's race may impact their visit with a clinician. Further research is needed to determine the most effective interventions for implicit bias retraining and the additional ways that implicit racial bias impacts comprehensive voice evaluations., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest C.E. Stepp has received consulting fees from Altec, Inc. and Delsys, Inc., companies focused on developing and commercializing technologies related to human movement. Stepp's interests were reviewed and are managed by Boston University in accordance with their conflict of interest policies., (Copyright © 2023 The Voice Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The primary aim of this study was to examine the effect of the videolaryngostroboscopic auditory signal on videolaryngostroboscopy (VLS) ratings and interpretation in normophonic and dysphonic speakers., Study Design: Prospective repeated measures design METHOD: Eight speech-language pathologists evaluated rigid VLS exams obtained from 12 dysphonic speakers with vocal fold pathology and 4 normophonic speakers with normal VLS exams. VLS exams were evaluated with the auditory signal present and absent with a washout period between rating sessions. VLS measures were obtained using the Voice-vibratory Assessment of Laryngeal Imaging (VALI) and a 100mm visual analog scale (VAS). The effects of the auditory signal and its interaction with voice quality severity on 9 VLS ratings, diagnostic billing codes, and treatment recommendations were examined., Results: There was no effect of auditory information on VLS measures or overall severity of laryngeal function evaluated using the VAS (ps > 0.05). There was a main effect of auditory information and a significant interaction with voice quality severity for only one VLS measure (non-vibrating portion-left) evaluated using the VALI (P = 0.05). Post-hoc analysis for this rating showed significant increases (t-test adjusted P < 0.05) when voice quality severity was moderate-severe (M = 4.8%; SD = 1.65%) and auditory information was present. Agreement in individual clinician's selection of diagnostic codes (73%) and treatment recommendations (65.6%) when auditory cues were present and absent was moderate to high., Conclusion: The presence of the videolaryngostroboscopic auditory signal had a minimal effect on VLS ratings, treatment recommendations, or diagnostic billing codes., (Copyright © 2021 The Voice Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective/hypothesis: To determine whether the presence and accuracy of a laryngeal medical diagnosis affects novice listeners' judgments of dysphonia., Study Design: Prospective, within subjects, modified factorial experimental design., Methods: Twenty-six speakers with dysphonia and four normophonic speakers provided speech recordings. Forty novice clinicians evaluated speech samples for roughness and breathiness using 100-mm visual analog scales in two conditions. First, speech samples were presented without diagnostic information. In the second condition, 50% of the speech samples were presented with the accurate laryngeal medical diagnosis, while the other 50% of samples were presented with an inaccurate (alternative) diagnosis., Results: Results showed that judgments of dysphonia were affected by the presence of both accurate and inaccurate diagnoses. As expected, when compared to no known diagnosis, judgments of roughness significantly increased in severity when an accurate diagnostic label of vocal fold lesions was presented. Likewise, in comparison to no known diagnosis, judgments of breathiness trended toward an increase in severity when an accurate diagnostic label of vocal fold paralysis/paresis was presented. Interestingly, increases in perceived severity of dysphonia were also observed with the presentation of inaccurate diagnoses, with the overall effect of inaccurate diagnostic information being greater than accurate diagnoses. Specifically, increases in perceived roughness and breathiness were observed when inaccurate diagnoses included benign vocal fold lesion(s) and vocal fold paralysis/paresis. In contrast, inaccurate diagnostic labels indicating "clear larynx" or diagnoses other than benign vocal fold lesion(s) or paralysis/paresis resulted in decreased perceived roughness and breathiness severity. The magnitude of the differences in perceived severity between conditions was overall reduced for breathiness compared to roughness., Conclusions: Sources of bias such as knowledge and accuracy of medical diagnoses should be considered when novice clinicians use auditory-perceptual measures to evaluate dysphonia and measure treatment outcomes., (Copyright © 2018 The Voice Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The purposes of this study were to (1) determine and compare the diagnostic accuracy of a single acoustic measure, smoothed cepstral peak prominence (CPPS), to predict voice disorder status from connected speech samples using two software systems: Analysis of Dysphonia in Speech and Voice (ADSV) and Praat; and (2) to determine the relationship between measures of CPPS generated from these programs., Study Design: This is a retrospective cross-sectional study., Methods: Measures of CPPS were obtained from connected speech recordings of 100 subjects with voice disorders and 70 nondysphonic subjects without vocal complaints using commercially available ADSV and freely downloadable Praat software programs. Logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were used to evaluate and compare the diagnostic accuracy of CPPS measures. Relationships between CPPS measures from the programs were determined., Results: Results showed acceptable overall accuracy rates (75% accuracy, ADSV; 82% accuracy, Praat) and area under the ROC curves (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.81, ADSV; AUC = 0.91, Praat) for predicting voice disorder status, with slight differences in sensitivity and specificity. CPPS measures derived from Praat were uniquely predictive of disorder status above and beyond CPPS measures from ADSV (χ 2 (1) = 40.71, P < 0.001). CPPS measures from both programs were significantly and highly correlated (r = 0.88, P < 0.001)., Conclusions: A single acoustic measure of CPPS was highly predictive of voice disorder status using either program. Clinicians may consider using CPPS to complement clinical voice evaluation and screening protocols., (Copyright © 2017 The Voice Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Spasmodic dysphonia (SD) is a chronic, incurable, and often disabling voice disorder of unknown pathogenesis. The purpose of this study was to identify possible endogenous and exogenous risk and protective factors uniquely associated with SD., Study Design: Prospective, exploratory, case-control investigation., Methods: One hundred fifty patients with SD and 150 medical controls (MCs) were interviewed regarding their personal and family histories, environmental exposures, illnesses, injuries, voice use patterns, and general health using a previously vetted and validated epidemiologic questionnaire., Results: Odds ratios and multiple logistic regression analyses (α<0.15) identified several factors that significantly increased the likelihood of having SD. These factors included (1) a personal history of mumps, blepharospasm, tremor, intense occupational and avocational voice use, and a family history of voice disorders; (2) an immediate family history of meningitis, tremor, tics, cancer, and compulsive behaviors; and (3) an extended family history of tremor and cancer., Conclusions: SD is likely multifactorial in etiology, involving both genetic and environmental factors. Viral infections/exposures, along with intense voice use, may trigger the onset of SD in genetically predisposed individuals. Future studies should examine the interaction among genetic and environmental factors to determine the pathogenesis of SD., (Copyright © 2011 The Voice Foundation. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.)

This case study examined case histories, diagnostic features, and treatment response in two 79-year-old male monozygotic (identical) twins with vocal fold bowing, exploring both genetic and environmental factors. DNA concordance was examined via cheek swab. Case histories, videostroboscopy, auditory- and visual-perceptual assessment, electromyography, acoustic measures, and Voice Handicap ratings were undertaken. Both twins underwent surgical intervention and subsequent voice therapy. Monozygosity was confirmed for DNA polymorphisms, with 10 of 10 concordance for STR DNA markers. For both twins, auditory- and visual-perceptual assessments indicated severe bowing, hoarseness, and breathiness, although Twin 1 was judged to be extremely severe. Differences in reference to root-mean-square amplitudes were observed for thyroarytenoid and lateral cricoarytenoid muscles, with smaller relative amplitudes observed for the Twin 1 versus Twin 2. No consistent voice improvement was observed after surgical intervention(s), despite improved mid-membranous vocal fold closure. Marked reductions in Voice Handicap Index total scores were observed after behavioral voice therapy, coinciding with increased mid-membranous and posterior laryngeal (interarytenoid) glottal closure. No substantive differences in acoustic measures were observed. Vocal fold bowing was more severe for Twin 1 versus Twin 2 despite identical heritability factors. Overall voice improvement with treatment was greater for Twin 2 than Twin 1. Environmental factors might partially account for the differences observed between the twins, including variability in their responsiveness to behavioral voice therapy. Voice therapy was useful in improving mid-membranous and posterior laryngeal closure, although dysphonia remained severe in both cases., (Copyright (c) 2010 The Voice Foundation. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.)