1. Motivations for and against Participation in Neonatal Research: Insights from Interviews of Diverse Parents Approached for Neonatal Research in the United States.
- Author
-
Weiss EM, Donohue PK, Wootton SH, Stevens E, Merhar SL, Puia-Dumitrescu M, Mercer A, Oslin E, Porter KM, and Wilfond BS
- Subjects
- Humans, Female, United States, Male, Infant, Newborn, Adult, Altruism, Biomedical Research, Interviews as Topic, Motivation, Parents psychology
- Abstract
Objective: To describe parents' motivations for and against participation in neonatal research, including the views of those who declined participation., Study Design: We performed 44 semi-structured, qualitative interviews of parents approached for neonatal research. Here we describe their motivations for and against participation., Results: Altruism was an important reason parents chose to participate. Some hoped participation in research would benefit their infant. Burdens of participation to the family, such as transportation to follow up (distinct from risks/burdens to the infant), were often deciding factors among those who declined participation. Perceived risks to the infant were reasons against participation, but parents often did not differentiate between baseline risks and incremental risk of study participation. Concerns regarding their infant being treated like a "guinea pig" were common among those who declined. Finally, historical abuses and institutional racism were reported as important concerns by some research decliners from minoritized populations., Conclusions: Within a diverse sample of parents approached to enroll their infant in neonatal research, motivations for and against participation emerged, which may be targets of future interventions. These motivations included reasons for participation which we may hope to encourage, such as altruism. They also included reasons against participation, which we may hope to, as feasible, eliminate, mitigate, or at least acknowledge. These findings can help clinical trialists, regulators, and funders attempting to improve neonatal research recruitment processes., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Conflicts of interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest relevant to this article to disclose. Funding/Support: This study was supported by National Institutes of Health through the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (K23HD103872, supporting Elliott Weiss). Additional support was provided by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health (UL1 TR00231, supporting Benjamin Wilfond and Kathryn Porter). Role of Funder/Sponsor: The NIH had no role in the design and conduct of this study., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF