Search

Objective: To study the impact of nonpharmaceutical interventions implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic on the monthly incidence of sudden unexpected death in infancy (SUDI) cases overall and those with a viral or bacterial identification., Study Design: We conducted an interrupted time-series analysis using seasonally adjusted Poisson regression models from the French national prospective and multicenter SUDI registry, that included all SUDI cases below the age of 1 year who died from 2016 to 2021 in mainland France., Results: Of 998 SUDI cases analyzed, 750 were recorded during the prepandemic period (January 2016 through March 2020) and 248 during the NPI period (April 2020 through December 2021). We found a significant seasonal pattern of overall monthly SUDI incidence, with a peak observed periodically from November to February. The monthly SUDI incidence decreased significantly from the prepandemic to NPI periods (adjusted incidence rate ratio 0.83 [95% CI 0.72-0.96]). In particular, the monthly incidence of SUDI cases with a viral or bacterial identification decreased significantly, while no significant difference was found for SUDI cases without a viral or bacterial identification., Conclusions: Nonpharmaceutical interventions were associated with a significant change in the incidence of SUDI cases with a viral or bacterial identification. Further investigations are needed to analyze the pathophysiologic role of viruses and bacteria in the SUDI., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The French SUDI registry receives main funding from AXA, France; MSDAvenir, France; Sanofi Pasteur-MSD, France; the French national public health agency (Santé Publique France), France; the National Institute of Health and Medical Research (Inserm), France; and 3 French parent associations (SA VIE, Naitre et Vivre, and Les Rires d'Anna); it also received gifts from private organizations and companies. This particular work was supported by the Fondation de France (Alliance “Tous unis contre le virus”, grant n°APHP220322). Funders were not involved in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data, in the writing of the report, or in the decision to submit the paper for publication. No support from any organization for the submitted work, no financial relationships with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work, and no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To describe pre-COVID-19 pandemic current practices in virological investigations, including type, frequency of samplings, and documented viruses, in sudden unexpected death in infancy (SUDI) and to compare results according to the cause of death., Study Design: Between May 2015 and December 2019, infants under 2 years of age included in the French SUDI registry were classified in one of 4 groups by causes of death according to the classification by Goldstein et al. : unexplained (SIDS), infectious, explained but noninfectious, and undetermined. Sampling sites and viruses detected were described, and then SIDS and explained deaths (control group) were compared., Results: Among 639 infants, 3.6% died of an established viral infection. From 23 sampling sites and 2238 samples, 19 virus species were detected. Overall, 43.3% of infants carried a virus, with no significant difference between SIDS infants and the control group (P = .06). We found wide variations in frequencies of samples by site (550 for nasopharynx to one for saliva). The highest positivity rate was from the nasopharynx (195/2238; 8.7%). Rhinovirus was the predominant virus detected (135/504; 26.8%), mostly in SIDS (83/254; 32.7%). We found no significant difference between positivity rates and distribution of viruses between the SIDS and control groups. At-autopsy virological analysis never contributed to determining the cause of death., Conclusion: Current practices in virological investigations in SUDI are heterogeneous, with wide variability despite published guidelines. Investigations should be limited to the most relevant sites, and systematic at-autopsy sampling should be reconsidered. We found no association between virus detection and SIDS., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To study recent epidemiologic trends of sudden unexpected death in infancy (SUDI) in Western Europe., Study Design: Annual national statistics of death causes for 14 Western European countries from 2005 to 2015 were analyzed. SUDI cases were defined as infants younger than 1 year with the underlying cause of death classified as "sudden infant death syndrome," "unknown/unattended/unspecified cause," or "accidental threats to breathing." Poisson regression models were used to study temporal trends of SUDI rates and source of variation., Results: From 2005 to 2015, SUDI accounted for 15 617 deaths, for an SUDI rate of 34.9 per 100 000 live births. SUDI was the second most common cause of death after the neonatal period (22.2%) except in Belgium, Finland, France, and the UK, where it ranked first. The overall SUDI rate significantly decreased from 40.2 to 29.9 per 100 000, with a significant rate reduction experienced for 6 countries, no significant evolution for 7 countries, and a significant increase for Denmark. The sudden infant death syndrome/SUDI ratio was 56.7%, with a significant decrease from 64.9% to 49.7% during the study period, and ranged from 6.1% in Portugal to 97.8% in Ireland. We observed between-country variations in SUDI and sudden infant death syndrome sex ratios., Conclusions: In studied countries, SUDI decreased during the study period but remained a major cause of infant deaths, with marked between-country variations in rates, trends, and components. Standardization is needed to allow for comparing data to improve the implementation of risk-reduction strategies., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)