Search

Context: Streptococcus pyogenes has recently re-emerged as a significant pathogen causing disease ranging from pharyngitis to lethal systemic infection. Six hospital pharmacy employees were diagnosed as having streptococcal pharyngitis during 1 week, and antibiotic prophylaxis was requested to halt the outbreak., Objective: Outbreak investigation., Design: Review of initial cases and prospective evaluation of the remaining pharmacy employees and the antigen detection test being used., Setting: Pharmacy and occupational health department of a university hospital., Population: Sixteen employees of the hospital pharmacy and 19 other employees of the hospital., Results: The 6 pharmacy employees who had positive streptococcal antigen detection tests did not have symptoms suggesting streptococcal pharyngitis. Of the 10 remaining pharmacy employees, none had a positive throat culture for S pyogenes. Specificity of the antigen detection test being used was 53% (95% CI, 30%-75%) in prospective evaluation., Conclusions: This was believed to represent a pseudoepidemic because none of the 6 cases had signs or symptoms typical of streptococcal pharyngitis, none of the remaining 10 pharmacy employees had positive throat cultures, and prospective evaluation found low specificity of the antigen detection test. Whereas use of an accurate test in such a low prevalence setting could have resulted in a higher percentage of results being false-positive, the low specificity of the antigen detection test being used also contributed to the pseudoepidemic.

Objective: The objective of the study was to improve health care workers' compliance with hand hygiene after patient contact by use of an alcohol-based hand antiseptic., Design and Methods: Six commercially available alcohol-based hand antiseptics were evaluated. The one most pleasing to the evaluators' hands was selected for the study. Baseline handwashing rates were assessed on 2 medical wards. Alcohol dispensers were mounted by every door on the 2 wards. An educational campaign was conducted with 4 weekly visits to these floors to remind and reinstruct staff about the use of the alcohol dispensers and to address questions. After 2 months handwashing rates were reassessed., Setting: The study was set in a university hospital., Results: The baseline handwashing rate was 60% (76/126). Physicians were most compliant (83%), followed by nurses (60%), technologists (56%), and housekeepers (36%). Two months later overall hand hygiene rates had decreased to 52% (P = .26). Nurses were most compliant (67%), followed by technologists (57%), physicians (29%), and housekeepers (25%). Physician compliance was associated with compliance by attending physicians whose example was usually followed by all other physicians on rounds., Conclusions: A brief educational campaign and installation of dispensers containing a rapidly acting hand hygiene product near hospital rooms did not affect hand hygiene compliance. The behavior of attending physicians was predictive of handwashing rates for all others in the attending's retinue. Compliance with handwashing after half of all patient contacts was a result of perfect compliance by some and total noncompliance by others being observed.

The scientific basis for claims of efficacy of nosocomial infection surveillance and control programs was established by the Study on the Efficacy of Nosocomial Infection Control project. Subsequent analyses have demonstrated nosocomial infection prevention and control programs to be not only clinically effective but also cost-effective. Although governmental and professional organizations have developed a wide variety of useful recommendations and guidelines for infection control, and apart from general guidance provided by the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations, there are surprisingly few recommendations on infrastructure and essential activities for infection control and epidemiology programs. In April 1996, the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America established a consensus panel to develop recommendations for optimal infrastructure and essential activities of infection control and epidemiology programs in hospitals. The following report represents the consensus panel's best assessment of needs for a healthy and effective hospital-based infection control and epidemiology program. The recommendations fall into eight categories: managing critical data and information; setting and recommending policies and procedures; compliance with regulations, guidelines, and accreditation requirements; employee health; direct intervention to prevent transmission of infectious diseases; education and training of healthcare workers; personnel resources; and nonpersonnel resources. The consensus panel used an evidence-based approach and categorized recommendations according to modifications of the scheme developed by the Clinical Affairs Committee of the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee.

Background: The incidence of nosocomial bloodstream infections has increased twofold to threefold in the past decade, and central venous catheter infections account for about 90% of catheter-related nosocomial bloodstream infections. Many studies of risk factors for central venous catheter complications have been conducted, resulting in recommendations for preventive strategies, but few data are available regarding the frequency with which such strategies are employed in clinical practice., Methods: A survey was conducted of persons attending a meeting of the National Association of Vascular Access Networks in New Orleans on September 25, 1992. The survey contained 15 questions related to central venous catheters regarding infection control measures, measures to maintain patency, and use of the catheter for obtaining blood specimens for diagnostic tests., Results: Ninety-two persons from 24 states completed the questionnaire as representatives of 23 teaching hospitals, 21 nonteaching hospitals, and 48 home health agencies. Transparent dressings were used more frequently (88%) than cotton gauze (27%). Alcohol and povidone-iodine solutions were the most frequently used antiseptics. Antimicrobial ointment was used by fewer than half; of these 86% used povidone-iodine and 26% used polymyxin-neomycin-bacitracin. Heparin flushes were still being used by 97% to maintain patency. Most (82%) used central venous catheters to draw blood cultures; of these, 68% drew only qualitative cultures and 32% drew quantitative cultures in addition to or instead of qualitative cultures., Conclusions: Significant diversity of practice was documented among the health care organizations represented in this survey. Some of the practices documented in this survey have been associated with higher rates of bloodstream infection; this may partially explain the observed increase during the past decade in the incidence of nosocomial bloodstream infections.

Background: In 1990, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommended substituting dust-mist particulate respirators for simple isolation masks in acid-fast bacillus isolation rooms, reasoning that air leaks around the simple masks could result in a higher rate of purified protein derivative skin-test conversion. In 1993, a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention draft guideline proposed that high-efficiency particulate air filter respirators be used instead of dust-mist particulate respirators. Epidemiologic data were not available to assess the importance of these changes or their cost-effectiveness., Methods: The University of Virginia was affiliated with a tuberculosis hospital from 1979 until 1987. We surveyed physicians who had served as residents in internal medicine during this period regarding purified protein derivative skin-test history. duration of work at the tuberculosis sanatorium, and any history of unprotected exposures to patients with active pulmonary or laryngeal tuberculosis. Patients with active tuberculosis at the sanatorium were isolated in negative-pressure rooms with UV lights. Physicians wore simple isolation masks in these rooms., Results: Responses were received from 83 former resident physicians. Fifty-two physicians had worked on the tuberculosis wards for a total of 420 weeks, with no subsequent skin-test conversions (95% CI 0 to 1 conversion/8 physician-years)., Conclusions: These data document a low risk of occupational transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis to physicians who wear simple isolation masks in negative-pressure ventilation rooms with UV lights. This low rate predicts that the additional protective efficacy and cost-effectiveness of the more expensive high-efficiency particulate air filter respirators and the respiratory protection program will be low.

In a longitudinal study to determine the seroprevalence of antibody to the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and the natural history of a positive enzyme immunoassay (EIA) result we followed a cohort of 98 patients receiving long-term dialysis. Eight patients (8.2%) in the cohort had a positive EIA and a negative Western blot test result. The EIA-positive results of all patients seroconverted to negative during follow-up. No illness suggestive of HIV infection developed in any of the patients. Significantly associated with a false positive EIA were prior renal transplantation, transfusions during the months just before the positive EIA result, and a greater number of lifetime transfusions before the positive test result. We confirm that routine HIV screening of patients receiving long-term dialysis is associated with a high rate of false positive EIA results and conclude that such testing is unnecessary in the absence of established risk factors for HIV infection.

A survey of discharged patients revealed that 62% of respondents were aware of the risk of nosocomial infection before they received the survey. Of the respondents 12.4% said they had suffered from a nosocomial infection; 70% were concerned about their risk of acquiring a nosocomial infection in the future; 83% believed nosocomial infections were preventable; 69% said the risk of acquiring a nosocomial infection was never explained to them during hospitalization; and 62% were dissatisfied with the information that hospitals and the medical community provided concerning the risk of nosocomial infections. Fifty-seven percent were willing to pay an extra $7.14 mean per diem charge to enhance the hospital's infection control program if this payment would lower their risk of infection. This survey suggests that the subset of responding patients want to know more about the risk of nosocomial infections, and they are willing to pay for more resources to be channeled into effective infection control programs.