Search

Background: Combined hepatocholangiocarcinoma is a rare cancer with a grim prognosis composed of both hepatocellular carcinoma and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma morphologic patterns in the same tumor. The aim of this multicenter, international cohort study was to compare the oncologic outcomes after surgery of combined hepatocholangiocarcinoma to hepatocellular carcinoma and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma., Methods: Patients treated by surgery for combined hepatocholangiocarcinoma, hepatocellular carcinoma, and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma from 2000 to 2021 from multicenter international databases were analyzed retrospectively. Patients with combined hepatocholangiocarcinoma (cases) were compared with 2 control groups of hepatocellular carcinoma or intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, sequentially matched using a propensity score based on 8 preoperative characteristics. Overall and disease-free survival were compared, and predictors of mortality and recurrence were analyzed with Cox regression after propensity score matching., Results: During the study period, 3,196 patients were included. Propensity score adjustment and 2 sequential matching processes produced a new cohort (n = 244) comprising 3 balanced groups was obtained (combined hepatocholangiocarcinoma = 56, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma = 66, and hepatocellular carcinoma = 122). Kaplan-Meier overall survival estimations at 1, 3, and 5 years were 67%, 45%, and 28% for combined hepatocholangiocarcinoma, 92%, 75%, and 55% for hepatocellular carcinoma, and 86%, 53%, and 42% for the intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma group, respectively (P = .0014). Estimations of disease-free survival at 1, 3, and 5 years were 51%, 25%, and 17% for combined hepatocholangiocarcinoma, 63%, 35%, and 26% for the hepatocellular carcinoma group, and 51%, 31%, and 28% for the intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma group, respectively (P = .19). Predictors of mortality were combined hepatocholangiocarcinoma subtype, metabolic syndrome, preoperative tumor markers alpha-fetoprotein and carbohydrate antigen 19-9, and satellite nodules, and recurrence was associated with satellite nodules rather than cancer subtype., Conclusion: Despite data limitations, overall survival among patients with combined hepatocholangiocarcinoma was worse than both groups and closer intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, whereas disease-free survival was similar among the 3 groups. Future research on immunophenotypic profiling may hold more promise than traditional nonmodifiable clinical characteristics (as found in this study) in predicting recurrence or response to salvage treatments., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: This study aimed to quantify the learning curve of piggyback liver transplantation and to identify factors that impact the operative time and blood transfusion during the learning curve., Methods: A retrospective review was performed on consecutive cases of patients' first piggyback liver transplantations that were performed by a single surgeon. The learning curve for the operative time was evaluated using the cumulative sum method., Results: There were 181, consecutive, first-time piggyback liver transplantations. The median operative time was 345 minutes (range: 180-745 minutes) with a median transfusion rate of 4 packed red blood cell units (range: 0-23 units). The cumulative sum learning curve identified 3 phases: an initial phase (1-70 piggyback liver transplantations), a plateau phase (71-101 piggyback liver transplantations), and a stable phase (102-181 piggyback liver transplantations). Over the 3 phases, there were significant decreases in the median duration of the surgery (388.8 vs 344.8 vs 326.9 minutes; P = .004, P = .0004, P ≤ .0001) and the number of red blood cell units transfused (6.00 vs 3.90 vs 3.71; P = .02, P = .79, P = .0006). Multivariable analysis identified that the following factors impacted the operative time: surgeon experience (P = .00006), previous upper abdominal surgery (P = .01), portocaval shunt fashioning (P = .0003), early portal section (P = .00001), multiple arterial graft reconstruction (P = .03), and the length of the retrohepatic inferior vena covered by segment 1 (P = .0006). Independent risk factors for increased blood loss were surgeon experience (P = .0001), previous upper abdominal surgery (P = .002), the retrohepatic inferior vena cava encirclement by segment 1 (P = .0001), severe portal hypertension (P = .01), early portal section (P = .001), and low prothrombin time (P = .00001)., Conclusion: Easily identifiable factors related to recipients (segment 1 morphology, previous upper abdominal surgery, severe portal hypertension) and to surgeon (operative experience, portocaval shunt fashioning, early portal section, and multiple arterial reconstructions) impact operative time and blood loss during the learning curve of piggyback liver transplantation. These factors can be used for grading the difficulties of liver transplantation to tailor the surgical strategy., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The impact of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt misplacement on outcomes of liver transplantation remains controversial. We systematically reviewed the literature on the outcomes of liver transplantation with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt misplacement., Methods: This systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The Cochrane library, PubMed, and Embase were searched (January 1990-April 2020) for studies reporting patients undergoing liver transplantation with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt misplacement., Results: Thirty-six studies reporting 181 patients who underwent liver transplantation with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt misplacement were identified. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt was misplaced with a variable degree of extension toward the inferior vena cava/right heart in 63 patients (34%), the spleno/portal/superior mesenteric venous confluence in 105 patients (58%), and both in 15 patients (8%). Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt thrombosis was also present in 21 cases (12%). The median interval between transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt placement and liver transplantation ranged from 1 day to 6 years. Complete transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt removal was successfully performed in all but 12 (7%) patients in whom part of the transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt was left in situ. Cardiac surgery under cardiopulmonary bypass was necessary to remove transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt from the right heart in 4 patients (2%), and a venous graft interposition was necessary for a portal anastomosis in 5 patients (3%). Postoperative mortality (90 days) was 1.1% (2 patients), and portal vein thrombosis developed postoperatively in 4 patients (2%)., Conclusion: Misplaced transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt removal is possible in most cases during liver transplantation with extremely low mortality and good postoperative outcomes. Preoperative surgical strategy and intraoperative tailored surgical technique reduces the potential consequences of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt misplacement., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Temporary portocaval shunt has a positive impact on short-term outcomes after liver transplantation. An alternative to temporary portocaval shunt is a distal passive decompression through mesenterico-saphenous shunt. The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes of these two types of surgical portosystemic shunt and discuss their respective place during the anhepatic phase., Methods: Patients transplanted with portal decompression during a 4-year period were included. Patients were compared according to two types of surgical decompression techniques: temporary portocaval shunt (n = 44) and mesenterico-saphenous shunt (n = 77). Spontaneous >5-mm portosystemic shunts were described as absent, nonpersistent, distal, or proximal. Intraoperative portal pressure variations and inhospital course were compared between the two groups, with special attention on the impact of competing spontaneous and surgical shunts., Results: Mesenterico-saphenous shunt and temporary portocaval shunt showed a comparable hemodynamic efficiency, with no significant difference in terms of portal pressure variations. We found no significant difference in terms of reperfusion syndrome (P = .956), transfusion rate (P = .575), renal failure (P = .239) nor early allograft dysfunction (P = .976). There was a significantly higher risk of early allograft dysfunction when competing surgical and spontaneous shunts were used (P = .002) with a lesser hemodynamic efficiency (analysis of variance test; P = .04)., Conclusion: Portacaval or mesenterico-saphenous shunts offer similar hemodynamic efficiency without impacting the outcomes after liver transplantation. Their respective place and the place of portal decompression should be discussed regarding the presence of portal thrombosis and pre-existing portosystemic shunts. Evaluation of the anatomy and the efficiency of these shunts may guide tailored portal decompression., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Incomplete evaluation of venous invasion has led to conflicting results regarding the prognosis of patients undergoing pancreatectomy with a synchronous venous resection. This study evaluates the prognostic value associated with the presence and the depth of venous invasion in T3 pancreatic adenocarcinoma., Methods: This study evaluated retrospectively 181 consecutive pancreatoduodenectomies performed for T3N0M0 and T3N1M0 pancreatic adenocarcinomas (stages IIA and IIB) from January 2006 to December 2014. Univariate and multivariate Cox analyses were performed to assess survival prognostic factors., Results: Pancreatoduodenectomies with a segmental venous resection was performed on 91 patients, while 90 other patients had a standard pancreatoduodenectomies without venous resection. Pathologic venous invasion was detected in 68 (74%) of the 91 venous resection patients. Depth of venous invasion was into the adventitia (n = 25), media (n = 28), and intima (n = 15). The overall survival rates at 1, 3, 5, and 10 years were 75%, 33%, 21%, and 6%, respectively. There were no differences in survival between patients undergoing standard pancreatoduodenectomies and pancreatoduodenectomies with venous resection (27 vs 22 months; P = .28) or between patients with and without venous invasion (20 vs 27 months; P = .08). In multivariate analysis, depth of venous invasion into the intima (hazard ratio, 2.25; 95% confidence interval, 1.16-4.34; P = .0001) and adjuvant chemotherapy (hazard ratio, 0.16; 95% confidence interval, 0.09-0.43; P ≤ .0001) were identified as independent prognostic factors of overall survival., Conclusion: Depth of venous invasion into the intima indicates poor survival in pancreatic T3 adenocarcinoma. Preoperative identification of this factor could be helpful for better selection of patients for curative operation., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Parenchyma-sparing pancreatectomies, especially enucleations, could avoid disappointing functional results associated with standard resections for benign/low-grade pancreatic neoplasms. This study aimed to assess short- and long-term outcomes in a large, single-center series of enucleations., Methods: All 126 patients who underwent enucleation for benign/low-grade neoplasms between 1996 and 2011 were included retrospectively., Results: Lesions were mainly incidentally diagnosed (71%), most often located in the head (46%), and with a median size of 20 mm. Enucleations were mainly performed for branch-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (30%), nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (29%), and mucinous cystadenoma (21%). Overall mortality was 0.8% and morbidity 63%, mainly owing to pancreatic fistula (57%). Most were significant clinically, that is, grade B or C (41%), but managed conservatively (85%). Reoperation rate was 3%, mainly owing to hemorrhage. Postoperative de novo diabetes was 0.8%, and exocrine insufficiency never observed. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year recurrence-free survival were 100%, 98%, and 93%, respectively., Conclusion: Enucleation is associated with substantial morbidity, especially pancreatic fistula. Enucleations as an alternative to standard resection are best indicated for small, benign, and low-grade lesions located far from the main pancreatic duct. Enucleations should be proposed to young and fit patients able to tolerate postoperative morbidity and who could benefit from the excellent long-term results., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Bilobar colorectal metastases may be treated by a 2-stage surgical strategy. The risk of drop out after the first stage hepatectomy remains high and is associated with a nearly zero survival rate at 3 years. Our goal was to evaluate the factors predictive of the feasibility of the strategy and long-term survival, based on simple clinical and histologic features obtained from the first stage specimen., Patients and Methods: Patients who underwent a first stage hepatectomy with curative intent were included. Preoperative clinical parameters and histologic features of the primary neoplasm and metastases obtained at the first stage hepatectomy were analyzed and compared between patients who did or did not undergo the second stage operation. A group of comparable patients treated only by chemotherapy was used as a control group., Results: The feasibility rate of this 2-stage resection was 76% (38/50 patients). Median survival was greater in patients treated with chemotherapy alone than for those who failed the second stage. A clinicopathologic score including male sex, segment 1 metastasis, need for >3 resection(s)/radiofrequency ablation(s), vascular invasion in the primary, need for change in type of chemotherapy, and microscopic biliary invasion by the metastasis was predictive of feasibility of the second stage and disease-free survival in patients achieving the second stage., Conclusion: Combining preoperative clinical parameters with pathologic features of the primary and the metastatic lesions obtained during first stage hepatectomy predicted accurately patients who failed the second stage, and the long-term outcomes. Considering both clinical and pathologic parameters may help to define the best oncologic strategy by choosing between an exclusive chemotherapeutic or a surgical strategy., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)