Search

Background: In patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis, preoperative diagnosis of common bile duct (CBD) stones can modify the therapeutic strategy. The aims of this prospective, controlled multicenter study were to assess the feasibility, concordance, discordance, and indexes such as sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy of preoperative endoscopic ultrasonography compared with those of intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) in the diagnosis of asymptomatic CBD stones (i.e., patients undergoing cholecystectomy with no clinical or biologic evidence of CBD stones)., Methods: From October 1993 to October 1995, 240 consecutive patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis, scheduled for cholecystectomy in 14 surgical centers, were enrolled in this study. All patients were selected for this study according to a preoperative high-risk CBD stone predictive score. Each patient underwent both endoscopic ultrasonography and IOC, as well as surgical exploration of the CBD when stones were detected during one or both preoperative investigations. All patients were seen 1 months and 1 year after operation to check for residual stones., Results: The feasibility of endoscopic ultrasonography was significantly higher overall than that of IOC (99% vs 90%; p < 0.001), except when IOC was through a laparotomy (97% vs 93%; p = 0.16). The number of patients available for study was 215. In 198 cases (92%), results of both investigations were in concordance (161 negative and 37 positive values). Seventeen cases (8%) were discordant. There was overall concordance between the two investigations (kappa coefficient 0.764; 95% confidence interval 0.66 to 0.87), but the percentage of discordance was in favor of IOC. Sensitivity and specificity of IOC were significantly higher than those of endoscopic ultrasonography (1.00 and 0.98 vs 0.85 and 0.93, respectively). With a prevalence of CBD stones of 19%, positive and negative predictive values of IOC were significantly higher than those of endoscopic ultrasonography (0.93 and 1.00 vs 0.75 and 0.96, respectively)., Conclusions: Although endoscopic ultrasonography is feasible more often than IOC, IOC is associated with a slightly lower degree of discordance and better information indexes and remains an efficient method of investigation for CBD stones. Endoscopic ultrasonography can be suggested in preference to endoscopic retrograde cholangiography when postoperative residual stones are suspected but need not be performed routinely before cholecystectomy.

Background: Although used widely for supraperitoneal anastomoses, circular stapled anastomoses have never been proved better than hand-sewn anastomoses. In the one prospective controlled trial that studied these anastomoses specifically, the only significant difference found was that there were more clinically obvious leakages with the circular stapled variety, but not in the overall clinical and roentgenologic leakage rates., Methods: One hundred fifty-nine consecutive patients (88 men and 71 women, mean age 65.8 +/- 12.1 years) were randomized to undergo hand-sewn (n = 74) or circular stapled (n = 85) supraperitoneal colorectal anastomosis after left colectomy., Results: Patient demographics were similar in both groups. Overall mortality was 1.3% (2 of 159; one in each group). No statistically significant difference (NS) was found in the rate of early complications, including anastomotic leakage (4 of 74 versus 6 of 85) in the hand-sewn and stapled anastomoses, respectively). Mishaps (n = 10) and hemorrhage (n = 5) occurred in the stapled group only. Stapled anastomoses took an average of 8 minutes less to perform (p < 0.001), but this time gain did not significantly influence the overall duration of operation (identical median times). The median duration of hospitalization was 13 and 14 days, respectively (NS). At 8 months there were 2 of 74 strictures in the hand-sewn group and 4 of 85 strictures in the stapled group (NS)., Conclusions: According to these results, there seems to be no advantage of routine or regular use of stapling instruments for supraperitoneal colorectal anastomosis.

Background: Disagreement continues among several studies as to the relative advantages and disadvantages of stapled versus sutured colorectal anastomoses., Methods: One hundred and thirteen consecutive patients (48 men and 65 women, mean age: 67 +/- 12 years) were randomized to either hand-sewn (n = 59) or stapled (n = 54) infraperitoneal colorectal anastomosis. Both groups had similar patient demographics except that fewer patients (4 versus 15) had chronic disease (p < 0.02) and were undergoing side-to-end (11 versus 39) and more patients were undergoing end-to-end (37 versus 20) anastomosis in the stapled group (p < 0.001)., Results: Overall mortality was 6% (7 of 113 patients), with no difference found between the two types of anastomosis. Fewer anastomotic leaks occurred in the stapled group (11 versus 7), with an a posteriori gamma error of 11%, whereas the other early postoperative complications occurred with similar frequency in the two groups. Nine mishaps occurred in the stapled group. Stapled anastomoses took less time (median, 42 versus 30 minutes) to perform (p < 0.02). At 8 months, two strictures occurred in the hand-sewn group (n = 52) compared with eight strictures in the stapled group (n = 50) (p < 0.001)., Conclusions: It was not possible to prove that lower anastomosis can be achieved with the stapling device. Routine or regular use of stapling instruments for infraperitoneal colorectal anastomosis cannot be advocated because of higher incidence of mishaps and strictures, even though the operation takes less time to perform and anastomotic leakage occurs less often.

A bilioportal fistula is rare. We report the case of a patient who had a bilioportal fistula 6 years after a choledochoduodenostomy. Percutaneous transhepatic opacification showed the bilioportal fistula to be associated with a thrombosed portal vein and a cavernous formation. Treatment consisted of separate percutaneous drainage of the portal and biliary tracts. Closure of the fistula was obtained by progressive proximal intrahepatic portal thrombosis. Our case contrasts with the four other cases of bilioportal fistula published in the literature in that (1) there was an absence of biliary lithiasis and (2) we did not use surgical treatment. The most likely explanation for our case of bilioportal fistula is an infectious complication related to the choledochoduodenostomy.