Search

Objective: To compare disease severity and mortality differences between female and male patients with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH)., Study Design: We queried the CDH Study Group (CDHSG) database for CDH neonates managed between 2007 and 2018. Female and males were compared in statistical analyses using t tests, χ² tests, and Cox regression, as appropriate (P ≤ .05)., Results: There were 7288 CDH patients, of which 3048 (41.8%) were female. Females weighed less on average at birth than males (2.84 kg vs 2.97 kg, P < .001) despite comparable gestational age. Females had similar rates of extracorporeal life support (ECLS) utilization (27.8% vs 27.3%, P = .65). Although both cohorts had equivalent defect size and rates of patch repair, female patients had increased rates of intrathoracic liver herniation (49.2% vs 45.9%, P = .01) and pulmonary hypertension (PH) (86.6% vs 81.1%, P < .001). Females had lower survival rates at 30-days (77.3% vs 80.1%, P = .003) and overall lower survival to discharge (70.2% vs 74.2%, P < .001). Subgroup analysis revealed that increased mortality was significant among those who underwent repair but were never supported on ECLS (P = .005). On Cox regression analysis, female sex was independently associated with mortality (adjusted hazard ratio 1.32, P = .02)., Conclusion: After controlling for the established prenatal and postnatal predictors of mortality, female sex remains independently associated with a higher risk of mortality in CDH. Further study into the underlying causes for sex-specific disparities in CDH outcomes is warranted., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: This study aimed to evaluate the contemporary surgical management of long-gap esophageal atresia, a rare and challenging problem managed by pediatric general surgeons., Methods: A retrospective review of the Pediatric Health Information System database for infants who underwent neonatal gastrostomy, followed by surgical reconstruction for long-gap esophageal atresia (2014-2021). Patients with birthweight less than 1.5 kg and those who received neonatal cardiac surgery were excluded. Outcomes were analyzed, including the need for further procedures, length of stay, and mortality., Results: Of 1,346 infants who underwent repair across 47 major children's hospitals, 100 (7%) met the inclusion criteria for long-gap esophageal atresia. Cardiac anomalies were identified in 43% of patients. The median age at repair was 87 days (interquartile range, 62-133). Ten percent of patients had a planned or unplanned reoperation ≤30 days after index surgery, and 4% underwent reoperation at >30 days. The median time to reoperation was 9 days (interquartile range, 7-60). Mortality during index admission was 5%, and the median hospital length of stay was 143 days (interquartile range, 101-192). Length of stay was significantly longer in patients with cardiac anomalies (cardiac: 179 days, non-cardiac: 125 days; P < .001), and 52% of patients required at least 1 postoperative dilation. The median time to the first dilation was 70 days (interquartile range, 42-173)., Conclusion: This large multicenter study highlights the challenges of infants with long-gap esophageal atresia but suggests a high rate of successful delayed primary reconstruction. Hospitalizations are prolonged, and anastomotic stricture rates remain high. These data are useful for pediatric surgeons in counseling families on surgical repair strategy, timing, and postoperative outcomes., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)