Search

Phospholipase A2 is the major allergen in honeybee venom. Recombinant phospholipase A2 was produced in prokaryotes and tested for its biologic activity by intracutaneous skin testing with serial 10-fold dilutions in comparison with native and deglycosylated phospholipase A2 in patients allergic to bee venom. Linear regressions of the log of the wheal area versus the log of the allergen concentration were calculated for all allergens in each patient. The relative allergenic potency of the various preparations was analyzed by comparing the linear regressions. Native phospholipase A2 was about 10 times more potent than whole bee venom. None of 58 patients allergic to bee venom was missed by testing with native phospholipase A2 alone. This allergen and deglycosylated native phospholipase A2 resulted in similar skin reactions, indicating that the sugar residues were of little relevance for IgE-binding in the patients tested. Native phospholipase A2 also had relative potency similar to that of recombinant refolded phospholipase A2, whereas recombinant nonrefolded phospholipase A2 had almost no biologic activity in skin testing. These results demonstrate in vivo activity of the recombinant bee venom allergen phospholipase A2. Although correct refolding is a prerequisite for type I skin reactivity, glycosylation seems to be less important.

Background: A complementary DNA encoding the major bee venom allergen phospholipase A2 (PLA) has been characterized recently. Recombinant PLA was produced in Escherichia coli and purified to apparent homogeneity. Natural PLA was compared with recombinant PLA in its ability to release histamine from blood basophils., Methods: A synthetic gene encoding the mature form of PLA was expressed in E. coli, and the polypeptide was purified to homogeneity by affinity chromatography and refolded, yielding fully enzymatically active PLA. In addition, we have produced a genetically engineered enzymatically inactive variant by substitution of a single amino acid residue in the catalytic center. A standard histamine release assay was used to compare the potency of natural PLA with correctly folded enzymatically active and inactive recombinant PLA to release histamine from blood basophils of nine patients with bee venom allergy., Results: Recombinant enzymatically active PLA and purified natural protein were equally effective in releasing histamine from sensitized basophils. By comparing the histamine-releasing capacity of enzymatically active and inactive recombinant allergen, we further demonstrate that catalytic activity is not a requirement for allergenicity in the effector phase. Denaturation of natural PLA or incorrect folding of recombinant protein resulted in a total loss of allergenic potency., Conclusion: We demonstrate the feasibility of producing native-like recombinant allergens with or without enzymatic activity. We also provide evidence for the requirement of correct three-dimensional structure of PLA to induce histamine release from basophils and thus evidence for its recognition by IgE.

Background: Two hybridomas, which secrete human monoclonal antibodies of IgG4 isotype specific for the main bee venom antigen/allergen phospholipase A2, were generated. The antigenic determinants recognized by these antibodies were mapped and compared with the binding sites of murine monoclonal and human polyclonal antibodies raised against the same antigen., Methods: Two hybridomas were developed by fusing heteromyelomas to Epstein-Barr virus immortalized B cells obtained from beekeepers. The cloned hybridomas were stable and secreted up to 40 mg/L of antibody into the culture supernatant. Phospholipase A2 specificity of the human monoclonal antibodies was confirmed by binding and inhibition ELISA and by Western blot analysis. Epitope mapping on phospholipase A2 was done with the PEPSCAN method and ELISA techniques., Results: The epitopes recognized by the human monoclonal antibodies were shown to be discontinuous and did not contain the sugar residue. Similar results were obtained with polyclonal antibodies of IgG4 isotype (from beekeepers) specific for phospholipase A2, which could also inhibit the binding of the human monoclonal antibodies to phospholipase A2. In contrast, antigen binding of the human monoclonal antibodies could not be inhibited by murine monoclonal antibodies against bee venom phospholipase A2., Conclusions: The data indicate that the human monoclonal antibodies obtained are representative of a part of the polyclonal immune response to phospholipase A2 from beekeepers and may allow a more precise analysis of the humoral immune response to phospholipase A2 that is associated with protection.