Search

Purpose: It is unclear whether the duct involvement subtypes of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN), ie, main (MD), mixed (MT), and branch (BD), confer any survival advantage when invasive IPMN occurs. We hypothesized that invasive MT-IPMN was associated with a better prognosis than invasive MD-IPMN., Methods: A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database was performed of patients who underwent resection for IPMN at a single academic institution from 1992 to 2014. Characterization of IPMN subtype was assessed on final operative pathology. Statistics included univariate analysis, Kaplan-Meier survival curves, and Cox regression for independent predictors of increased survival., Results: Of 390 patients eligible for study, 74 had invasive IPMN (IPMC). Of these, 71 patients had complete data and were included in the analysis (17 MD-IPMC, 39 MT-IPMC, and 15 BD-IPMC). Median follow-up was 20 months (range, 2-174). MT-IPMC was associated with significantly greater overall survival (OS) (47 months) compared with MD-IPMC (12 months) (P = .049), but not with BD-IPMC (44 months) (P = .67). Multivariate Cox regression yielded a family history of pancreatic cancer, absence of jaundice, N0 status, negative margins, absence of lymphovascular invasion, and MT subtype as independent predictors of greater OS (P = .035, .015, .013, .036, .045, .043, respectively). No characteristic of IPMN (including MD diameter, solid component/mural nodule) was predictive of OS., Conclusion: MT-IPMC appeared to be associated with a greater OS compared with pure MD-IPMC. This begs the question of a different underlying biology of MT-IPMN and argues against classification of all main duct involved IPMN into a single category., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Pancreatitis is associated with intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN). This association is in part due to inflammation from pancreatic ductal obstruction. Although the correlation between pancreatitis and the malignant potential of IPMN is unclear, the 2012 International Consensus Guidelines (ICG) consider pancreatitis a "worrisome feature." We hypothesized that serum pancreatic enzymes, markers of inflammation, are a better predictor of malignancy than pancreatitis in patients with IPMN., Methods: Between 1992 and 2012, 364 patients underwent resection for IPMN at a single university hospital. In the past decade, serum amylase and lipase were collected prospectively as an inflammatory marker in 203 patients with IPMN at initial surveillance and "cyst clinic" visits. The latest serum pancreatic enzyme values within 3 months preoperatively were studied. Pancreatitis was defined according to the 2012 revision of the Atlanta Consensus., Results: Of the 203 eligible patients, there were 76 with pancreatitis. Pancreatitis was not associated with an increased rate of malignancy (P = .51) or invasiveness (P = .08). Serum pancreatic enzymes categorically outside of normal range (high or low) were also not associated with malignancy or invasiveness. In contrast, as a continuous variable, the higher the serum pancreatic enzymes were, the greater the rate of invasive IPMN. Of the 127 remaining patients without pancreatitis, serum pancreatic enzymes outside of normal range (low and high) were each associated with a greater rate of malignancy (P < .0001 and P = .0009, respectively). Serum pancreatic enzyme levels above normal range (high) were associated with a greater rate of invasiveness (P = .02)., Conclusion: In patients with IPMN without a history of pancreatitis, serum pancreatic enzymes outside of the normal range are associated with a greater risk of malignancy. In patients with a history of pancreatitis, there is a positive correlation between the levels of serum pancreatic enzymes and the presence of invasive IPMN. These data suggest serum pancreatic enzymes may be useful markers in stratification of pancreatic cancer risk in patients with IPMN., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Obesity is an established risk factor for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. No study has examined specifically the influence of obesity on malignant risk in patients with intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN), a group at substantial risk of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. We hypothesize that obesity is associated with a greater frequency of malignancy in IPMN., Methods: Data on patients undergoing resection for IPMN between 1992 and 2012 at a high-volume university institution were collected prospectively. Clinicopathologic and demographic parameters were reviewed. Patients were classified according to World Health Organization categories of body mass index (BMI). Malignancy was defined as high-grade dysplastic or invasive IPMN., Results: We collected data on 357 patients who underwent resection for IPMN. Of these, 274 had complete data for calculation of preoperative BMI and 31% had malignant IPMN. Of 254 patients with a BMI of <35 kg/m(2), 30% had malignant IPMN versus 50% in patients with BMI of ≥35 (P = .08). In branch-duct IPMN, patients with a BMI of <35 had 12% of malignant IPMN compared with 46% in severely obese patients (P = .01). Alternatively, in main-duct IPMN, no difference was found in the malignancy rate (48% vs 56%; P = .74)., Conclusion: These findings suggest that obesity is associated with an increased frequency of malignancy in branch-duct IPMN. Obesity is a potentially modifiable risk factor that may influence oncologic risk stratification, patient counseling, and surveillance strategy., (Copyright © 2013 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: This retrospective cohort study analyzes the potential risks associated with preoperative fine needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy guided by endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) in patients undergoing distal pancreatectomy., Methods: Excluding 204 patients with acute or chronic pancreatitis and those with previous pancreatic resections, 230 consecutive patients with primary pancreatic neoplasms underwent elective distal pancreatectomy between 2002 and 2009. The most common indications were adenocarcinoma (28%), intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN; 20%), and endocrine neoplasms (17%). Two-way statistical comparisons were performed between patients who did (EUS(+)) or did not (EUS(-)) undergo preoperative EUS-FNA., Results: Distal pancreatectomy was performed open in 118 patients (56%) and laparoscopically in 102 patients (44%). No differences were observed in age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, operative time, or blood loss between the EUS(+) (n = 179) and EUS(-) (n = 51) groups. Splenectomy was performed in 162 patients (70%) and was more common in the EUS(+) group. With the exception of adenocarcinoma (n = 57 [32%] EUS(+) vs n = 6 [12%] EUS(-); P < .01), the final pathologic diagnosis did not differ significantly between the EUS groups. Postoperative complications were more common in the EUS(+) patients with cystic neoplasms (43% vs 16% EUS(-); P = .04). EUS-FNA caused pancreatitis in 2 patients preoperatively. No differences in overall or recurrence-free survival were noted between cancer patients in the EUS groups. Patterns of tumor recurrence were not associated with EUS-FNA., Conclusion: Preoperative EUS-FNA is not associated with adverse perioperative or long-term outcomes in patients undergoing distal pancreatectomy for solid neoplasms of the pancreas. The potentially detrimental long-term impact of preoperative EUS-FNA in patients with resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma was not observed, but will require additional study., (Copyright © 2011 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.)