Search

Introduction Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a serious health problem, and various screening programs to reduce CRC have been introduced worldwide. However, the cost‑effectiveness of a program based on once‑in‑a‑lifetime colonoscopy in Poland is unknown. Objectives The main aim of this study was to assess the cost‑effectiveness of Polish Colonoscopy Screening Platform (PCSP), the colonoscopy screening program in Poland. Patients and methods A Markov model was constructed to compare the strategy of colonoscopy screening as compared with no screening in 100 000 subjects. The model was based on data collected from the nationwide Polish CRC screening program whenever possible. The incremental cost‑effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated and compared with the willingness‑to‑pay thresholds. A sensitivity analysis was also performed using the Monte Carlo simulation. Results Colonoscopy screening within PCSP resulted in a 18.9% reduction in CRC incidence and 19.8% reduction in CRC mortality. The strategy allowed a gain of 2317 life‑years saved (1959 after discount‑ ing). The cost of colonoscopy screening per participant examined was estimated at 267.70 USD (95% CI, 263.08-272.32 USD). The ICER was less than 6500 USD, which was much lower than the accepted willingness‑to‑pay thresholds, indicating that the screening was cost‑effective. Conclusions Colonoscopy screening within the PCSP is cost‑effective and may have a substantial impact on the Polish society due to life‑years saved. The results have good informative value not only for health policy makers and medical practitioners, but also for health technology assessment.

INTRODUCTION Surgery is recommended following endoscopic polypectomy for malignant adenoma (MA) in the large bowel in patients with risk factors for tumor recurrence or distant metastasis are present. OBJECTIVES We present long‑term outcomes of a prospective study in patients with endoscopically removed MAs. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 128 patients who underwent endoscopic polypectomy were followed up for a median of 70.4 months. The criteria for adequate polypectomy included endoscopically and histologically (margin ≥2 mm) complete excision, lack of angioinvasion, and good tumor differentiation (G1 or G2). Sixty‑seven patients did not meet 1 or more of the criteria (high‑risk group) and 61 met all of the criteria (low‑risk group). Unfavorable outcomes were residual disease, lymph node metastasis, recurrent disease, distant metastasis, or death due to colorectal cancer. Histological samples from 85 patients were reassessed to determine the effect of a margin width of 1 mm or more and tumor budding on the outcomes. RESULTS Surgery was performed in 36 patients (28.1%), of whom 32 (47.7%) were high‑risk and 4 (6.5%) were low‑risk. Unfavorable outcome was observed in 10 patients (7.8%; all high‑risk; 10 of 67 patients, 14.9%). Favorable outcome was observed in 61 of 128 patients who had a 2‑mm free margin, and in 44 of 85 patients who fulfilled the modified criterion of 1‑mm free margin. Tumor budding was detected in 17 of 85 patients (20.9%). Unfavorable outcome was observed in 2 of these patients (11.7%) and in 5 patients (7.3%) without tumor budding (P >0.05). DISCUSSION Long‑term outcomes of an endoscopic resection of MAs are good. Bowel resection does not prevent unfavorable outcomes, while a reduction of the tumor‑free margin would not deteriorate the results (STROBE 1B).