1. Validity and feasibility of a temperature sensor for measuring use and non-use of orthopaedic footwear
- Author
-
Jaap J. van Netten, Juha M. Hijmans, Klaas Postema, Thijs Lutjeboer, Extremities Pain and Disability (EXPAND), SMART Movements (SMART), and Rehabilitation medicine
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,validity ,medicine.medical_specialty ,PRESCRIPTION ,orthopaedic footwear ,temperature sensor ,030209 endocrinology & metabolism ,Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation ,02 engineering and technology ,DIABETIC FOOTWEAR ,Standard deviation ,Objective assessment ,03 medical and health sciences ,ADHERENCE ,0302 clinical medicine ,PEOPLE ,medicine ,Humans ,TECHNOLOGY ,PRESCRIBED FOOTWEAR ,Reference standards ,business.industry ,Rehabilitation ,Temperature ,Outcome measures ,Reproducibility of Results ,Mean age ,General Medicine ,021001 nanoscience & nanotechnology ,RHEUMATOID-ARTHRITIS ,Orthopedics ,BIAS ,Physical therapy ,validity, feasibility ,Feasibility Studies ,Female ,use ,0210 nano-technology ,business ,SHOES ,feasibility - Abstract
Objective: Adherence is a prerequisite for the effectiveness of orthopaedic footwear. The aim of this study is to assess the validity of a new temperature sensor for objective assessment of footwear use and non-use.Design: Observational study.Methods: The validity of a temperature sensor (Orthotimer, Balingen, Germany) to discriminate between time periods of use and non-use of footwear over a period of 48 h was assessed using 3 algorithms, in 10 healthy participants (mean age 32.8 years (standard deviation (SD) 14.1 years)). Footwear use measured with the sensor was compared with a reference standard, footwear use measured with a time-lapse sports camera secured to the shoe. Main outcome measure: Hours of footwear use.Results: Mean footwear use measured with the camera was 8.10 (SD 2.46) h per day. Mean footwear uses measured with the sensor and calculated with the 3 algorithms were 8.16 (SD 2.37), 8.86 (SD 2.48) and 4.91 (SD 3.17) h per day for the Groningen algorithm, algorithm-25, and algorithm-29, respectively. The correlation between footwear use assessed with the camera and with the sensor was: r(Groningen) = 0.995, r(alg25) = 0.919 and r(alg29) = 0.680).Conclusion: The temperature sensor is a valid instrument to measure footwear use and non-use when using the Groningen algorithm.
- Published
- 2018