Search

The hit compound 1,2,4-triazolo[4’,3’:2,3]pyridazino[4,5-b]indole 3 was synthesized from the reflux of 4-amino-5-indolyl-1,2,4-triazole-3-thione 1 with 4′-bromoacetophenone 2 in methanol catalyzed by concentrated HCl and the desired final molecule was obtained by recrystallization from methanol. The suggested structures of compounds 1 and 3 based on the spectral characterizations were confirmed by X-ray single crystal diffraction analysis. Compound 3 crystallized in the triclinic crystal system and P-1 space group with a = 5.9308(2) Å, b = 10.9695(3) Å, c = 14.7966(4) Å, α = 100.5010(10)°, β = 98.6180(10)°, and γ = 103.8180(10)°. On the other hand, the crystal system of 1 is monoclinic, where a = 6.23510(10) Å, b = 26.0156(4) Å, c = 12.4864(2) Å, β = 93.243(2)° and the space group is P21. The triazole and indole rings are found twisted from each other in both compounds. The twist angle is higher in 3 (12.65°) than 1 (4.94–7.22°). In the case of the former, the H…H (39.6%), H…C (22.0%), N…H (12.8%) and Br…H (13.2%) contacts are the most dominant while the C…C, C…H, Br…H, N…H and S…S contacts have the characteristics of strong interactions. In the latter, the C…H, N…H, S…H, S…S, and C…C contacts are the most important. In this case, the percentages of the H…H, C…H, N…H and S…H contacts are in the range of 34.9–37.4, 20.5–24.0, 12.2–13.6, 14.0–15.8, respectively. In both systems, the shape index and curvedness of surfaces confirmed the presence of π–π stacking interactions. peerReviewed

A new compounds named 3-4′-bipyrazoles 2 and 3 were synthesized in high chemical yield from a reaction of pyran-2,4-diketone 1 with aryl hydrazines under thermal conditions in MeOH. Compound 2 was unambiguously confirmed by single-crystal X-ray analysis. It crystalizes in a triclinic crystal system and space group P-1. Its crystal structure was found to be in good agreement with the spectral characterizations. With the aid of Hirshfeld calculations, the H…H (54.8–55.3%) and H…C (28.3–29.2%) intermolecular contacts are the most dominant, while the O…H (5.8–6.5%), N…H (3.8–4.6%) and C…C (3.0–4.9%) are less dominant. The compound has a polar nature with a net dipole moment of 6.388 Debye. The BD(2)C31-C32→BD*(2)N4-C34 (27.10 kcal/mol), LP(1)N5→BD*(2)C31-C32 (36.90 kcal/mol), BD(1)C32-C34→BD*(1)C18-C31 (6.78 kcal/mol) and LP(1)N4→BD*(1)N5-C31 (7.25 kcal/mol) are the strongest π→π*, n→π*, σ-σ* and n→σ* intramolecular charge transfer processes, respectively.

Intra and intermolecular interactions found in the developed crystals of the synthesized py-ron-2,4-dione derivatives play crucial rules in the molecular conformations and crystal stabili-ties, respectively. In this regard, Hirshfeld calculations were used to quantitatively analyze the different intermolecular interactions in the crystal structures of some functionalized py-ran-2,4-dione derivatives. The X-ray structure of pyran-2,4-dione derivative namely (3E,3′E)-3,3′-((ethane-1,2-diylbis(azanediyl))bis(phenylmethanylylidene))bis(6-phenyl-2H-pyran-2,4(3H)-dione) was determined. It crystallized in the monoclinic crystal system and C2/c space group with unit cell parameters: a = 14.0869(4) Å, b = 20.9041(5) Å, c = 10.1444(2) Å and β = 99.687(2)°. Generally, the H…H, H…C, O…H and C…C contacts are the most important interactions in the molecular packing of the studied pyran-2,4-diones. The molecular structure of these compounds is stabilized by intramolecular O…H hydrogen bond. The nature and strength of the O…H hy-drogen bonds were analyzed using atoms in molecules calculations. In all compounds, the O…H hydrogen bond belongs to closed-shell interactions where the interaction energies are higher at the optimized geometry than the X-ray one due to the shortening in the A…H distance as a con-sequence of the geometry optimization. These compounds have polar characters with different charged regions which explored using molecular electrostatic potential map. Their natural charges, reactivity descriptors and NMR chemical shifts were computed, discussed and compared.

The ruthenium carbonyl compounds, Ru(bpy)(CO)2X2 (X = Cl, Br or I) act as neutral halogen bond (XB) acceptors when co-crystallized with 1,4-diiodotetrafluoro-benzene (DITFB). The halogen bonding strength of the Ru-X&sdot, &sdot, I halogen bonds follow the nucleophilic character of the halido ligand. The strongest halogen bond occurs between the chlorido ligand and the iodide atoms of the DITFB. All three halogen bonded complexes form polymeric assemblies in the solid state. In Ru(bpy)(CO)2Cl2&sdot, DITFB (1) and in Ru(bpy)(CO)2Br2&sdot, DITFB (2) both halido ligands are halogen bonded to only one DITFB donor. In Ru(bpy)(CO)2I2&sdot, DITFB (3) only one of the halido ligands is involved in halogen bonding acting as ditopic center for two DITFB donors. The polymeric structures of 1 and 2 are isomorphic wave-like single chain systems, while the iodine complexes form pairs of linear chains attached together with weak F&sdot, O&equiv, C interactions between the closest neighbors. The stronger polarization of the iodide ligand compared to the Cl or Br ligands favors nearly linear C-I&sdot, I angles between the XB donor and the metal complex supporting the linear arrangement of the halogen bonded chain.

[TiCp2S5] (phase A), [TiCp2Se5] (phase F), and five solid solutions of mixed titanocene selenide sulfides [TiCp2SexS5−x] (Cp = C5H5−) with the initial Se:S ranging from 1:4 to 4:1 (phases B–E) were prepared by reduction of elemental sulfur or selenium or their mixtures by lithium triethylhydridoborate in thf followed by the treatment with titanocene dichloride [TiCp2Cl2]. Their 77Se and 13C NMR spectra were recorded from the CS2 solution. The definite assignment of the 77Se NMR spectra was based on the PBE0/def2-TZVPP calculations of the 77Se chemical shifts and is supported by 13C NMR spectra of the samples. The following complexes in varying ratios were identified in the CS2 solutions of the phases B–E: [TiCp2Se5] (51), [TiCp2Se4S] (41), [TiCp2Se3S2] (31), [TiCp2SSe3S] (36), [TiCp2SSe2S2] (25), [TiCp2SSeS3] (12), and [TiCp2S5] (01). The disorder scheme in the chalcogen atom positions of the phases B–E observed upon crystal structure determinations is consistent with the spectral assignment. The enthalpies of formation calculated for all twenty [TiCp2SexS5−x] (x = 0–5) at DLPNO-CCSD(T)/CBS level including corrections for core-valence correlation and scalar relativistic, as well as spin-orbit coupling contributions indicated that within a given chemical composition, the isomers of most favourable enthalpy of formation were those, which were observed by 77Se and 13C NMR spectroscopy.