Search

To improve the forecast accuracy of heavy precipitation, re-forecasts are conducted for the Henan 21.7 rainstorm. The Intermediate Complexity Atmospheric Research Model (ICAR) and the Weather Research and Forecasting Model (WRF) with a 1 km horizontal grid spacing are used for the re-forecasts. The results indicate that heavy precipitation forecasted by ICAR primarily accumulates on the windward slopes of the mountains. In contrast, some severe precipitation forecasted by WRF is beyond the mountains. The main difference between ICAR and WRF is that ICAR excludes the “impacts of physical processes on winds and the nonlinear interactions between the small resolvable-scale disturbances” (briefed as the “physical–dynamical interactions”). Thus, heavy precipitation beyond the mountains is attributed to the “physical–dynamical interactions”. Furthermore, severe precipitation on the windward slopes of the mountains typically aligns with the observations, whereas heavy rainfall beyond the mountains seldom matches the observations. Therefore, severe precipitation on the windward slopes of (beyond) the mountains is more (less) predictable. Based on these findings and theoretical thinking about the predictability of severe precipitation, a scheme of using the ICAR’s prediction to adjust the WRF’s prediction is proposed, thereby improving the forecast accuracy of heavy rainfall.

Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) radio occultation (RO) technology has been widely used in Earth atmospheric detection and has a significant impact on numerical weather prediction (NWP), climate detection, and other fields. Cosmic-2 LEO-1 (C2E1) is a well-known RO data provider; however, its observations are confined to 45°S and 45°N. Recently, the Binhu meteorological observation test satellite (BH) has provided global coverage of RO data, including refractivity, specific humidity, and temperature data. In this study, RO data from BH and C2E1 are analyzed and compared from 8 February 2022 to 17 February 2022. Employing the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) reanalysis (ERA-5) data as a reference, both BH and C2E1 RO data agree with the ERA data, with the refractivity, temperature, and specific humidity profiles reflecting the real conditions of the natural atmosphere. In addition, BH data are comparable to C2E1 data at low and middle latitudes (0–45°), and BH data at middle and high latitudes (45–90°) are of better quality than those at low and middle latitudes (0–45°). For example, without considering the errors introduced by the interpolation of the ERA-5 data for comparative analysis, the BH refractivity profiles show a mean absolute bias of 0.73 N at low and middle latitudes and only 0.23 N at middle and high latitudes, and that for BH specific humidity profiles at middle and high latitudes is 0.015 g/kg, which is only half of that at low and middle latitudes. The BH temperature and specific humidity data show promising data accuracy. Therefore, BH RO data may provide important supplementary data at higher latitudes and may improve future NWPs through assimilation.