Search

Background/Objectives : To compare the clinical outcome of suture and sutureless iris fixation techniques for dislocated intraocular lenses (IOLs). Methods : Retrospective cohort study including patients who underwent surgery for late IOL dislocation over a 10-year period. IOL repositioning was achieved either by suturing the original IOL to the iris using the Siepser slipknot technique or by replacing it with a retropupillary sutureless iris claw IOL. Data collected during surgery included the type of dislocation, the need for anterior or posterior vitrectomy, duration of surgery, and intraoperative complications. Six months after surgery we assessed the eye and iris anatomy; refraction, astigmatism, and visual acuity; endothelial cell damage; and rate of postoperative complications. Results : Included in the study were 60 patients: 32 underwent IOL relocation and 28 underwent IOL exchange. Pseudoexfoliation (43.7% and 39.3%) and retinal surgery (34.4% and 28.6%) were identified as the main possible causes for IOL dislocation. The mean duration of the surgery was 62.9 ± 14.9 min for the Relocation group, and was 42.7 ± 11.4 min for the Exchange group ( p < 0.001), with similar low intraoperative complication rates (6.25% and 7.14%, respectively). The studied parameters showed no differences between the two groups postoperatively, except for corneal astigmatism which was 1.31 ± 0.45 D in the Relocation group and was 1.89 ± 0.86 D in the Exchange group ( p < 0.001). Conclusions : Both suture and sutureless iris fixation techniques for dislocated IOLs yielded similarly favorable outcomes in this study. IOL relocation resulted in less postoperative astigmatism, while IOL exchange offered the advantage of shorter surgical time.

Pars plana vitrectomy is today a common first-line procedure for treatment of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD). Removal or preservation of the natural lens at the time of vitrectomy is associated with both advantages and disadvantages. The combination of cataract extraction (i.e., phacoemulsification) with pars plana vitrectomy (PPVc) enhances visualization of the peripheral retina and the surgical management of the vitreous base. However, PPVc prolongs the surgical time and is associated with iatrogenic loss of the accommodation function in younger patients, possible postoperative anisometropia, and unexpected refractive results. Performance of pars plana vitrectomy alone (PPVa) requires good technical skills to minimize the risk of lens damage, and quickens cataract development. We retrieved all recent papers that directly compared PPVc and PPVa using parameters that we consider essential when choosing between the two procedures (the success rate of anatomical RRD repair, postoperative refractive error, intra- and postoperative complications, and costs). PPVa and PPVc were generally comparable in terms of RRD anatomical repair. PPVc was associated with fewer intraoperative, but more postoperative, complications. Macula-off RRD PPVc treatment was often associated with undesirable myopic refractive error. PPVa followed by phacoemulsification was the most expensive procedure., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Purpose: This retrospective case-control study was conducted to quantitatively and qualitatively assess the visual impairment in eyes with Epithelial Basement Membrane Dystrophy (EBMD) after regular cataract surgery., Methods: EBMD pseudophakic eyes were compared with matched pseudophakic eyes free from surface disorders. At least 3 weeks after surgery we evaluated uncorrected and best-corrected distance visual acuity (UDVA and CDVA), objective aberrometry, Point Spread Function (PSF), Modulation Transfer Function (MTF), and patient complaints., Results: Twenty-five EBMD eyes and 25 control eyes (13 patients per group) were included. Nine patients per group had a monofocal IOL, and four patients had a trifocal IOL. All the EBMD patients complained of postoperative blurred vision with ocular discomfort; intensive use of lubricants induced subjective improvement only in eyes with monofocal IOLs. Postoperative mean UDVA was 0.19 ± 0.16 LogMAR in the EBMD eyes and 0.11 ± 0.04 LogMAR in the control group ( p = 0.016). Mean CDVA was 0.18 ± 0.15 LogMAR in the EBMD eyes and 0.06 ± 0.04 LogMAR in the control eyes ( p = 0.001). The PSF curve width was significantly worse in the EBMD group ( p < 0.001). The MTF cut-off value was lower in the EBMD group than in the control group ( p < 0.001)., Conclusion: After cataract removal, eyes with EBMD had significantly lower UDVA and CDVA than controls. All the aberrometric parameters were significantly worse in EBMD cases. EBMD patients complained about their postoperative visual outcome, while control patients did not.