Search

Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are one of the most common human infections and are most often caused by Gram-negative bacteria such as Escherichia coli. In view of the increasing number of antibiotic-resistant isolates, rapidly initiating effective antibiotic therapy is essential. Therefore, a faster antibiotic susceptibility test (AST) is desirable. The MALDI-TOF MS-based phenotypic antibiotic susceptibility test (MALDI AST) has been used in blood culture diagnostics to rapidly detect antibiotic susceptibility. This study demonstrates for the first time that MALDI AST can be used to rapidly determine antibiotic susceptibility in UTIs directly from patients’ urine samples. MALDI-TOF MS enables the rapid identification and AST of Gram-negative UTIs within 4.5 h of receiving urine samples. Six urinary tract infection antibiotics, including ciprofloxacin, cotrimoxazole, fosfomycin, meropenem, cefuroxime, and nitrofurantoin, were analyzed and compared with conventional culture-based AST methods. A total of 105 urine samples from UTI patients contained bacterial isolates for MALDI AST. The combination of ID and AST by MALDI-TOF allowed us to interpret the result according to EUCAST guidelines. An overall agreement of 94.7% was found between MALDI AST and conventional AST for the urinary tract pathogens tested.

Bloodstream infections caused by Candida yeasts (candidemia) are associated with high morbidity and mortality. Diagnosis remains challenging, with the current gold standard—isolation from blood culture (BC)—being limited by low sensitivity and long turnaround time. This study evaluated the performance of two nonculture methods: PCR and β-1,3-D-glucan (BDG) testing. The sera of 103 patients with BC-proven candidemia and of 46 controls were analyzed with the Fungiplex Candida Real-Time PCR and the Wako β-Glucan Test. The BDG assay demonstrated higher sensitivity than the multiplex PCR (58% vs. 33%). This was particularly evident in ICU patients (60% vs. 28%) and in C. albicans candidemia (57% vs. 37%). The earlier prior to BC sampling the sera were obtained, the more the PCR sensitivity decreased (46% to 18% in the periods of 0–2 and 3–5 days before BC, respectively), while BDG testing was independent of the sampling date. No positive PCR results were obtained in sera sampled more than five days before BC. Specificities were 89% for BDG and 93% for PCR testing. In conclusion, BDG testing demonstrated several advantages over PCR testing for the diagnosis of candidemia, including higher sensitivity and earlier diagnosis. However, BC remains essential, as BDG does not allow for species differentiation.