Search

Background/Objectives : To evaluate the advanced lens measurement approach (ALMA) formula accuracy using different lens constants available on the user group for laser interference biometry (ULIB) and IOL Con platforms. Methods: In this retrospective, comparative, case-series study, 150 eyes of 160 patients with previous myopic Photorefractive Keratectomy (PRK) or laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK), who underwent uneventful cataract surgery and IOL implantation, were examined. The ALMA formula was evaluated to calculate the refractive prediction error (PE), analysing four different categories of lens constants: both nominal and optimized A-Constant for SRKT, which are available on the ULIB and IOL Con platforms. An additional analysis was carried out in this study, evaluating if a decreased ULIB optimized constant (DUOC) with different fixed factors (-1.2 -1.3 -1.4 -1.5) could improve refractive outcomes. Median absolute error (MedAE) and percentage of eyes within ±0.50 and ±1.00 diopters (D) of prediction error were measured as the main outcomes. Results: Comparing the lens factors available on ULIB and IOL Con platforms, the ALMA formula reported a lower MedAE and higher percentages of eyes with a refractive PE within 1.0 D using ULIB nominal constants (all p < 0.05). Using DUOC (-1.3), and there was a statistically significant improvement of both MedAE and of the percentages of eyes with PE within ±0.50 D with the ALMA method compared to nominal ULIB constants (all p < 0.05). Conclusions: The impact of different lens factors in the IOL power calculation after myopic LRS should be carefully evaluated. The ALMA formula, in the absence of optimized constants by zeroing the mean error, should be used by subtracting 1.3 from the optimized ULIB constants available on the IOL Con website. This finding suggests further studies to test which of these constants could work better with the other post-refractive surgery formulas.

In this study, intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured in sitting, supine, prone, and standing (ST) positions and again five minutes after standing (ST-5) utilizing a Tono-Pen AVIA in 124 eyes of 62 healthy subjects with ages ranging from 21 to 59 years (mean 30 ± 10 years). In each subject, the average IOP of both eyes was used for the statistical evaluation. The mean IOP difference between the ST and sitting positions was -0.13 ± 1.63 mmHg ( p = 0.548); between ST-5 and sitting, it was 0.53 ± 1.24 mmHg ( p = 0.001); between supine and sitting, it was 1.30 ± 1.48 mmHg ( p < 0.001); between ST and supine, it was -1.43 ± 1.74 mmHg ( p < 0.001); between ST-5 and supine, it was -0.77 ± 1.59 mmHg ( p < 0.001); between prone and supine, it was 2.24 ± 1.92 mmHg ( p < 0.001); between ST and ST-5, it was -0.67 ± 1.84 mmHg (range: -7.5 to 5 mmHg) ( p = 0.007); between prone and ST, it was 3.46 ± 2.01 mmHg ( p < 0.001); between ST-5 and prone, it was -2.46 ± 1.67 mmHg ( p < 0.001); and between sitting and prone, it was -3.22 ± 1.56 mmHg ( p < 0.001). The results show a significant IOP increase in the ST-5 position, suggesting that such measurements need to be performed in an attempt to explain the progression of glaucoma in apparently normal-tension patients.

The use of choroidal vascularization to diagnose and follow-up ocular and systemic pathologies has been consolidated in recent research. Unfortunately, the choroidal parameters can be different depending on the lighting settings of optical coherence tomography (OCT) images. The purpose of this study was to examine whether the brightness of OCT images could influence the measurements of choroidal parameters obtained by processing and analyzing scientific images with the ImageJ program. In this observational, prospective, non-randomized study, 148 eyes of 74 patients with a mean age of 30.7 ± 8.5 years (ranging from 23 to 61 years) were assessed. All patients underwent a complete ophthalmological examination including slit lamp, fundus oculi, ocular biometry, corneal tomography and spectral domain (SD) OCT evaluations of the foveal region in the enhanced depth imaging (EDI) mode. OCT images at two different brightness levels were obtained. The total choroidal area (TCA), choroidal vascularity index (CVI), stromal choroidal area (SCA) and luminal choroidal area (LCA) at both lower and higher brightness levels were measured. To avoid the bias of operator-dependent error, the lower and higher brightness TCAs were obtained using two methods: the manual tracking mode and fixed area. At the two different brightness levels, LCA, SCA and CVI measurements showed statistically significant changes ( p < 0.05), whereas the TCA differences were not statistically significant ( p > 0.05). According to the results of this study, highlighting that brightness could affect LCA, SCA and CVI parameters, care should be taken during OCT image acquisition.

Due to the wide etiology of conjunctivitis, the expensive and time-consuming diagnosis requires new therapeutic strategies with broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity and nonselective mechanisms of action. In this context, eye drops could provide an alternative to conventional antimicrobial therapies. Here, we compare the antibacterial and antiviral activity of Oftasecur and Visuprime, commercially available ophthalmic solutions. Cytotoxicity assay was performed on Vero CCL-81 cells by 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl-tetrazolium bromide (MTT) test. Antibacterial efficacy was evaluated on Staphylococcus aureus , Staphylococcus epidermidis , Pseudomonas aeruginosa , Escherichia coli, and Klebsiella pneumoniae by disk diffusion, broth microdilution methods, and time-killing tests. Furthermore, the antiviral activity against HSV-1 was estimated by co-treatment, cell and viral pretreatment and post-treatment, via plaque reduction assay, fluorescence assessment (GFP-engineered HSV-1), and real-time PCR. After 24 h of exposure, Oftasecur and Visuprime showed a volume-inducing 50% of cytotoxicity of 125 and 15.8 μL, respectively Oftasecur and Visuprime induced 90% antibacterial activity in response to mean volume of 10.0 and 4.4 µL for Gram-positive and Gram-negative strains, respectively. Oftasecur exerted bactericidal action on both bacterial populations, while Visuprime was bacteriostatic on Gram-negative strains and slightly bactericidal on Gram-positive bacteria. A major impact on infectivity occurred by exposure of viral particles to the ophthalmic solutions. In detail, 50% of inhibition was verified by exposing the viral particles to 3.12 and 0.84 μL of Oftasecur and Visuprime, respectively, for 1 h. The reduction of the fluorescence and the expression of the viral genes confirmed the recorded antiviral activity. Due to their high antimicrobial efficiency, Oftasecur and Visuprime could represent a valid empirical strategy for the treatment of conjunctivitis.